{"id":189202,"date":"2017-04-23T01:23:38","date_gmt":"2017-04-23T05:23:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-market-policies-economic-competitiveness-business-national-review\/"},"modified":"2017-04-23T01:23:38","modified_gmt":"2017-04-23T05:23:38","slug":"free-market-policies-economic-competitiveness-business-national-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fiscal-freedom\/free-market-policies-economic-competitiveness-business-national-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Free-Market Policies &amp; Economic Competitiveness: Business &#8230; &#8211; National Review"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The tenth edition of the Rich    States, Poor States: ALEC-Laffer State Economic Competitiveness    Index has just been released, and once again, Utah was    found to have the best economic outlook of any state in the    nation. The rankings are based on 15 equally-weighted economic    policy variables, including tax rates, labor policy, and    regulatory climate. They continue to show that states valuing    economic freedom and competitiveness outperform states adhering    to the tax-and-spend model, with state economic policies having    a substantial effect on where businesses and individuals choose    to set up shop.  <\/p>\n<p>    Taxes matter for economic competitiveness. People and    businesses often seek out lower tax burdens across state lines.    Rich States, Poor States data shows states that keep    taxes low, avoid job-killing over-regulation, and follow    prudent budget practices consistently and significantly    outperform their highly taxed, over-regulated counterparts.    Shown below are the top- and bottom-ten states in terms of    economic outlook for 2017. Over the past decade, two states    have made the top ten in the rankings every single year: Utah    and Wyoming. In fact, after enacting tax cuts, a flat tax, and    pension reforms, Utah has earned the top spot in all ten    editions of Rich States, Poor States  a truly    impressive accomplishment. On the other side of the spectrum,    New York and Vermont have managed to land in the bottom ten    each of the past ten years.  <\/p>\n<p>    This year, several states earned their best all time rankings    in Rich States, Poor States. After enacting    right-to-work legislation and aggressively cutting tax rates,    Indiana, which sat at 24th as recently as 2012, claimed the    second-best economic outlook in the nation this year. Texas and    New Hampshire both also saw significant improvement in the 2017    rankings, earning their best marks to date.  <\/p>\n<p>    By examining state-by-state migration trends, it is easy to see    which states are enacting pro-growth policies. After all,    Americans have shown that they are willing to vote with their    feet for better economic opportunities even if it means    leaving their home state. The top-ten states in the 2017    rankings have gained more than 3.75 million residents in the    past decade. The bottom-ten states, meanwhile, have lost more    than 3.78 million residents over the same period. In addition    to experiencing a mass exodus of residents, states with    oppressively high tax rates such as New York, Illinois, and    California have lost vast economic opportunities and vast    amounts of wealth. Job growth over the last ten years was    nearly three times higher in the top ten states than it was in    the bottom ten.  <\/p>\n<p>    When state governments enact bad policy, individuals and    corporations react rationally, working less, investing less, or    moving to a more business-friendly state altogether.    Growth-oriented states routinely prioritize core services in    their budgets while minimizing the tax burden on residents.    Poorly ranked states in the Index consistently stifle    growth with higher taxes and increased regulation.  <\/p>\n<p>    Of course, tax and fiscal policies are not the only predictors    of economic growth. Demographics, climate, natural resources,    and other geographic amenities remain important factors in    state economic growth as well. But even adjusting for these    other factors, states that embrace sound economic policies    vastly outperform those that dont. Coastal California may    enjoy a better climate in its ten-day forecast than Texas for    much of the year, but economic growth and migration patterns    strongly suggest that the Lone Star State has a brighter future    than the Golden State.  <\/p>\n<p>    While free markets and low taxes enable resources to flow in a    productive manner to meet the demands of consumers, markets    distorted by government through cronyism, taxes, and regulation    create lower output and stifle investment. In Rich States,    Poor States, the 50 laboratories of democracy give us    clear examples of this every year. Freedom works, and the    Index proves it.  <\/p>\n<p>     Jonathan Williams is the chief    economist and vice president of the American Legislative    Exchange Councils Center for State Fiscal Reform.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the rest here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/article\/446963\/free-markey-policies-economic-competitiveness-business-friendly-states-growing\" title=\"Free-Market Policies &amp; Economic Competitiveness: Business ... - National Review\">Free-Market Policies &amp; Economic Competitiveness: Business ... - National Review<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The tenth edition of the Rich States, Poor States: ALEC-Laffer State Economic Competitiveness Index has just been released, and once again, Utah was found to have the best economic outlook of any state in the nation.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fiscal-freedom\/free-market-policies-economic-competitiveness-business-national-review\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187823],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fiscal-freedom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189202"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189202"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189202\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}