{"id":188060,"date":"2017-04-15T18:03:53","date_gmt":"2017-04-15T22:03:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ufc-on-fox-24-johnson-vs-reis-odds-gambling-guide-mma-fighting\/"},"modified":"2017-04-15T18:03:53","modified_gmt":"2017-04-15T22:03:53","slug":"ufc-on-fox-24-johnson-vs-reis-odds-gambling-guide-mma-fighting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/gambling\/ufc-on-fox-24-johnson-vs-reis-odds-gambling-guide-mma-fighting\/","title":{"rendered":"UFC on FOX 24: Johnson vs. Reis odds, gambling guide &#8211; MMA Fighting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Welcome MMA bettors, speculators, and gambling lurkers! Were    back at it again for another week of comprehensive gambling    analysis from your friends at MMA Fighting. This weekends    fight card breaks a long drought of non-PPV UFC cards and its    headlined by one of the best title fights possible, so it    should be a good weekend.  <\/p>\n<p>    For those of you who are new here (or for those who have    forgotten), this aims to be an exhaustive preview of the fights    and the odds, with my own personal breakdown of where you can    find betting value. The number after the odds on each fighter    is the probability of victory that those odds imply (so Johnson    at -800 means he should win the fight 89 percent of the time).    If you think he wins more often than the odds say, you should    bet it because there's value in the line.  <\/p>\n<p>    All stats come from FightMetric and all the odds    are from Odds Shark.    Net Value means how much money you would have made if you bet    $100 on that fighter in every one of his\/her fights that odds    could be found for. As always, I'm trying to provide the most    thorough guide I can for those who want to legally bet or those    who just enjoy following along. If youre a person who chooses    to gamble, only do so legally, responsibly, and at your own    risk.  <\/p>\n<p>    Now with all that out of the way, lets do the damn    thing.  <\/p>\n<p>    Breakdown  <\/p>\n<p>    Demetrious    Johnson is attempting to tie Anderson    Silvas record for most consecutive UFC title defenses at    10, and standing in his way is veteran fighter Wilson    Reis. If Reis wins, it would be a remarkable accomplishment    for a fighter mostly viewed as a gatekeeper to the best of the    best.  <\/p>\n<p>    Johnson is one of the best fighters in the history of MMA and,    at this point, he has a credible argument for being the best    ever. In a macro sense, Johnson has no weaknesses at flyweight.    On the feet, he employs a pressuring game plan with phenomenal    footwork and elite speed and athleticism. He can work    combinations to pile up points and he has sneaky power as well;    but really, his striking serves to set up his clinch and    grappling games.  <\/p>\n<p>    Johnson is the best clinch fighter in MMA not named Jon    Jones. His ability to control opponents and attack with    knees, punches, and elbows all while constantly moving and    shifting the angle of attack is something to marvel at.    Henry    Cejudo is an Olympic gold medalist and Mighty Mouse    absolutely undressed him in the clinch in under three minutes.  <\/p>\n<p>    As good as Johnson is in the clinch, hes only slight less    accomplished as a grappler. Mighty Mouse has unrivaled talent    at reactive shots and he has a diverse array of finishes for    his take-down attempts. Once on top, he is ferocious with his    blend of control, punishment, passing, and submissions.  <\/p>\n<p>    Though the merit of Reis title shot has come under scrutiny    (Reis has one win over a ranked opponent and he essentially got    this title shot because Johnson has beaten everyone else), that    should in no way undermine the talent the Brazilian brings to    the table. Reis is a capable fighter with skills in every phase    of the game. On the feet, hes a powerful southpaw with solid    defense who works in combinations. He also has an underrated    kicking game and footwork. That being said, Reis comes from a    BJJ background and that remains the linchpin of his offense.  <\/p>\n<p>    Reis is an excellent wrestler with clean entries and    authoritative finishes. Hes also a dogged wrestler, willing to    shoot frequently and continue working until he finishes the    takedown. On top he has exceptional control and passing. He    looks to punish opponents with big power strikes, opening up    opportunities for submissions.  <\/p>\n<p>    Johnsons struggles have come when hes been physically    outmatched by bigger men, a la Tim    Elliott and Dominick    Cruz. That aint Reis. The weakest part of Johnsons game    is his defensive wrestling, and Reis has the offensive chops    there to make him work for it some, but realistically, Reis is    just outmatched here. Aside from all the glowing praised heaped    upon Mighty Mouse, he also happens to have most of the    intangible advantages here; his mental toughness and will are    off the charts and he may well have the best fight IQ in the    history of the sport. I struggle to see Reis having even more    than a modicum of success here. The pick is Johnson by    fourth-round TKO and honestly, hes mathematically a fine bet    here. Im not suggesting you bet the house on him by any means,    but Johnson wins this fight 95 times out of 100. Given the    width of the line though, maybe just add him in a small parlay    bet to boost the value a smidge.  <\/p>\n<p>    Breakdown  <\/p>\n<p>    The next strawweight title shot is likely on the line when    former title challenger Rose    Namajunas takes on former Invicta atomweight champion    Michelle    Waterson.  <\/p>\n<p>    Waterson is a striker by trade  as the \"Karate Hottie\" moniker    would infer  but shes also a more than serviceable grappler.    On the feet, Waterson has a good understanding of range and    angles to go along with her diverse striking game. She fights    long, using a variety of kicks and a steady jab to maintain    distance, which also makes her difficult to hit.  <\/p>\n<p>    On the mat, Waterson is a very solid grappler with extremely    underrated wrestling and a controlling top game guided by good    positional awareness. Watersons biggest weakness is her size.    A former atomweight, Waterson is definitely small for the    division, though her plus athleticism helps to close this gap    against most fighters.  <\/p>\n<p>    At only 24, Thug Rose is still developing as a fighter    despite being one of the best 115 pounders in the world.    Namajunas has transformed herself from a kamikaze action    grappler into a more measured out fighter. She has good pop in    her hands and has developed a nice jab and good straight right    to throw off of it. She also has an array of kicks to keep    range or attack with. Still though, Namajunas does her best    work as a grappler where she is a phenomenal scrambler with    excellent striking from top and a good passing game. Namajunas    biggest issues appear to be mental, as she has a tendency to    get overwhelmed by a relentless offensive attack, getting stuck    on the receiving end instead of changing the terms of    engagement.  <\/p>\n<p>    The UFCs new ownership very clearly would prefer a Waterson    victory here (WME-IMG now represent her) and I think they will    actually get their wish. On the feet, I favor Namajunas size,    but Watersons craft will keep her competitive and her    pressuring style will bring her into the ranges at which she    will be most effective.     Karolina Kowalkiewicz ran roughshod over Namajunas in the    clinch, and though Waterson isnt as good there, I still think    she can win those exchanges. Moreover, Namajunas is a better    defensive wrestler, but Waterson is actually an extremely    crafty takedown artist. I think she can ground Namajunas and    control from top position without getting swept or submitted.    The pick is Waterson in a really fun fight and I like her for a    bet at plus money.  <\/p>\n<p>    Breakdown  <\/p>\n<p>    Ronaldo    Souza is arguably the best middleweight on the planet right    now, but with Michael    Bisping tying up the 185-pound belt fighting guys outside    of the top of the division, hes left to take fights like these    against underrated, highly-ranked middleweights. Conversely,    Robert    Whittaker is the dark horse of the middleweight division    and a win here would be the biggest one of his career and earn    him a title eliminator bout next.  <\/p>\n<p>    Jacare is a probably the best grappler to ever crossover into    MMA (though Demian    Maia may argue the point). Hes a multiple time BJJ world    champion and the strongest part of his game remains his    takedowns, top control, and submissions. Souza is still an    elite athlete despite his advancing age, able to cover distance    quickly and finish takedowns with authority. Hes not a one    dimensional fighter though. On the feet, Jacare pressures    behind good footwork and he has power in his strikes.  <\/p>\n<p>    Whittaker is predominantly a counterstriker. Though hes small    for the division, Whittaker uses this to his advantage, darting    around with light feet and quick hands. He maintains distance    well, works at an excellent pace, and he has surprising power    in his hands when he commits to it. Also, as the numbers    indicate, Whittaker is nearly impossible to takedown, with    excellent defensive wrestling backed up by his mobility and    footwork.  <\/p>\n<p>    Bobby Knuckles is about to do the UFC a favor and clean up    some of the backlog of contenders awaiting Michael Bisping    should he ever choose to actually face one because this fight    is just a bad matchup for Souza. Jacares pressuring style    plays right into the very effective stick and move countering    game plan of Whittaker and Whittakers elite takedown defense    mean Souza will be stuck on the feet with him. The volume,    speed, and movement of Whittaker will be too much for Jacare    (who I think is fading physically) and Whittaker will pile up    points in route to landing a late knockout blow. Whittaker by    KO in the third round and I love him for a bet.  <\/p>\n<p>    Breakdown  <\/p>\n<p>    Jeremy    Stephens is looking to get back on track in the    featherweight division after coming up short against Frankie    Edgar in his last outing. He faces the up-and-coming    Renato    Moicano, who is looking to announce himself as a real    threat in one of the UFCs hottest divisions.  <\/p>\n<p>    Stephens is a power puncher, pure and simple. Over the years he    has evolved from a hard-hitting brawler into a more refined    fighter, but the general gist of his game remains the same:    land big shots until the opponent drops. He accomplishes this    by using sharp footwork and a pressuring style dictated by a    thudding jab. Stephens biggest weakness are his low volume on    the feet and his mediocre wrestling and grappling skills.  <\/p>\n<p>    Moicano is a big, athletic featherweight with an aggressive    style who pushes a high pace behind a pressuring counter game.    