{"id":189167,"date":"2017-04-23T01:06:21","date_gmt":"2017-04-23T05:06:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/one-big-question-what-will-space-exploration-look-like-in-2040-new-atlas\/"},"modified":"2017-04-23T01:06:21","modified_gmt":"2017-04-23T05:06:21","slug":"one-big-question-what-will-space-exploration-look-like-in-2040-new-atlas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/space-exploration\/one-big-question-what-will-space-exploration-look-like-in-2040-new-atlas\/","title":{"rendered":"One Big Question: What will space exploration look like in 2040? &#8211; New Atlas"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The 33rd annual Space Symposium wrapped up recently in    Colorado and New Atlas was on hand to check out some of the    exhibits and talks. Amidst the rocket models,    jet engines and satellites, we found a quiet corner to sit down    with Scott Fouse, the vice president of Lockheed Martin's    Advanced Technology Center. For our One    Big Question series, we wanted to get his thoughts on what    reaching for the stars will look like in the future, so we    asked him: What will space exploration look like in 2040?  <\/p>\n<p>    Oh, and, he was so rich with information that we broke our    regular format of asking only one question this time and threw    in a few follow-ups. We didn't think you would mind.  <\/p>\n<p>        More than 700 New Atlas Plus subscribers read our        newsletter and website without ads.      <\/p>\n<p>        Join them for just US$19 a year.      <\/p>\n<p>    Here's an edited version of our interview.  <\/p>\n<p>    One of the things we're we're doing right now is starting a    collaboration with Breakthrough Initiatives, led by former head of    the NASA Ames Research Center, Pete Worden. They do these kind    of far-out projects  one they're doing is called Breakthrough Starshot. The idea is they    want to visit the closest star, Alpha Centauri.  <\/p>\n<p>    To do that they're developing a single-chip spacecraft attached    to a light sail. The concept is that there will be a satellite    in orbit that will pop out one of these light sails, they'll    turn on the laser, hit it for two minutes and that will    accelerate it to .8 the speed of light. At that point it just    goes. And there's lots of very interesting cool technology    about how you build that single-chip spacecraft, and the light    sail itself is very interesting. It can be more than just a    sail, it can be an imaging sensor, it could be the aperture for    communicating. So that's a pretty far-off concept. In talking    with the guys, they're thinking that's a kind of 20 to 30-year    vision. So it's it's definitely in the ballpark of 2040 I    think.  <\/p>\n<p>    A little closer to home, you watch what's happening in our    daily lives and it's quite interesting how traditional    computers are disappearing and they're becoming embedded in our    fabric. Everything is a computer, so the times we sit with a    computer in front of us are diminishing  they're just always    around. So in a very similar way you can think today about what    a traditional satellite would look like tomorrow. Right now, we    build the structure and you put all these boxes inside, but for    us we're thinking at one point that all those boxes will become    embedded in the structure itself.  <\/p>\n<p>    So a few years ago we did a concept project called PrintSat    where we we actually developed a robotic cluster of additive    manufacturing tools and demonstrated this concept of printing    the satellite, where you've got embedded electronics and other    things right in the structure. It was a very early concept, and    there are lots of challenges right now because we don't yet    have systems-engineering tools that would allow us to reliably    do that. But I I have no doubt by 2040 those will be there.  <\/p>\n<p>    Part of it is that they'd be significantly lighter, because    with space it's all about the weight. Plus, think about the    cost savings in how we manufacture. Today it takes us two to    three years to build a fairly capable satellite. I might be    able to print a satellite maybe somewhere in the order of a    couple weeks or a month. And that would also be a significant    benefit, because you wouldn't actually have to have people    assembling it. Whenever you have this kind of touch labor, you    have the potential for mistakes to happen.  <\/p>\n<p>      One of the SPIDER sensors from Lockheed Martin (Credit:      Michael Franco\/New Atlas)    <\/p>\n<p>    One of the things we've been working on in our lab is a concept    we call SPIDER (Segmented Planar Imaging Detector    for Electro-optical Reconnaissance). You think about the    satellites for which we're doing optical systems and optical    sensors, and in order to do that you've got to have some kind    of lens or mirror to form the image. And the quality of the    image is going to be directly linked to the quality of that    mirror, which is also kind of a long-lead item. So I want to    not use a lens, but build it as a true flat optical sensor. So    for the whole image-formation process, we're going to do that    using integrated photonics that sit behind that image. We've    actually done a prototype of one of those right now funded by    DARPA, but it's very early. But I honestly believe by 2040 that    will be there.<\/p>\n<p>    You can go back to this concept that it's all printed in the    structure. And you basically get a sensor with all of the    computation behind it. We do Earth sites at Lockheed where    we're staring at the Earth, but we also do heliophysics where    we're staring at the sun. Such an optical sensor would be a    perfect thing for that. And with 360-degree viewing possible,    you could also be looking around and making sure there aren't    satellites or other things around and assume a kind of    defensive posture.  <\/p>\n<p>    It's actually fairly interesting because it uses some of the    same principles that go all the way back to early radio    astronomy where you had multiple radio telescopes and images    were made by combining their signals. And that's what this is    doing for interferometric imaging. And so it's just using    tried-and-true principles of image formation but now doing it a    very interesting scale.  <\/p>\n<p>    One of the other things I fully expect to happen are very    low-cost, highly capable lasers. I think we'll see more of    that. Not only will it allow satellites to communicate with    each other, but maybe more importantly, we can get to where we    have very precise relative location between satellites. In    terms of the optical sensors, that would allow us to create a    much larger aperture by having multiple telescopes so we can    get a very high-fidelity image.  <\/p>\n<p>    Right now if I have a satellite with a one-meter aperture, and    I have a number of those, I could probably get to being able to    form an image where it will be as if I have a 100-meter    telescope. But in order to do that, you've got to have really    precise relative location. And that's another concept we're    starting to work on.  <\/p>\n<p>    One of the other things we think is going to be happening by    2040, and again, you're starting to see the earliest examples    of it now, is satellite servicing. Over the last few years    Lockheed has been exploring the notion of just being able to go    up there and refuel satellites. But we think realistically with    the robotics technology that will be there, you'll have systems    that will actually be able to service and repair satellites.  <\/p>\n<p>    And the other thing we've talked about is that we may start    making the satellites inside out, so that literally, this    robotic servicer can go in there and replace boards, which    means I could fly a satellite and then three or four years    later upgrade it in terms of its computational power or storage    power.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is where (Lockheed executive vice president) Rick Ambrose    likes to talk about the notion of a software-defined satellite.    You see it on fighter aircraft right now. Probably 80 percent    of the capability of the F-35    is being driven by the software, so it's a software-defined    fighter, right? Well, we can do that with satellites.  <\/p>\n<p>    You see it with Tesla too. Tesla does these software updates    and all of a sudden you've got a half dozen new capabilities in    your car. So that that will be a big part of it. It'll be    interesting to watch this space and see if it will eventually    be better to repair the satellites up there or launch new ones.  <\/p>\n<p>    A big area that's for me a little bit more of a passion is this    whole human\/machine teaming. Just how do we leverage all of the    capabilities of automation, AI, big data analytics, deep    learning, and other technologies, and couple that with the    human to make a more powerful human\/machine pairing?  <\/p>\n<p>    We have a guy named Bill Casebeer and he's building a team    called \"human performance augmentation.\" His work involves the    area where the machine understands your state and based on that    state, will do things to enhance the overall human\/machine    performance. And Bill is actually a neuroscientist so he's    really trying to understand how people think and trying to    drive the research to where you get peak performance.  <\/p>\n<p>    A good friend of mine is a DARPA program manager  he's the guy    actually whose project spun out Siri  and he just went back to DARPA again    and he's doing a project on explainable AI.  <\/p>\n<p>    When you think about how we do collaboration, you ask the    question and I give you an answer, but then I'll explain more.    If all you ever have is the answer, there's no way for us to    develop trust; we need to understand how you're thinking about    the world. So he's trying to now build that in. They are just    now kicking off a whole new program on explainable AI. So to me    that's a key part of it.  <\/p>\n<p>    One of the things that's very interesting is that both the    computational power and also the kind of software technologies    are currently developed to where we can start to do this kind    of stuff. I was part of a small AI company 30 years ago and we    were talking about these things then, but the computational    horsepower just wasn't there. But when you look at what the    human brain is like and you look at what kind of computing    power we have today, we're approaching that.  <\/p>\n<p>    And so I fully expect that this is going to be an aspect of how    we see what plays out in space clearly in the 2040 timeframe.    We're already seeing it a lot in the military space.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Follow this link:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/newatlas.com\/space-exploration-future-lockheed-martin\/49104\/\" title=\"One Big Question: What will space exploration look like in 2040? - New Atlas\">One Big Question: What will space exploration look like in 2040? - New Atlas<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The 33rd annual Space Symposium wrapped up recently in Colorado and New Atlas was on hand to check out some of the exhibits and talks. Amidst the rocket models, jet engines and satellites, we found a quiet corner to sit down with Scott Fouse, the vice president of Lockheed Martin's Advanced Technology Center. For our One Big Question series, we wanted to get his thoughts on what reaching for the stars will look like in the future, so we asked him: What will space exploration look like in 2040 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/space-exploration\/one-big-question-what-will-space-exploration-look-like-in-2040-new-atlas\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187764],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189167","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-space-exploration"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189167"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189167"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189167\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189167"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189167"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189167"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}