{"id":189229,"date":"2017-04-23T01:28:54","date_gmt":"2017-04-23T05:28:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ufc-fight-night-108-odds-gambling-guide-mma-fighting\/"},"modified":"2017-04-23T01:28:54","modified_gmt":"2017-04-23T05:28:54","slug":"ufc-fight-night-108-odds-gambling-guide-mma-fighting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/gambling\/ufc-fight-night-108-odds-gambling-guide-mma-fighting\/","title":{"rendered":"UFC Fight Night 108 odds, gambling guide &#8211; MMA Fighting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Welcome MMA bettors, speculators, and gambling lurkers! Were    back at it again for another week of comprehensive gambling    analysis from your friends at MMA Fighting.  <\/p>\n<p>    For those of you who are new, this aims to be an exhaustive    preview of the fights in context with the odds, and doubles as    a breakdown of where you can find betting value. The number    after the odds on each fighter is the probability of victory    that those odds imply (so Cub Swanson at -650 means he should    win 87 percent of the time). If you think he wins more often    than the odds say, you should bet it because there's value in    the line.  <\/p>\n<p>    All stats come from FightMetric and all the odds    are from Best Fight    Odds. Net Value means how much money you would have made if    you bet $100 on that fighter in every one of his\/her fights    that odds could be found for. Doubly as always, I'm trying to    provide the most thorough guide I can for those who want to    legally bet or who just enjoy following along. If you are a    person who chooses to gamble, only do so legally, responsibly,    and at your own risk.  <\/p>\n<p>    Now with all that out of the way, lets go.  <\/p>\n<p>    Breakdown  <\/p>\n<p>    The main event this weekend is the strangest one yet in the    WME-IMG era of UFC ownership. Featherweight    title hopeful Cub    Swanson takes on the man best known for being Conor    McGregors training partner, Artem    Lobov. Swanson is on an impressive three-fight win streak,    and his situation is a paradox...as in, a win does almost    nothing for him while it could also earn him the next    featherweight title shot. A win for Lobov would be by far the    biggest of his career and get him his first UFC ranking.  <\/p>\n<p>    Swanson is primarily a striker who relies on good footwork and    angles to set up stinging punching combinations. Hes one of    the better athletes in the division and you can see that in the    way he explodes into punches. Hes also is a thudding kicker    and a dangerous counter-puncher when hes in the pocket. Though    sometimes he can be drawn into ill-advised brawls, hes fast    enough and powerful enough to come out ahead in those too.  <\/p>\n<p>    Aside from striking, Swanson is a well-established veteran who    can compete in all phases. Hes an underrated offensive    wrestler with a variety of finishes and on top hes a pretty    solid control player. If Swanson has a semi-glaring weakness,    it has been his defensive wrestling, but that doesnt figure to    come into play much here.  <\/p>\n<p>    Lobov gets a fair amount of criticism for his uninspiring    record (13-12-1,) but hes actually a pretty solid fighter    whose record is more reflective of the tough competition hes    faced than anything else. Lobovs a striker by trade, and his    style looks more and more like McGregors each time out,    featuring non-standard movement and rhythm. Hes marketed as a    power puncher, but thats not entirely his game nor is he    what you might consider a volume striker. Rather, hes a    combination boxer with some pop in his hands and an aggressive,    countering style. While he has found a way to make this work    for him, it also puts him in range to be hit and his defense    isnt very good, as he tends to be overly reliant on his chin.  <\/p>\n<p>    Beyond striking, there isnt much to Lobovs game. Hes an    above average defender of takedowns and a competent offensive    wrestler on occasion but that is about the extent of it.  <\/p>\n<p>    Cub Swanson is just a much better fighter than Artem Lobov in    every area of the game. Even if Swanson brawls with Lobov (the    best chance Lobov has to emerge victorious), Swanson is still    likely to win and if he fights a precise, technical fight. If    Cub does that, this is all one-way traffic from the jump. The    only fear here is that Swansons battle with Doo Ho Choi    irrevocably altered his career (a thing that has been known to    happen with post-Fight of the Year candidates). However, I    dont think thats likely since the bulk of that fight was, in    actuality, Swanson putting the wood to Choi.  <\/p>\n<p>    The pick is Swanson by third-round knockout, but theres very    little meat on these bones so better to pass on betting.  <\/p>\n<p>    Breakdown  <\/p>\n<p>    The co-main event of the evening is also a strange one.    Al    Iaquinta, a man who retired from MMA recently (and may or    may not really want to keep fighting), faces Diego    Sanchez, a stalwart from the first TUF (who seemingly wants    to keep fighting past what is good for him). A win for Iaquinta    puts him back in the top-15 position, while a win for Sanchez    lands him in the vicinity of that conversation as well.  <\/p>\n<p>    When last we saw him, Iaquinta had developed into one of the    more technical boxers in the division. He pumped a frequent jab    and had solid footwork, allowing him cut angles for his    excellent counter-punching game. Assuming hes still the same    guy, Iaquinta mixes his levels of attack well and works his    combinations at a good pace. He also has pretty sharp defense    anchored by strong head movement in the pocket. He ties    everything together with stalwart takedown defense that can    thwart all but the very best wrestlers.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sanchez is one of the most well-known commodities in the UFC.    Hes a high-octane southpaw who is more than happy to throw    hands, but does his best work as a top position grappler. On    the feet Sanchez presses forward and throws hard combinations,    but hes not much of a technician, and his lack of defense    means his willingness to brawl is more of a liability than a    benefit. What his brawling mentality does accomplish    is win rounds in the eyes of the judges, despite sometimes    getting out-landed. His age and deteriorating durability make    this a much more dangerous gambit than it used to be.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sanchez really butters his beak as a wrestler and grappler    though. As you can see from the stats, hes not a particularly    deft finisher of takedowns, but he is tenacious. When you    continually shoot shot after shot, your percentage is going to    be low. Once on top, Sanchez can really start going to town,    working the opponent over with punches and control and racking    up damage in short order.  <\/p>\n<p>    The biggest question in this one is this: How is Iaquinta going    to look after two years away from competition? Sanchez is in    his twilight, but hes still not a fighter you want to face if    your heart isnt in it; there are very few men who want it    more than Sanchez.  <\/p>\n<p>    All that said, this is a dreadful style matchup for Sanchez.    Ragin Al is a much better striker and Lionheart wont be    able to get him to the mat. Expect Iaquinta to box Sanchez up    for 15 minutes before taking a wide decision, but be mindful of    putting money on a guy coming back from a two-year layoff and    facing a man whos won a questionable decision or two in his    time.  <\/p>\n<p>    Breakdown  <\/p>\n<p>    In the evenings only light heavyweight contest, former interim    title challenger Ovince    Saint Preux takes on the hard hitting     Marcos Rogerio de Lima. Saint Preux is in desperate need of    a win to stop his three-fight losing streak, while de Lima is    looking to notch the biggest win of his career and announce    himself as a force in the ultra-thin 205-pound division.  <\/p>\n<p>    Saint Preux is a former University of Tennessee football    player, and as you might expect, hes a phenomenal athlete. In    fact, I've often felt he resembles a Jon Jones    from earlier in his career. Saint Preux has similar ridiculous    physical gifts that allow him to perform funky, unpredictable    offensive feats. However, unlike Jones, OSP hasnt built up the    fundamentals that create a cohesive and threatening fighter.    The end result is that OSP might pop off and ruin anyones day,    but he might just as easily lose fights he should win on paper.  <\/p>\n<p>    As a striker, OSP is huge and rangy with an 80-inch southpaw    reach. He has an awkward striking game built around power and    speed and hes a good counter-puncher because of his timing.    He's not a phenomenally technical wrestler, but he's explosive    enough  and physical enough  to score takedowns and his top    game includes potent striking and unorthodox submissions. His    biggest weakness other than inconsistency in process is his    cardio which takes the sting out of his offense after a couple    of rounds.  <\/p>\n<p>    Cardio isnt a strong suit for de Lima either because the    Brazilian is an all-out fighter. De Lima throws caution to the    wind from the opening bell and unloads vicious punches and    kicks, breaking opponents under the ferocity of his attack.    Because hes an enormous, powerful man, this strategy has    proven effective, though its always a gamble. If his opponent    can weather the storm, de Lima is basically dead in the water.    