{"id":189252,"date":"2017-04-25T04:31:50","date_gmt":"2017-04-25T08:31:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/the-right-engle-how-to-talk-to-non-libertarians-being-libertarian\/"},"modified":"2017-04-25T04:31:50","modified_gmt":"2017-04-25T08:31:50","slug":"the-right-engle-how-to-talk-to-non-libertarians-being-libertarian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/libertarianism\/the-right-engle-how-to-talk-to-non-libertarians-being-libertarian\/","title":{"rendered":"The Right Engle: How to Talk to Non-Libertarians &#8211; Being Libertarian"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The United States Libertarian Party is a strange beast. It has    a wide following within the movement and is comfortably the    countrys third largest party. Yet, its had little meaningful    electoral success in the decades of its existence. Smaller    parties in other countries, with far less widespread support    have managed to convert their core base into electoral    breakthrough; so, what is causing this failure in the    Libertarian Party?  <\/p>\n<p>    Part of the problem is the dual mandate the party has given    itself  to both compete in elections and be an educator on    libertarian principles and policy.  <\/p>\n<p>    A political party, by its nature, is distinct from any think    tank, club, or foundation, because it is designed to engage    directly in the political process and fight real campaigns. An    additional mandate to educate the public is fine to have, but    that mandate should not alter the unique position and role the    party has, as a political agent.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Libertarian Party must take up its unique position in the    libertarian movement and do all that is necessary to    professionalize its messaging and organizational strategies to    be competitive in the political sphere.  <\/p>\n<p>    If the party truly believes that its platform, if enacted,    would make the country and the world better, then it has an    obligation to fight for this enactment; If its going to    happen, we need to rethink how we approach both the electoral    and educational mandates.  <\/p>\n<p>    We need to focus less on making statements or proving points,    and more on convincing people in their hearts. This will    require a fundamental reevaluation of the way libertarians (in    the party or otherwise) spread the message to those not yet    convinced.  <\/p>\n<p>    Perhaps even more importantly, the Libertarian Party, and the    libertarian movement more broadly, must think in terms of how    to convince people.  <\/p>\n<p>    Too often we get caught up in internal factionalism and    disagreements on philosophy. Worse still, libertarians often    become dogmatically attached to notions they determine to be    axiomatically true; such as the claim that taxation is theft,    or that the non-aggression principle is an a priori    moral absolute. While libertarians may be convinced of these    principles  and may even consider them intuitively    self-evident  that is not the case for society at large. They    need to be convinced of these principles.  <\/p>\n<p>    The problem is that libertarians usually fail to engage    skeptics in a way that could potentially convert them to our    way of thinking.  <\/p>\n<p>    Because we are convinced of the axiomatic truth of our beliefs,    we treat opponents like they are wrong, ignorant, or even    morally perverse. This attitude throws up a barrier between the    libertarian and the skeptic, that, once raised, is very hard to    break down.  <\/p>\n<p>    We are a long way from a libertarian world because not enough    people have adopted the libertarian mindset. We need to change    those minds before we can meaningfully change society.    Libertarianism can only succeed if it reconciles all its sides    and factions  purist, radical, pragmatic, or whatever other    sub-label a group chooses. This squaring of the circle can only    begin when we start to think about messaging as a unifying,    rather than a divisive, exercise. The Libertarian Party and    other libertarian organizations should look toward exploring    the effects of their messaging strategies, and to refashion    them to engage outsiders.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is not a matter of abandoning our principles or beliefs.    It is a matter of understanding how people think and how they    respond emotionally and psychologically to new, and often    radical, ideas. We need to understand how people think and    feel, and talk to them like human beings. Maybe then well at    last begin to see the world we want to live in take shape.  <\/p>\n<p>      This post was written by John Engle.    <\/p>\n<p>      The views expressed here belong to the author and do not      necessarily reflect our views and opinions.    <\/p>\n<p>            John Engle is a merchant banker and author living in            the Chicago area. His company, Almington Capital,            invests in both early-stage venture capital and in            public equities. His writing has been featured in a            number of academic journals, as well as the blogs of            the Heartland Institute, Grassroot Institute, and Tenth            Amendment Center. A graduate of Trinity College Dublin,            Ireland and the University of Oxford, Johns first            book, Trinity Student Pranks: A History of Mischief and            Mayhem, was published in September 2013.          <\/p>\n<p>      Like Loading...    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/beinglibertarian.com\/right-engle-talk-non-libertarians\/\" title=\"The Right Engle: How to Talk to Non-Libertarians - Being Libertarian\">The Right Engle: How to Talk to Non-Libertarians - Being Libertarian<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The United States Libertarian Party is a strange beast. It has a wide following within the movement and is comfortably the countrys third largest party.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/libertarianism\/the-right-engle-how-to-talk-to-non-libertarians-being-libertarian\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189252","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-libertarianism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189252"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189252"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189252\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189252"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189252"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189252"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}