{"id":189338,"date":"2017-04-25T04:48:37","date_gmt":"2017-04-25T08:48:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/dear-berkeley-even-ann-coulter-deserves-free-speech-cnn\/"},"modified":"2017-04-25T04:48:37","modified_gmt":"2017-04-25T08:48:37","slug":"dear-berkeley-even-ann-coulter-deserves-free-speech-cnn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom-of-speech\/dear-berkeley-even-ann-coulter-deserves-free-speech-cnn\/","title":{"rendered":"Dear Berkeley: Even Ann Coulter deserves free speech &#8211; CNN"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>What could have caused this rip in the space-time continuum? The  so-called birthplace of the free speech movement, the  University of California at Berkeley, has once again engaged in  liberal censorship, this time of Ann Coulter, using the fear of  violence as cover to suppress a voice it did not like.<\/p>\n<p>  Conservative columnist Ann Coulter was invited to speak at UC  Berkeley by the Berkeley College Republicans. Given recent  violence against conservative speakers in Berkeley, the college  cancelled the speech. Coulter, to her credit, offered suggestions  as to how to better deal with any problems -- to expel any  students engaging in violence or trying to stop the speech from  happening. That solution apparently was not good enough for UC  Berkeley, which instead decided to reschedule the talk, but on a  date when there would be no students on campus.<\/p>\n<p>    While all this was going on, where was the    traditionally-free-speech-friendly moderate Left? The    prevailing view was, \"If you didn't say offensive things, you    wouldn't be attacked.\" Shame on the Left for tacitly condoning    this culture of violent suppression of views it disagrees with.  <\/p>\n<p>    And praise to Maher and Sanders for standing up against it. I    question whether Coulter would do the same for them, but that    is not the yardstick by which we measure our commitment to    freedom of speech. Standing up for the rights of those who    would not do it for us demonstrates your commitment to liberty.    We don't need a First Amendment for speech that neither    challenges, nor offends. We need it as a good in itself. And,    sometimes that very challenging and offensive speech fosters    growth.  <\/p>\n<p>    I am grateful that nobody tried to shut him down. Had they done    so, I would like to believe that I would have done whatever I    could to let the man speak. The kind of people who supported    him that day would not likely do the same for Charles Murray or    Milo Yiannopolous or Ann Coulter. I am certain that anyone    cheering Jeffries that day would have joined in the violence in    Berkeley -- smug in the belief that their ideas were \"right\"    and their opponents were \"wrong,\" thus justifying the violence.  <\/p>\n<p>    When anyone tries to shut down speech with violence, all decent    Americans should band together against the violence, regardless    of their political \"tribe.\" Does Berkeley stand for freedom of    expression, or is it so captivated by its infectious one-party    rule that it cannot possibly stand up for expression that    challenges its liberal sensibilities?  <\/p>\n<p>    Coulter has a right to her views. Just as important, we all    have a right to hear her speak.  <\/p>\n<p>    Those who disagree have a right to oppose her, but to use    violence cuts against the principles that our entire    Constitution rests upon. The First Amendment stands for    principles like those articulated in the case, New York Times    v. Sullivan: \"Debate on public issues ... [should be] ...    uninhibited, robust, and wide open.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    You may think Coulter's speech is offensive. I certainly do. I    think she is a mental midget and an intellectual snake oil    salesman. I do wish she would shut up, dry up, and blow away.    But even so, I am outraged that her political discussion must    go through an on-again, off-again process because either    violent thugs control the streets or effete and weak university    presidents and the City of Berkeley lack the spine to defend    the First Amendment.  <\/p>\n<p>    Violent trash should never stop Ann Coulter (or anyone else)    from speaking. Let her ideas flow forth into the stalls in the    marketplace and let the market reject (or embrace) her. My    ideas can stand in opposition to hers. And a bunch of cowardly    children playing revolutionary dress-up with bandanas over    their faces should not be permitted to destroy freedom of    expression. Despite my politics somewhat aligning with them, I    consider them to be my enemy -- not Ann Coulter.  <\/p>\n<p>    In these times, when political violence is becoming the norm,    it is your responsibility to stand up for freedom of    expression, even expression you dislike. Stand against the    violence, even when your tribe does it. Stand for freedom of    expression, even when you abhor the words and ideas.  <\/p>\n<p>    If you don't stand up for Coulter's liberty today, someone will    come for yours tomorrow. And, more importantly, the    Enlightenment will die a violent and pathetic death.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2017\/04\/24\/opinions\/ann-coulter-berkeley-free-speech-randazza-opinion\/\" title=\"Dear Berkeley: Even Ann Coulter deserves free speech - CNN\">Dear Berkeley: Even Ann Coulter deserves free speech - CNN<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> What could have caused this rip in the space-time continuum? The so-called birthplace of the free speech movement, the University of California at Berkeley, has once again engaged in liberal censorship, this time of Ann Coulter, using the fear of violence as cover to suppress a voice it did not like.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom-of-speech\/dear-berkeley-even-ann-coulter-deserves-free-speech-cnn\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162383],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-freedom-of-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189338"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189338"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189338\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}