Hes a good clinch fighter and offensive wrestler and once on    top, hes dangerous striker and pass-and-sub guy. Moicanos    biggest weakness is his aggression and defense, which can get    him hit a fair bit.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is a pretty close fight. Moicano looks like he might be a    real talent in the division and his pressuring style and volume    can win him rounds against Stephens, but also create openings    for Stephens to counter him with power punches. Ultimately,    this might be a little too much too soon for Moicano, but his    potential for growth and his avenues to succeed make me lean    towards him slightly. The pick is Moicano by decision and I    like him for a bet.  <\/p>\n<p>        Alexander Volkov (-150\/60%) vs.    Roy    Nelson (+130\/43%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Volkov is a tall heavyweight at 6 7 and he uses that height    to stick on the outside with kicks and long punches. Hes also    got pretty good footwork for the heavyweight division and is a    solid defender of takedowns. Nelson is a longtime UFC veteran    who, at this point, is almost nothing beyond an enormous    overhand right and a historically brilliant chin. Nelson also    is a respected BJJ black belt, but those skills have been    almost forgotten by him in favor of huge KOs.  <\/p>\n<p>    I dont think Nelson can effectively take Volkov down, and,    more to the point, Im not even sure he will try to. That means    the arithmetic in this fight boils down to: does Nelson land    the big right hand? Because if he doesnt, Volkov almost    certainly wins on volume. Volkovs head is pretty hittable but    hes proven himself fairly durable and his outside game    eight-inch reach advantage (plus seven-inch height advantage)    make it more likely that Nelson comes up empty here. The pick    is Volkov by decision, and at these odds he might be worth a    bet or a parlay inclusion.  <\/p>\n<p>        Patrick Williams (+550\/15%) vs.        Tom Duquesnoy (-800\/89%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Williams is a good athlete with solid wrestling and decent top    control, but hes facing the best pure prospect in all of MMA.    Duquesnoy is an elite level athlete and an aggressive striker    with a diverse set of weapons and a preternatural sense of    timing and distance. On the floor, things get no easier, as    Duquesnoy is a strong wrestler with great scrambling ability.  <\/p>\n<p>    Duquesnoy is already a top-15 bantamweight and hes fighting a    guy who hasnt competed in almost two years. Williams    wrestling maybe keeps him afloat for a while, but hes bring a    knife to a gun fight here. Duquesnoy knocks him out in under    eight minutes. That being said, no one should ever in their    life bet on a young kid making his UFC debut at damn near -800    odds.  <\/p>\n<p>    Bobby    Green (+300\/25%) vs.     Rashid Magomedov (-360\/78%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Green is a striking technician with good defense and solid    wrestling, both offensive and defensively. His biggest problem    comes from inconsistency and a tendency to showboat without    backing it up with offense. Magomedov is a technical    counterstriker who builds momentum as the fight goes on. He has    fantastic defensive wrestling and will occasionally mix things    up with surprisingly effective takedowns.  <\/p>\n<p>    I doubt either man will be able to wrestle effectively here,    and in a striking battle, Magomedov is a touch more technical.    Greens inconsistency and lack of cage time recently also aids    the Dagestani. Magomedov wins a lackluster decision, but the    odds are far too long here and a bet on Green is justifiable    from a value perspective, though I dont personally feel    confident entrusting my betting money on him.  <\/p>\n<p>    Louis    Smolka (+220\/31%) vs. Tim Elliott    (-260\/72%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Smolka is a rangy flyweight who prefers to stick on the outside    and kick opponents or engage in scramble-based grappling    affairs. Elliott is a good sized flyweight with a funky,    scramble based game on the mat and a pressuring style on the    feet.  <\/p>\n<p>    This fight should be ridiculously fun, but Elliott appears to    have all the edges. Hes throws close to the same volume as    Smolka on the feet but hes a better defensive fighter, and on    the mat, Elliott should be the better scrambler to go along    with having a superior offensive wrestling game. Elliott    controls the tempo and exchanges, winning a fun decision. At    these odds, theres a credible bet on Smolka here, but    ultimately, I would pass.  <\/p>\n<p>        Aljamain Sterling (-400\/80%) vs.        Augusto Mendes (+330\/23%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Sterling is one of the brighter prospects at 135 pounds who has    had a rough go of it lately. Hes a former two-time NCAA D-III    All-American who is best served as a grappler, but is using his    striking more and more, lately to his detriment. Mendes is a    former world champion BJJ black belt with solid, consistent    takedowns to back up his elite ground game.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is a really dangerous fight for Sterling. Sterling got    out-grappled by Bryan    Caraway, so Mendes could really put to the wood to him    there, and Sterlings stand-up is still so nascent, its not    clear he will have a huge advantage there despite Mendes own    striking deficiencies. Still, Sterlings six-inch reach    advantage plus his tendency to kick from range probably lets    him eke out at least two rounds to win a tedious decision. That    being said, the odds here are wildly out of whack and I highly    recommend a bet on Mendes for value.  <\/p>\n<p>    Devin    Clark (-150\/60%) vs. Jake    Collier (+130\/43%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Clark is a former Juco national champion wrestler. Hes a    phenomenal athlete with good timing on his takedowns and clean,    powerful finishes. Collier was a big middleweight and now hes    jumping up to 205. He uses his size and high-output kickboxing    game to win blood-and-guts fights because hes not a defensive    minded fighter.  <\/p>\n<p>    Collier can wrestle and scramble well enough to make this    interesting, but in the end, Clark is just a far superior    athlete. Clark wins a back-and-forth decision, but if youre    gonna bet on this one, Collier has the value. Id pass though    since there is plenty of other action elsewhere on this card.  <\/p>\n<p>        Anthony Smith (+270\/27%)    vs.     Andrew Sanchez (-330\/77%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Smith is a big middleweight and hell have a sizable size and    reach advantage here. Hes a striker by trade but he has    terrible takedown defense, and though hes active off his back,    hes not super threatening. Sanchez isnt shy about engaging in    a striking battle and hes a pretty good counterpuncher. He    also has a solid wrestling game to fall back on.  <\/p>\n<p>    Smith is the bigger man but Sanchez has more tools. I expect    hell be competitive on the feet and able to take Smith down    with relative ease. Sanchez wins an easy decision, but these    odds are far too long to put money down on it.  <\/p>\n<p>    Zak    Cummings (-450\/82%)    vs. Nathan    Coy (+375\/21%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Coy is a former NCAA D-1 All-American wrestler with a    pressuring, grinding style. Hes a serviceable striker as well    with an active jab. Cummings also has a wrestling background    but on the JUCO level. He likes to pressure forward and hes an    adept counterpuncher with big power in his hands.  <\/p>\n<p>    Cummings has a six-inch reach advantage here as well as being    the better, more powerful striker, and probably the better    submission grappler as well. Cummings defensive wrestling has    also proved stalwart and I expect Coy will get stuck on the    feet with Cummings, who will eventually land the knockout blow    midway through the fight. Again, though, dont put your money    on lower tier fights with odds this long.  <\/p>\n<p>        Ashlee Evans-Smith (-190\/66%) vs.        Ketlen Vieira (+170\/37%)  <\/p>\n<p>    Evans-Smith is a big bantamweight with a wrestling background.    Shes a decent top control artist but mostly she prefers a high    volume kickboxing attack on the feet. Vieira is also a big    bantamweight, but she has a judo background and does her best    work controlling on the mat. Shes a willing striker but shes    defensively porous.  <\/p>\n<p>    Evans-Smith relies a lot on her size and athleticism and Vieira    can compete there, but her tendency to get hit often is a big    problem. Evans-Smith takes a decision, but pass on a bet here.  <\/p>\n<p>    Suggested bets.  <\/p>\n<p>    Fine bets but not suggested.  <\/p>\n<p>    Thats all folks. We had a good week last week, ending up +210    total on our suggested bets and +215 on our possible bets.    Hopefully well keep that momentum going this week.  <\/p>\n<p>    I hope everyone enjoys the fights this weekend (especially    those adventurous souls who intend to stay up for RIZIN). Good    luck to those who need it, and if you've got any questions,    feel free to hit me up on Twitter @JedKMeshew.  <\/p>\n<p>    (Editor's note: All of this advice is for    entertainment purposes only.)  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>The rest is here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.mmafighting.com\/2017\/4\/15\/15299282\/ufc-on-fox-johnson-vs-reis-odds-gambling-guide-ufc-on-fox-24-demetrious-johnson-wilson-reis\" title=\"UFC on FOX 24: Johnson vs. Reis odds, gambling guide - MMA Fighting\">UFC on FOX 24: Johnson vs. Reis odds, gambling guide - MMA Fighting<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Welcome MMA bettors, speculators, and gambling lurkers! Were back at it again for another week of comprehensive gambling analysis from your friends at MMA Fighting. This weekends fight card breaks a long drought of non-PPV UFC cards and its headlined by one of the best title fights possible, so it should be a good weekend. For those of you who are new here (or for those who have forgotten), this aims to be an exhaustive preview of the fights and the odds, with my own personal breakdown of where you can find betting value <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/gambling\/ufc-on-fox-24-johnson-vs-reis-odds-gambling-guide-mma-fighting\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187831],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-188060","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gambling"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188060"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188060"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188060\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188060"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188060"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188060"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}