{"id":188946,"date":"2017-04-21T02:53:12","date_gmt":"2017-04-21T06:53:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/the-stench-of-liberal-hypocrisy-heat-street\/"},"modified":"2017-04-21T02:53:12","modified_gmt":"2017-04-21T06:53:12","slug":"the-stench-of-liberal-hypocrisy-heat-street","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/liberal\/the-stench-of-liberal-hypocrisy-heat-street\/","title":{"rendered":"The Stench of Liberal Hypocrisy &#8211; Heat Street"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The departure of Fox News hostBill OReilly over    allegations of inappropriate conduct has, predictably, caused a    certain amount of exultation from liberal and left-leaning    stars and commentators.  <\/p>\n<p>    Cher tweeted that OReilly and Donald Trump have sexually    harassed women 4 years without providing any concrete examples    to back up this claim. Rosie ODonnell followed suit, calling    Trump and OReilly sexual predators of a feather. (She also    failed to expand on this extreme accusation). And Stephen King    said Trump and OReilly are both members of the odious boys    club where members feel they can abuse and humiliate women at    will. Again, he did not produce a shred of evidence.  <\/p>\n<p>    The question is, where were these sanctimoniousvoices    when members of their own club were accused of what some might    judge to be far more inappropriate behavior than the king of    cable was? And why have they previously been content to see    others who have been accused of alleged crimes and misdemeanors    potentially elevated to positions of great authority, or    watched them receive the most prestigious of awards?  <\/p>\n<p>    Lets start with Bill Clinton. The former President has been    accused of sexual misconduct by three women (one, Juanita    Broaddrick has claimed he raped her) yet this apparently posed    no problem for liberals last year. They would have been happy    for the politico to re-enter the White House as First    Gentleman, while his long-suffering wife would have been    President.  <\/p>\n<p>    And what about film director Roman Polanski? He was named Best    Director at the Oscars in 2002 despite having fled America for    Europe in 1978 after being arrested and charged in the US with    engaging in unlawful sexual intercourse with a 13-year-old    girl. Harrison Ford accepted the Oscar for Polanski and then    presented it to him at the Deauville Film Festival in France    five months later in a public ceremony.  <\/p>\n<p>    Woody Allen has a long and deeply uncomfortable history of    allegations against him after his ex-wife, Mia Farrow, claimed    he sexually abused their adopted daughter. But, as with    Polanski, the liberal establishment was prepared to repeatedly    overlook these claims, even giving Allen the Best Screenplay    Oscar in 2012 for his film Midnight in Paris.  <\/p>\n<p>    In 2009, David Letterman was forced to admit he had indulged in    extra marital affairs with staff  including those vastly    junior to him  who worked on his CBSshow. This is not    what many would expect of a public figure of some influence,    but the liberal media didnt seem to regard it as a problem.  <\/p>\n<p>    To this list we shouldnt forget to add the New York    Times, which aggressively pushed its investigation of    OReilly and on Wednesday exulted in, as its former media    editor tweeted, claiming    his scalp. As Heat Street has     previously reported, the Timesis    facingaccusations of racial discrimination and its top    dog is dogged by shocking allegations of lying about and    covering up the sexual abuse of children.  <\/p>\n<p>    A civil law suit was launched last year against the papers    CEO, British former BBC chief Mark Thompson, by two New    York Times employees, Ernestine Grant and her colleague    Marjorie Walker. They work in itsadvertising department    and have accused their employer of engaging in    deplorable discrimination that has remained largely off the    record.  <\/p>\n<p>    Papers submitted on their behalf by New York law firm Wigdor    LLP explain: Beginning with the appointment of    Defendant Mark Thompson to Chief Executive Officer (CEO) in    2012, the workplace at the Times has become an environment rife    with discrimination based on age, race, and gender.  <\/p>\n<p>    First, they say Thompsons appointment as Times CEO    was riddled with controversy, given the numerous    humiliations and indignities he presided over during his    tumultuous tenure as the Director General of the BBC.  <\/p>\n<p>    They go on:  <\/p>\n<p>    Thompson was involved in a highly publicized BBC    scandal regarding a decision to bury an expos of child sex    abuse allegedly committed by one the BBCs most well-known    personalities, Jimmy Savile. Not only was Mr. Thompson    seemingly involved in attempting to conceal this important    piece of journalism from the public, but he also later lied    about his role in the affair, which was demonstrated through an    irrefutable recording.  <\/p>\n<p>    This recording is cited as a taped interview made in October    2012 by reporter Ben Webster of the London Times. The    recording, which Heat Street has heard, was broadcast    on UK website Guido Fawkes in March 2013 and circulated widely.  <\/p>\n<p>    The papers go on:  <\/p>\n<p>    Thompson initially denied any awareness of the    underlying allegations or of the Newsnight cancelation while    he was at the BBC. Later, however, reports indicated that he    was aware of the Newsnight investigation, well before the    cancelation. As a result, Mr. Thompson changed his story,    acknowledging that he was told about an investigation, but    maintained his lack of awareness of any details involving    sexual abuse. However, this version of events was then undone    by the surfacing of [The London Timess] audio recording in    which he admitted awareness that the investigation involved    sexual abuse of some kind.  <\/p>\n<p>    Interestingly, an interview which Thompson gave to the BBC on    September 11, 2016  three weeks after the court papers were    filed  dredged up this issue again.    Presenter Andrew Marr asked Thompson about his knowledge of the    Savile scandal. And Thompson did not deny  as has been alleged    many times, including to a committee of British MPs  that he    was told informally about the existence of    the Savile investigation in 2011 by his BBC colleague Helen    Boaden.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is what he told Marr:  <\/p>\n<p>    Thompson also discussed this issue     at greater length in 2013, as Heat Street has    noted.  <\/p>\n<p>    So what does the liberal establishment have to say about the    New York Timeschief having been involved    (allegedly) in covering up a child abuse scandal? It would be    fascinating to hear, but I wont hold my breath.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Here is the original post:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/heatst.com\/culture-wars\/the-stench-of-liberal-hypocrisy\/\" title=\"The Stench of Liberal Hypocrisy - Heat Street\">The Stench of Liberal Hypocrisy - Heat Street<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The departure of Fox News hostBill OReilly over allegations of inappropriate conduct has, predictably, caused a certain amount of exultation from liberal and left-leaning stars and commentators. Cher tweeted that OReilly and Donald Trump have sexually harassed women 4 years without providing any concrete examples to back up this claim. Rosie ODonnell followed suit, calling Trump and OReilly sexual predators of a feather.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/liberal\/the-stench-of-liberal-hypocrisy-heat-street\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187824],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-188946","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-liberal"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188946"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188946"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188946\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188946"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188946"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188946"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}