{"id":189627,"date":"2017-04-27T01:43:45","date_gmt":"2017-04-27T05:43:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/united-states-earns-c-in-first-amendment-report-card-georgetown-university-the-hoya\/"},"modified":"2017-04-27T01:43:45","modified_gmt":"2017-04-27T05:43:45","slug":"united-states-earns-c-in-first-amendment-report-card-georgetown-university-the-hoya","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/first-amendment-2\/united-states-earns-c-in-first-amendment-report-card-georgetown-university-the-hoya\/","title":{"rendered":"United States Earns C+ in First Amendment Report Card &#8211; Georgetown University The Hoya"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      NEWSEUM FACEBOOK      The U.S. received a barely passing grade for its treatment of      First Amendment protections.    <\/p>\n<p>    The United States earned a C+ overall grade in the Newseum    Institutes inaugural First Amendment Report Card, which    analyzed the state of the freedoms of religion, speech, press,    assembly and petition.  <\/p>\n<p>    The freedoms of assembly and petition received the highest    grades, each earning a B-, while the freedoms of religion and    speech each obtained a mark of C+. The panelists gave the    freedom of the press the lowest grade: a C-.  <\/p>\n<p>    Newseum Institute Chief Operating Officer Gene Policinski said    these grades may be the results of a citizenry that has taken    its First Amendment freedoms for granted, or that has defined    these freedoms in narrow ways, according to a piece published    on the Newseums News and Commentary section.  <\/p>\n<p>    With respect to the freedom of the press, Policinski    specifically cites surveys dating back to the 1990s that show    growing public apprehension about whether the media continues    to play a watchdog role.  <\/p>\n<p>    Policinski also cites the resource dearth that many journalists    and media employees now face.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ken Paulson, the president of the Newseum Institutes First    Amendment Center, said the grades given in the First Amendment    Report Card are likely related to the current administrations    expressed views on the media and press.  <\/p>\n<p>    President Donald Trump recently announced he will not attend    the White House Correspondents Dinner, making him the first    sitting president in 36 years to miss the dinner. He has    repeatedly attacked news organizations that report unfavorably    about his administration, including CNN and The New York Times.  <\/p>\n<p>    Most notably, Trump called the press the enemy of the American    people in a Feb. 17 tweet, while Press Secretary Sean Spicer    prevented journalists from The Times and other news    organizations from attending an informal briefing on Feb. 24.    White House Chief Strategist Stephen Bannon labelled the news    media as the opposition party in a Jan. 25 interview with The    New York Times.  <\/p>\n<p>    There are issues involving the presidents stance toward the    news media that are of concern. When you single out a    free press as being the enemy of the people, thats going to    have an unfortunate effect on both the news media and the    public perception of the news media, Paulson said in an    interview with The Hoya.  <\/p>\n<p>    Adjudicated by a panel of 15 First Amendment scholars, lawyers,    journalists and activists, the rating, released April 20,    reported a 2.39 average out of 5 after individually scoring the    state of freedom of religion, speech, the press, assembly and    petition based on legislation, executive orders, judicial    decisions and public opinion during the past year.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    The Newseum Institute serves as a branch of Washington, D.C.s    Newseum, a museum dedicated to documenting the history of the    First Amendment in the United States, and works to promote,    explain and defend individual liberties.  <\/p>\n<p>    Georgetown School of Continuing Studies journalism professor    Alan Bjerga said it is difficult to judge these ratings, due to    the fact that this is the inaugural First Amendment Report    Card.  <\/p>\n<p>    Its tough to tell because its a first-time rating. You dont    know what its relative to, Bjerga said in an interview with    The Hoya. C, B, thats very subjective. I would say that being    a journalist is not getting any easier.  <\/p>\n<p>    Bjerga said reporters face unique challenges today, especially    as so-called fake news and misinformation spread on the    internet and on radio.  <\/p>\n<p>    Journalists face the challenge of an environment where    inaccurate information can be propagated very widely, while    accurate, at times less sensational information may struggle to    be heard or distributed as widely. At the same time, I think    there is a rising appreciation of the necessity and the value    of quality journalism, Bjerga said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Bjerga said he was optimistic about the future for press    freedoms, saying journalists are rising to the challenge and    determined to thrive in response to the current political    climate.  <\/p>\n<p>    Lata Nott, the executive director of the Newseum Institutes    First Amendment Center, reviewed the results, pointing out that    while few As were awarded, no failing grades were given.  <\/p>\n<p>    Nott said Americans need to be more conscious and watchful of    problems related to the First Amendment.  <\/p>\n<p>    Theres a sense that our freedoms need to be watched    carefully, that theyre threatened. Theres concerns about what    might happen in the future. But at the same time, there was    also a sense that these freedoms are resilient. As Americans,    we do think that theyre important, Nott said in an interview    with The Hoya.  <\/p>\n<p>    Nott said some problems, like the continuing lack of laws for    protecting journalists and privacy, will persist during Trumps    administration.  <\/p>\n<p>    People are probably more worried about the First Amendment    than they were before because the Trump administration has    taken some action that have been contrary to the First    Amendment, Nott said. Theres no federal shield law for    reporters. They can be compelled to give up their sources or be    jailed, when it comes to federal matters. The thing is,    thats always been the case.  <\/p>\n<p>    Nott emphasized the importance of tracking the quality of the    First Amendment freedoms and the importance of dialogue    regarding these freedoms.    Paulson said he continues to hope the United States moves    toward being a more free state.  <\/p>\n<p>    As a nation, we really need to remember that our strength    comes not just from the freedom to speak. Its also about the    willingness to listen. Were not making the most of our core    freedoms when we are so polarized that we cant benefit from    each others ideas, Paulson said. That has to change, and    that more than anything else would improve the report card for    the First Amendment.  <\/p>\n<p>    Have a reaction to this article? Write a    letter to the editor.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the original post here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.thehoya.com\/united-states-earns-c-in-first-amendment-report-card\/\" title=\"United States Earns C+ in First Amendment Report Card - Georgetown University The Hoya\">United States Earns C+ in First Amendment Report Card - Georgetown University The Hoya<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> NEWSEUM FACEBOOK The U.S.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/first-amendment-2\/united-states-earns-c-in-first-amendment-report-card-georgetown-university-the-hoya\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94877],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-first-amendment-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189627"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189627"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189627\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}