{"id":188592,"date":"2017-04-19T10:29:02","date_gmt":"2017-04-19T14:29:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/cruise-confusion-fans-weigh-in-on-royal-caribbeans-dress-code-flip-flop-fox-news\/"},"modified":"2017-04-19T10:29:02","modified_gmt":"2017-04-19T14:29:02","slug":"cruise-confusion-fans-weigh-in-on-royal-caribbeans-dress-code-flip-flop-fox-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/caribbean\/cruise-confusion-fans-weigh-in-on-royal-caribbeans-dress-code-flip-flop-fox-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Cruise confusion? Fans weigh in on Royal Caribbean&#8217;s dress code flip flop &#8211; Fox News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Royal Caribbean Internationals dress code policy for its main    dining rooms seems to be having an existential crisis.  <\/p>\n<p>    Last week, the eagle eyes atRoyalCaribbeanBlog.com, an unofficial blog    managed by fans of the cruise line, noticed that Royal    Caribbean had added shorts to its list of approved attire in    the main dining room on casual nights. Although the writer    wasnt certain when shorts had been added to the text, the blog    linked to an archived version of the Royal Caribbean website on    WayBackMachine that showed shorts were not on the official    attire list as recently as August 2016.  <\/p>\n<p>    But earlier this week, awriter for the same blog noticed    that Royal Caribbean had switched its dress code    again,dropping shorts, tanktopsand t-shirtsfrom the main    dining rooms list of casual, smart casual and formal dress    codes.  <\/p>\n<p>    Now posters on RoyalCaribbeanBlog.com are weighing in--    strongly--on both sides of the argument.  <\/p>\n<p>    A user named Dawn caught the crux of the matter in this    seemingly no-win situation for the cruise line.  <\/p>\n<p>    Nice work Royal Caribbean. Half of us hated you last week when    you allowed shorts. Now the other half hates that you changed    it back. And both sides hate each other.  <\/p>\n<p>    User Brandon weighed in firmly in favor of the policy.  <\/p>\n<p>    IMHO [in my humble opinion], dinnertime in the [Main Dining    Room] is a more formal atmosphere and calls for slacks at a    minimum. If one does not want to wear slacks, there are plenty    of other great food options on board. Having said this, Royal    does not even call it \"required attire\" it is \"suggested    attire\". We all know they don't enforce the \"code,\" but I'm    glad it exists to give people a guideline. Will my vacation be    ruined when someone walks through the MDR in shorts, a t-shirt    and flip-flops? No, but I will not be the person going to a    [Main Dining Room] dinner in shorts.  <\/p>\n<p>    But Brandon makes a salient point that truly enforcing such a    code could be a difficult endeavor, especially with a passenger    who refuses to play by the rules.  <\/p>\n<p>    Other passengers made the case for being able to wear shorts on    vacation. Adam Harmon commented:  <\/p>\n<p>    I am on the Harmony right now. I wore shorts with a nice    matching polo on our first dinner. Honestly, it felt great. I    still felt \"dressed up\" and not out of place. I understand that    people go overboard and don't respect the MDR, but to me, nice    golf shorts and a polo constitutes nice casual wear. I'm on    vacation in hot weather when I'm used to 40 degree weather back    in Indiana.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"It was great wearing shorts and not sweating through my shirt    for once. I think it turns many people away from cruises    thinking that have to dress up every night. I understand I can    go to the windjammer but it isn't the same experience or    quality of food as the [Main Dining Room.] If you want a place    that everyone dresses formal every night than pay the money and    go to a specialty restaurant.  <\/p>\n<p>    Others, like James Buswold, recommended an alternative:  <\/p>\n<p>    \"...since most of the [Main Dining Rooms] are 2-3 levels they    should have the \"formal\" people sit in the lower main since    that is where the most room is and made the upper levels more    \"casual\" or visa versa. This would have given people a choice.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    It is important to note here that neither of the    above-mentioned dress code policies were officially announced    by Royal Caribbean. Which means the policy switch could be    nothing more than the efforts of an overeager staffer who    simply cut and paste the wrong text in a web update and Royal    Caribbean later rectifying that mistake.  <\/p>\n<p>    Wed love to know, though, whats your opinion on proper attire    when dining on cruise ships?  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Excerpt from:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/travel\/2017\/04\/18\/cruise-confusion-fans-weigh-in-on-royal-caribbeans-dress-code-flip-flop.html\" title=\"Cruise confusion? Fans weigh in on Royal Caribbean's dress code flip flop - Fox News\">Cruise confusion? Fans weigh in on Royal Caribbean's dress code flip flop - Fox News<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Royal Caribbean Internationals dress code policy for its main dining rooms seems to be having an existential crisis. Last week, the eagle eyes atRoyalCaribbeanBlog.com, an unofficial blog managed by fans of the cruise line, noticed that Royal Caribbean had added shorts to its list of approved attire in the main dining room on casual nights. Although the writer wasnt certain when shorts had been added to the text, the blog linked to an archived version of the Royal Caribbean website on WayBackMachine that showed shorts were not on the official attire list as recently as August 2016 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/caribbean\/cruise-confusion-fans-weigh-in-on-royal-caribbeans-dress-code-flip-flop-fox-news\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187816],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-188592","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-caribbean"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188592"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188592"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188592\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188592"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188592"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188592"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}