{"id":187971,"date":"2017-04-15T17:36:59","date_gmt":"2017-04-15T21:36:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/artificial-intelligence-the-single-biggest-threat-to-apple-inc-nasdaq-aapl-wealth-daily\/"},"modified":"2017-04-15T17:36:59","modified_gmt":"2017-04-15T21:36:59","slug":"artificial-intelligence-the-single-biggest-threat-to-apple-inc-nasdaq-aapl-wealth-daily","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/artificial-intelligence\/artificial-intelligence-the-single-biggest-threat-to-apple-inc-nasdaq-aapl-wealth-daily\/","title":{"rendered":"Artificial Intelligence: The Single Biggest Threat to Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) &#8211; Wealth Daily"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    For over a decade now, the biggest selling points of premium    smartphones have been all about physical design.  <\/p>\n<p>    But in the coming years, the consumer electronics market is    poised to experience a radical shift  one that every investor    should start paying attention to today.  <\/p>\n<p>    When Steve Jobs officially unveiled the first iPhone to the    world in 2007, there was enormous hype surrounding its    groundbreaking touch interface  and for good reason. By    blending input and display into a single place, Apple managed    to redefine the mobile device entirely.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the years that followed, Apple introduced a great number of    incremental improvements, and it was always the physical    redesigns that stood out and that have spurred sales the most.  <\/p>\n<p>    The iPhone 4 (2010) was the first major redesign for Apple. It    had a sleek, modern look, and it was the first iPhone to    feature a high-pixel count Retina display. It also introduced    the world to the front-facing camera, which has become a staple    of todays premium smartphones.  <\/p>\n<p>    The following year, Apple managed to nearly double its iPhone    to 93 million units.  <\/p>\n<p>    The changes to the iPhone 5 (2012) were less radical, but there    were meaningful physical improvements nonetheless. The phone    featured an extra-tall screen, which allowed for a bottom row    of applications. It also introduced Apples Lightning    connector, which could be easily inserted face up or face down.  <\/p>\n<p>    Not long after, the iPhone 5S (2013) was introduced with Touch    ID, enabled by a bold new fingerprint sensor.  <\/p>\n<p>    And thenthere was the iPhone 6 (2014), Apples latest    major redesign. This model introduced NFC for Apple Pay and    extended its screen size by reducing the bezel footprint.  <\/p>\n<p>    But in 2015 something weird happened...  <\/p>\n<p>    That year, Apple released the iPhone 6S, and it was visually    identical to its predecessor. If you held the two in your hand,    youd have a difficult time telling the difference.  <\/p>\n<p>    Then in 2016, it was more of the same: The iPhone7 was nearly    identical from a design standpoint. The only notable addition    was actually the removal of its headphone jack.  <\/p>\n<p>    For acute investors, this three-year lull in physical redesign    exposed a notable chink in Apples armor: the company, which    was once adding new and meaningful physical features to its    phones as often as once a year, had begun to run out of ideas.  <\/p>\n<p>    That is, Apple was running into a very unusual problem most    companies never face: design perfection.  <\/p>\n<p>    When it comes to physical design, theres really not much to    argue about: Apple has a reputation for being the best in the    business.  <\/p>\n<p>    But as the years have gone by, Apples design improvements have    drastically reduced in significance.  <\/p>\n<p>    And as a byproduct, its competitors have caught up. In certain    cases, they have even surpassed Apple in terms of quality of    design.  <\/p>\n<p>    Samsungs flagship Galaxy S line, for one, has had wireless    charging for years. Apple may or may not feature wireless    charging in the iPhone 8.  <\/p>\n<p>    Googles new flagship Pixel phone is another example. Its    camera is arguably the best available on the market.  <\/p>\n<p>    Of course, Apple is by no means lagging far behind its    competitors, but the reality is that other manufacturers have    reached design parity. Unless Apple has some radical new design    up its sleeve, the company will continue to offer little more    than a brand name above its competition.  <\/p>\n<p>    What this likely means for Apple is further reduction in market    share because consumers now have equivalent options. This is    just a simple law of economics, and its why Googles Android    OS snagged a record market share with nearly nine in every 10        smartphones late last year.  <\/p>\n<p>    Its also why on Wednesday, TrendForce revealed that Samsung    has already regained its top market share position following    last years exploding Galaxy Note fiasco. The firm owned 26.1%    of the smartphone market worldwide in the first quarter, versus    Apples 16.9%.  <\/p>\n<p>    Thats a stark contrast to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016,    where Apple stood at 20.3% market share and Samsung at 18.5%.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is as much proof as you need that Apple has lost any true    technological edge.  <\/p>\n<p>    And it could be getting a whole lot worse for the major handset    maker in the years to come.  <\/p>\n<p>      The Best Free Investment You'll Ever Make    <\/p>\n<p>        Stay on top of the hottest investment ideas before        they hit Wall Street. Sign up for the Wealth Daily        newsletter below. You'll also get our free three part        report, \"Five Tech Stocks to Buy        Now\".      <\/p>\n<p>    The only thing more troubling for Apple than product parity is    product obsolescence.  <\/p>\n<p>    In terms of design, Apple is at minimal threat from competing    handset OEMs. With the smartphone near design perfection,    theres little left to differentiate any single premium from    the other.  <\/p>\n<p>    But where Apple faces serious competition within the smartphone    market is at the level of software and ecosystems.  <\/p>\n<p>    Specifically, Apple is coming in at a heavy disadvantage when    it comes to artificially intelligent digital assistants.  <\/p>\n<p>    While its true that Apple was the first to introduce a digital    assistant with Siri, its ability to leverage AI to its    advantage has been negligible compared to the competition. Both    Google and Amazon have begun making significant strides with    Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant over the last year.  <\/p>\n<p>    Google Assistant is a particular threat to Apple for two    reasons...  <\/p>\n<p>    First, Android penetrates close to 90% of the global smartphone    market. This means Google can show Apple up with a single    software update the moment it develops a fully conversational    AI. And make no mistake, this is Googles objective.  <\/p>\n<p>    Second, and this is also tied to Android market share, Google    has access to significantly more consumer data than Apple  and    its able to parse it all out. This is whats referred to in    the industry as a knowledge base, or as Google calls it, a    Knowledge Graph.  <\/p>\n<p>    According to various sources, Googles Knowledge Graph contains    18 billion statements about 570 million entities, with a schema    of 1,500 entity types and 35,000 relation types.  <\/p>\n<p>    All told, the knowledge base is armed with 70 billion facts.    This means you can ask Google Assistant a question, and instead    of directing you to a website, it can answer you directly in 70    billion different scenarios.  <\/p>\n<p>    For years, Google has been learning about us. It knows what    questions we ask and the answers were looking for. Its been    collecting a vast web of knowledge. This unprecedented    knowledge base is the heart of the companys long-term strategy    for absolute technological dominance.  <\/p>\n<p>    Apple, on the other hand, can only dominate on the hardware    front, and will face an enormous challenge breaking out of its    vertical ecosystem. Apples isolation, which once served the    company quite well, has suddenly become a major detriment.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ben Rickard, head of mobile at MEC global solutions and EMEA,    puts it this way:  <\/p>\n<p>      What is becoming increasingly clear is that visual and      branding identity will become less relevant in a world that      is operated by voice and Natural Language Processing      (NLP).    <\/p>\n<p>    In other words, were going to soon stop looking at our phones    and start talking to them instead as digital assistants become    more conversational. Eventually, the form factor of mobile    devices as we know them today will start to fade away.  <\/p>\n<p>    Gartner, for one, projects that by 2018, 30% of our everyday    contact with technology will be conversational.  <\/p>\n<p>    And ComScore estimates that 50% of all web searches will be    through conversation by 2020.  <\/p>\n<p>    Thats great news for software- and AI-focused companies like    Google. Its terrible news for hardware-focused companies like    Apple, Inc.  <\/p>\n<p>    But more than any other business niche, its a winning formula    for the makers of embedded microphones. No matter what the form    factor of our future     AI assistant, theyre always going to need a way to listen.  <\/p>\n<p>    Until next time,  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Jason Stutman  <\/p>\n<p>    @JasonStutman on Twitter  <\/p>\n<p>    Jason Stutman is Wealth Daily's senior technology    analyst and editor of investment advisory newsletters    Technology and Opportunity and The Cutting Edge. His strategy    for building winning portfolios is simple: Buy the disruptor,    sell the disrupted.  <\/p>\n<p>    Covering the broad sector of technology and    occasionally dabbling in the political sphere, Jason has    written hundreds of articles spanning topics from consumer    electronics and development stage biotechnology to political    forecasting and social commentary.<\/p>\n<p>    Outside the office Jason is a lover of science    fiction and the outdoors, and an amateur squash player at best.    He writes through the lens of a futurist, free market advocate,    and fiscal conservative. Jason currently hails from Baltimore,    Maryland, with roots in the great state of New    York.<\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more from the original source: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.wealthdaily.com\/articles\/artificial-intelligence-the-single-biggest-threat-to-apple-inc-nasdaq-aapl\/8623\" title=\"Artificial Intelligence: The Single Biggest Threat to Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) - Wealth Daily\">Artificial Intelligence: The Single Biggest Threat to Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) - Wealth Daily<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> For over a decade now, the biggest selling points of premium smartphones have been all about physical design.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/artificial-intelligence\/artificial-intelligence-the-single-biggest-threat-to-apple-inc-nasdaq-aapl-wealth-daily\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187742],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187971","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-artificial-intelligence"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187971"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187971"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187971\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187971"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187971"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187971"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}