{"id":188981,"date":"2017-04-21T02:58:54","date_gmt":"2017-04-21T06:58:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/cisco-had-a-hand-in-chinese-oppression-sect-says-courthouse-news-service\/"},"modified":"2017-04-21T02:58:54","modified_gmt":"2017-04-21T06:58:54","slug":"cisco-had-a-hand-in-chinese-oppression-sect-says-courthouse-news-service","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/government-oppression\/cisco-had-a-hand-in-chinese-oppression-sect-says-courthouse-news-service\/","title":{"rendered":"Cisco Had a Hand in Chinese Oppression, Sect Says &#8211; Courthouse News Service"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    SAN FRANCISCO (CN)  An argument before the Ninth Circuit on    Tuesday hinged on whether Cisco Systems intentionally assisted    the Chinese government in its persecution of practitioners of a    religion called Falun Gong.  <\/p>\n<p>    The appellants claim a federal judges decision in 2014 that a    group of Chinese and U.S. citizens could not pursue their    claims against Cisco due to jurisdictional issues was    incorrect.  <\/p>\n<p>    Instead, their attorney Paul Hoffman argued Cisco manufactured    a surveillance software program with explicit knowledge the    Chinese government would use it to identify, arrest and in some    cases torture and kill members of a religious sect.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ciscos attorney Kathleen Sullivan acknowledged the    human-rights violations laid out in the complaint were    odious, but said Cisco didnt bear any responsibility.  <\/p>\n<p>    This lawsuit is inappropriate to bring against a company that    lawfully exported internet infrastructure to China, Sullivan    told the three-judge panel.  <\/p>\n<p>    To punish U.S. companies for the actions of a foreign    government amounts to an end-around of U.S. foreign policy and    opens a Pandoras Box, she said.  <\/p>\n<p>    But Hoffman said the case was akin to others where a company    actively participated in a program they knew was being used to    violate human rights.  <\/p>\n<p>    The allegations go far beyond that, Hoffman said.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Chinese Community Party has attempted to suppress Falun    Gong since the 1990s.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Falun Gong is a religion with both Buddhist and Taoist    influences, combining meditation and spiritual exercises with a    moral philosophy that emphasizes truthfulness, compassion and    tolerance.  <\/p>\n<p>    After its founding in 1992 by Li Hongzhi, the modern mind-body    practice spread quickly throughout China, garnering as many as    70 million followers in 1999.  <\/p>\n<p>    Around that time, the Chinese Communist Party began to view the    religion as a threat, and enacted a crackdown and propaganda    effort aimed at snuffing out the burgeoning practice.  <\/p>\n<p>    This effort reportedly involved forced conversions, labor    camps, extrajudicial killings, psychiatric abuse and other    abusive forms of brainwashing perpetrated by the Chinese    government.  <\/p>\n<p>    Hoffmans clients, consisting of an assortment of U.S. and    Chinese citizens, say they were subjected to the abuses and    claim Cisco was at least partially responsible.  <\/p>\n<p>    In their 2011 lawsuit, the members of Falun Gong say Cisco    developed a surveillance software called Golden Shield and then    customized it with the specific intent to help the Chinese    government identify and track down members despite knowing    about the human-rights violations.  <\/p>\n<p>    They didnt just develop the software, they developed an    entire system to designed to collect information and these    peoples backgrounds, and that information was used for the    advancement of this persecution Hoffman said at the hearing.  <\/p>\n<p>    The lawsuit was initially dismissed by U.S. District Judge    Edward Davila on technical grounds, agreeing with Cisco that    the federal courts are not the appropriate venue for the case.  <\/p>\n<p>    Circuit Judge Marsha Berzon attempted to delve into whether the    softwares development in San Jose could trigger jurisdiction.    But Sullivan said the religious groups claims about Ciscos    actions in the Silicon Valley are vague and unspecific.  <\/p>\n<p>    At one point, Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt asked whether    Ciscos actions could be compared to a company that makes the    nerve gas Syrian President Bashar Assad used on his own people    last month, and whether that constituted aiding and abetting.  <\/p>\n<p>    Yes, but that is not what happened in this case, Sullivan    said, adding none of the Cisco executives named in the lawsuit    knew or believed they were aiding and abetting Chinas    human-rights violations.  <\/p>\n<p>    The panel is expected to rule in the coming weeks.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>More here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.courthousenews.com\/cisco-hand-chinese-oppression-sect-says\/\" title=\"Cisco Had a Hand in Chinese Oppression, Sect Says - Courthouse News Service\">Cisco Had a Hand in Chinese Oppression, Sect Says - Courthouse News Service<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> SAN FRANCISCO (CN) An argument before the Ninth Circuit on Tuesday hinged on whether Cisco Systems intentionally assisted the Chinese government in its persecution of practitioners of a religion called Falun Gong. The appellants claim a federal judges decision in 2014 that a group of Chinese and U.S <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/government-oppression\/cisco-had-a-hand-in-chinese-oppression-sect-says-courthouse-news-service\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187833],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-188981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-government-oppression"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188981"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188981"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188981\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}