Furthermore, as the numbers would suggest, de Lima is a horrid    defender of takedowns, and that  given his cardio troubles     make him a dangerous, if easily exploitable, fighter.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is basically a question of whether or not you think de    Lima can bulldoze Saint Preux early. While its entirely    possible that he can, de Limas defensive wrestling gives me    pause that he will. OSP isnt the best wrestler in the world    but hes good enough to take de Lima down. The pick is OSP by    TKO, late in the first round, and if he dropped to the -150    range, I like him for a bet.  <\/p>\n<p>    Breakdown  <\/p>\n<p>    One of the few fights with real stakes on the card, former    flyweight title contender John    Dodson is looking to rebound from his controversial split    decision loss to John    Lineker by taking on former bantamweight title challenger    Eddie    Wineland in a fight that will keep the winner relevant in    the divisional title picture.  <\/p>\n<p>    Dodson is one of the best pure athletes in MMA. Among the    fastest men at flyweight since moving to 135 pounds, Dodson is    a blur to most of his opponents. It isnt just his blinding    speed though; Dodsons also one of the pound-for-pound biggest    punchers in the entire sport. With the recent retirement of    Anthony    Johnson, you could argue he now occupies the top spot.  <\/p>\n<p>    But Dodson's hyper-athleticism and power are a double-edged    sword. Like Yoel    Romero, Dodson is often confoundingly inactive, lying in    wait for the moment to go hyper-dynamic on his opponent. Dodson    has the speed, technique, and skill to beat anyone at 135    pounds and below, but his suspect cardio and poor    decision-making have cost him time and again. That said, in his    last fight Dodson put forth a focused, intelligent game plan    that should have been enough for him to get the win. If Dodson    has finally learned to put some process behind his natural    talents, the rest of the division better watch out.  <\/p>\n<p>    Wineland is also a striker though far less dynamic than Dodson.    Hes a sharp boxer that operates behind a stiff, punishing jab.    From there he moves laterally and cuts angles to find openings    for his combinations. Hes defensively solid if you can get    over the fact that he carries his hands low, but like Dominick    Cruz, he does this to goad opponents into head hunting    where his excellent head movement and footwork allows him to    slip and counter with power. Hes also a stalwart defender of    takedowns which lets him operate in his preferred phase of    attack. Thats mostly the extent of the 32-year old Winelands    game, and  though hes on a winning streak  there are    legitimate concerns that, after 15 years of fighting, he may be    on his decline.  <\/p>\n<p>    The last time Wineland fought a powerful striker who was faster    and more athletic than him, he was marking up Renan    Barao before catching a shotgun blast to the face. That is    more or less how I see this fight going. Wineland is a skilled    striker and his size and technique can create problems for the    diminutive Dodson but eventually The Magician is gonna plunk    him in the side of the head and thatll be the ball game. I    like Dodson to win by second-round KO. Betting Wineland is    actually justifiable but if youre going to do so, only go    small.  <\/p>\n<p>    Breakdown  <\/p>\n<p>    Joe    Lauzon meets Stevie Ray in a competitive lightweight scrap    that doesnt have much divisional relevance but should be fun    nonetheless.  <\/p>\n<p>    Aggression is the name of Lauzon's game. He's a powerful    puncher and wrestler who comes out of the gate like hell on    wheels, leading to him being one of the all-time leaders in    bonus award wins. That aggression also has the downside of    meaning he tends to fade pretty hard in fights if one can    weather the storm (he has two decision wins in a 39-fight    career). However, he has lately been pacing himself more and    remaining competitive past the 8-minute mark.  <\/p>\n<p>    On the feet, Lauzon mostly throws big power strikes, moving    forward and either shooting a takedown or grabbing the clinch.    His defense is poor (look at those stats), but hes got a good    chin and his pressure makes up for it. Hes a nasty clinch    fighter, and on the floor, hes a fierce transitional grappler    with excellent ground and pound.