{"id":188994,"date":"2017-04-23T00:21:05","date_gmt":"2017-04-23T04:21:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/a-liberty-movement-divided-against-itself-cannot-stand-being-libertarian\/"},"modified":"2017-04-23T00:21:05","modified_gmt":"2017-04-23T04:21:05","slug":"a-liberty-movement-divided-against-itself-cannot-stand-being-libertarian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/libertarianism\/a-liberty-movement-divided-against-itself-cannot-stand-being-libertarian\/","title":{"rendered":"A Liberty Movement, Divided Against Itself, Cannot Stand &#8211; Being Libertarian"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    It is an unfortunate truth that, as the liberty movement gains    traction in the political arena and becomes more diverse, we    are going to face our fair share of hurdles when it comes to    ideological differences on some hot-button issues. Issues such    as drug use and the legality and acceptance of abortion have    plagued the party in recent days. A house divided against    itself cannot stand, and if we in the liberty movement want to    continue to gain traction and stay relevant, then we must    address the proverbial elephant in the room.  <\/p>\n<p>    Addressing the division within the movement will be no easy    task. Many of us have very deep-seated moral objections against    allowing certain actions in a libertarian society, and each of    us are entitled to our individual opinions on the subject. The    division happens when we try to find the one truly    libertarian stance on any one of these issues. Considering    that, libertarianism values individual freedom highly and is    comprised of such a diverse group of individuals, it can be    assumed with relative certainty that we will never find a    singular libertarian position.  <\/p>\n<p>    What can be done about this division? How can we address these    issues and not look like the dysfunctional laughing stock of    American politics? We obviously cant simply sweep these issues    under the rug or ignore them; eventually they will need to be    addressed. What I propose is a plan where we return to the    basics. We all joined this movement for a reason and we all did    so of our own free will. The Libertarian Party is driven on    principle, rather than politics. What this means is that, we as    libertarians are not driven by a desire for political power or    position, nor are we interested in forcing our views of    morality on others. We are driven by the idea of liberty and    non-aggression.  <\/p>\n<p>    While the issues are important and should be addressed, they    are not the foundation on which the Libertarian Party is laid.    The core principles of liberty and non-aggression must be first    and foremost in the mind of any libertarian that wishes to    attract more people to this movement, and thus make an impact    on society. Constant infighting and purity tests not only    further the divide between libertarians, but also serve to    deter some would-be libertarians from wishing to be involved in    such a tumultuous party.  <\/p>\n<p>    Libertarianism is not an exact science, and I dont claim to    have all the answers on what should be done about the issues we    face today. However, I do believe that my proposal can help to    quell the intensity of the infighting amongst us. These issues    must be approached in a liberty-first mindset, and we as    libertarians have to accept that not everyone thinks like we    do. That fact alone does not make them more or less libertarian    than anyone else, so long as they believe in non-aggression and    individual liberty. United on those two guiding principles, we    can move forward and change this country, and possibly even the    world.  <\/p>\n<p>    In short, its time for us as libertarians to remember why    were here. We are united under the basic premise that good    ideas dont require force, especially government force. Be the    change you want to see in the liberty movement and society.    Stop trying to force other libertarians to conform to your idea    of what libertarianism is, just as we want the powers that be    to stop forcing their respective ideas and plans for society on    us, their constituents.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Image     Source  <\/p>\n<p>    Corey Todd was born and raised in Lakeland, Florida. He is    still new to the movement and currently on active duty in the    United States Marine Corps. The views expressed in his article    are his own personal views and not those held by the USMC,    Dept. of the Navy, or DOD.  <\/p>\n<p>      Like Loading...    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more from the original source:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/beinglibertarian.com\/liberty-movement-divided-cannot-stand\/\" title=\"A Liberty Movement, Divided Against Itself, Cannot Stand - Being Libertarian\">A Liberty Movement, Divided Against Itself, Cannot Stand - Being Libertarian<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> It is an unfortunate truth that, as the liberty movement gains traction in the political arena and becomes more diverse, we are going to face our fair share of hurdles when it comes to ideological differences on some hot-button issues. Issues such as drug use and the legality and acceptance of abortion have plagued the party in recent days. A house divided against itself cannot stand, and if we in the liberty movement want to continue to gain traction and stay relevant, then we must address the proverbial elephant in the room.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/libertarianism\/a-liberty-movement-divided-against-itself-cannot-stand-being-libertarian\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-188994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-libertarianism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188994"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188994"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188994\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}