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ray is a southpaw striker and a fairly deft one at that. He    prefers to throw in one and two punch salvos, dictating pace    and distance with one-two's and lead left hands. He also has an    array of kicks but those are most thrown as a way to set the    range and not as a real damaging attack. Ray is constantly    moving on his feet, circling and resetting the distance to look    for his preferred angle of attack. This style of attack means    his volume is a little low, but when he does sit down on his    punches they have some good pop. Beyond that, theres not much    else to Rays game. His takedown defense is still a work in    progress, and on the mat, hes a competent grappler but not    really a threatening one.  <\/p>\n<p>    This fight mostly depends on how well Ray can stay on his feet.    If Lauzon can work takedowns, he should maul Ray on the mat. If    Ray has improves his defensive wrestling enough, Lauzon is too    hittable to win the rounds. The former seems much more like and    Lauzon can at least compete on the feet until he can get his    wrestling going. Also, Lauzon should own the clinch here. The    only worry for Lauzon really is getting hit coming in, and    while he has a lot of miles on him, Lauzons still proven to be    a durable guy and Ray isnt a huge threat to finish. This pick    is Lauzon to win a decision and I like him for a bet at these    long of odds.  <\/p>\n<p>    Breakdown  <\/p>\n<p>    A potential banger of a welterweight matchup opens up the FS1    main card. Jake    Ellenberger is coming off a slightly controversial loss to    Jorge    Masvidal whereas Mike    Perry tasted defeat for the first time in his most recent    outing against Alan    Jouban. Both men need a win here to remain relevant in the    division, and while Perry is looking to take down the first    real name fighter of his career, Ellenbergers job may be on    the line here.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ellenberger is one of the more frustrating fighters in the    world. Hes a great athlete with all the tools to excel in the    upper echelons of MMA (and, for a time, he did just that) but    the last four years have been plagued by inconsistency for the    Nebraskan. When hes on point, power is the name of the game    for Ellenberger. He blends some of the hardest punching in the    division with an explosive wrestling game. However, more often    than not it looks like Ellenberger doesnt want to be in the    cage and his lack of urgency has been anathema to victory for    the one-time title hopeful.  <\/p>\n<p>    On the other side, a lack of fight enthusiasm is certainly not    Perrys problem. Perry turned heads with his boisterous debut    last year, knocking out Hyun Gyu    Lim at UFC 202    after some    antics at the weigh-ins beforehand. While his personality    has made Perry a guy the UFC is keen on, his skills are not to    be overlooked. Though still young in his career, Perry has many    of the hallmarks of a fighter with a bright future. He's a    great athlete with tremendous speed and power and he pushes a    very high pace. His striking game is narrow  relying mostly on    a left hook and overhand right, supplemented by leg kicks  and    he doesn't try to get too far outside his wheelhouse but his    natural timing and sense of when and where openings should be    exploited makes him highly effective. There is a depth to his    game that belies his young age and given some development,    Perry could be a legitimate threat in the division.  <\/p>\n<p>    As is always the case with Ellenberger, this fight isnt so    much a matter of if he has the skills to win  he does  but    does he really want to compete? Even if he does, Perry is a    pretty tough style matchup for him as durability and volume    have never been strong suits for The Juggernaut. Ellenberger    has the wrestling chops to make Perry work but in a contest    between a fighter with questionable intensity and one with    multiple face tattoos, you have to go with the latter. Perry    scores a knockout at the end of the first round and he should    probably be in the -200 to -220 range so I like him for a bet.  <\/p>\n<p>    Thales    Leites (-115\/53%) vs. Sam    Alvey (-105\/51%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Leites has been in MMA long enough to have skills in all    phases. On the feet, hes a good counter-puncher with    legitimate power but he butters his bread as a top position    grappler. He's a solid chain-wrestler from the clinch and once    he's on top he has a great pass and punch game to go along with    his elite submissions. Alvey is a relatively slow-paced (though    he throws more than Leites) southpaw with big power and    outstanding takedown defense. His biggest weakness is that he    relies almost entirely on the counter which means he is prone    to giving rounds away due to inactivity.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is a pretty rough style matchup for Leites. Alveys    stellar defensive wrestling mean Leites will mostly be forced    into striking where his pressuring game puts him right in the    wheelhouse of Alveys counters. But if Leites chin can hold up     something it has been doing a good job of against stiff    competition  then his pressure might be able to win rounds    from Alvey who is taking a pretty big leap up in competition.    Still though, this is a fight between guys trending in opposite    directions and in those situations, hitch your wagon to the    rocket not the anchor. The pick is Alvey by third-round    knockout and I like him for a bet.  <\/p>\n<p>    Dustin    Ortiz (-190\/66%) vs.     Brandon Moreno (+170\/37%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Ortiz is a talent flyweight who has only lost to the best in    the division; it just so happens that three of his last five    fights have been against Wilson    Reis, Jussier    Formiga, and Joseph    Benavidez. Hes a scramble-based grappler who can exchange    on the feet as well but hes not the best athlete or technician    and thats why he has fallen short against the elite of the    division. Moreno is an up-and-coming flyweight who has    impressed in the UFC after getting bounced early from TUF 24.    Hes dangerous in all phases with good combination boxing and a    talent for sneaking to the back.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ortiz struggles against guys who are more athletic than him and    can win the scrambles, two categories under which Moreno falls.    Moreno also has a five-inch reach advantage and hes more    active on the feet. This will be a fun, back and forth affair    but Moreno should come out ahead more often than not. The pick    is Moreno by decision and I love him for a bet at these odds.  <\/p>\n<p>        Scott Holtzman (-380\/79%) vs.        Michael McBride (+320\/24%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Holtzman can fight everywhere though none of it will wow you.    Hes physically strong and a decent athlete, with solid    wrestling and top control as well as good elbows in the clinch.    McBride doesnt have a lot of tape on him other than the    kicking he suffered at the hands of Nik Lentz    his last time out. Hes a tall lightweight who prefers to    grapple and his striking needs a good deal of work.  <\/p>\n<p>    The athletic gulf in this contest looks to be substantial.    Holtzman is hittable on the feet but he throws competent    combinations with some pop on them whereas McBride leaves his    head on a tee and throws from his hips. Holtzman is a good    enough wrestler to keep things standing and in the clinch and    at range, he should bust up McBride. The pick is Holtzman by    TKO in the latter half of the fight but since I still havent    seen a ton of McBride, I wouldnt bet this.  <\/p>\n<p>        Jessica Penne (-130\/57%) vs.        Danielle Taylor (+110\/48%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Penne is a former title challenger whos made her way based on    her grappling skills. On the feet, she has solid technique but    she doesnt sit out on here punches and shes far too hittable,    though she is shoe leather tough. On the mat, shes a potent    combination of sweeps from the bottom and passing + control    from the top. Taylor has a background in Muay Thai and shes    still a striker in MMA but at 5 feet tall, shes adapted her    game to a more fitting style. Taylor prefers to stay at range    before leaping in for single-shot punches that are thrown with    power. Shes speedy and mobile with this plan and her right    hand packs a wallop, but its a low volume attack that doesnt    score well with judges unless she connects with something    clean.  <\/p>\n<p>    The simple truth is, Taylor is an atomweight and she isnt just    slightly undersized, shes wildly undersized at strawweight.    Penne will have a 5-inch height advantage and a 7-inch reach    advantage come fight night. Moreover, Taylor has been muscled    around in the clinch before as a result of her diminutive    stature, and Penne is likely to do the same here and on the    floor. The pick is Penne by submission in the third round and    shes a fine bet at these odds.  <\/p>\n<p>    Alexis    Davis (-300\/75%) vs.     Cindy Dandois (+250\/29%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Davis is a jack of all trades fighter who fought for the UFC    bantamweight title once upon a time, getting obliterated by    Ronda    Rousey in 16 seconds. Despite that quick failing, Davis is    a very durable fighter who works aggressive, combination boxing    on the feet and a swift, lethal attack on the floor.  <\/p>\n<p>    Dandois is basically like if a blind person with only a loose    grasp of MMA tried to build Ronda Rousey in create-a-fighter    mode on a UFC game. Shes a judoka of some accomplishment on    the European circuit and that is the beginning and end of her    game. She uses head throws and her long legs to attack while on    the ground.  <\/p>\n<p>    Once she makes her debut, Dandois will possibly be the worst    striker in the modern era of the UFC. Davis isnt Sugar Ray but    shes a spirited boxer and an excellent grappler in her own    right and I would be shocked if she didnt put the wood to    Dandois here. Then again, Dandois has managed wins over        Marloes Coenen and Megan    Anderson so I guess anything is possible. Still, Davis by    TKO in the middle of the fight, and if you want to throw her in    a parlay, go for it.  <\/p>\n<p>        Bryan Barberena (-320\/76%) vs.    Joe    Proctor (+265\/27%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Barberena is a rugged, durable fighter who lacks the    athleticism to compete at the highest levels of the sport but    is a tough out for anyone. He pressures in combination on the    feet and hes good in the clinch and on top but he rarely looks    to take it to the ground. Proctor hasnt competed in over a    year due to injury. Hes a striker with good power and an    aggressive submission game when things hit the floor or he has    an opponent hurt.  <\/p>\n<p>    This fight figures to be a good, old-fashioned dust up between    two guys with no interest in taking the other down. Proctor is    faster and has more power but Barberena is more durable and    throws more volume as well as being the better clinch fighter.    Barberenas toughness means he should walk through Proctors    early offense and take control in the clinch and at range where    Proctor is hittable. The pick is Barberena by decision but the    odds are long on him so pass on a bet.  <\/p>\n<p>        Hector Sandoval (-125\/56%) vs.    Matt    Schnell (+105\/49%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Sandoval is a squat, athletic wrestle-boxer from Team Alpha    Male. His offense is built around slinging heavy overhand    rights and following them up with lefts to the body or    explosive double-leg shots. Schnell is tall for the division at    5-foot-8 and he uses his length to his advantage, snapping off    combinations that he punctuates with leg kicks on the feet and    using his long legs to attack relentlessly from the bottom with    armbars and triangles.  <\/p>\n<p>    Things dont look good for Sandoval here. Hes giving up six    inches of height and six inches of reach to Schnell and his    tendency to stand outside of his opponents and then explode    forward wont work nearly as well with that much distance to    cover. Even if he does succeed with his takedowns, Schnell is    too tricky off his back and will have Sandoval playing defense    all night. The pick is Schnell by submission in the second    round. And I like him for a bet at plus money.  <\/p>\n<p>    That's all folks. We had a good showing last weekend, going 3-2    on our bets  with two of those being underdogs  for a total    earning of +227. Hopefully we will do as well this week. For    those of a more auditory inclination, I broke down fights with    Nick Baldwin and Wes Riddle on Before The Battle, so heres    that.  <\/p>\n<p>    Otherwise, enjoy the fights everyone, good luck to those who    need it, if you've got any questions, feel free to hit me up on    Twitter @JedKMeshew.  <\/p>\n<p>    (Editor's note: All of this advice is for    entertainment purposes only.)  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the rest here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.mmafighting.com\/2017\/4\/22\/15381272\/ufc-fight-night-108-odds-gambling-guide-cub-swanson-artem-lobov-al-iaquinta-diego-sanchez\" title=\"UFC Fight Night 108 odds, gambling guide - MMA Fighting\">UFC Fight Night 108 odds, gambling guide - MMA Fighting<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Welcome MMA bettors, speculators, and gambling lurkers! Were back at it again for another week of comprehensive gambling analysis from your friends at MMA Fighting.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/gambling\/ufc-fight-night-108-odds-gambling-guide-mma-fighting\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187831],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189229","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gambling"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189229"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189229"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189229\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189229"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189229"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189229"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}