{"id":187637,"date":"2017-04-13T23:41:39","date_gmt":"2017-04-14T03:41:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/how-defense-of-marriage-became-freedom-to-marry-uc-berkeley\/"},"modified":"2017-04-13T23:41:39","modified_gmt":"2017-04-14T03:41:39","slug":"how-defense-of-marriage-became-freedom-to-marry-uc-berkeley","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom\/how-defense-of-marriage-became-freedom-to-marry-uc-berkeley\/","title":{"rendered":"How &#8216;Defense of Marriage&#8217; became &#8216;Freedom to Marry&#8217; &#8211; UC Berkeley"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      Freedom to Marry founder Evan Wolfson with the plaintiffs in      Baehr v. Miike (Hawaii, 1996), the first same-sex marriage      case brought to trial. Photo courtesy of Marilyn Humphries.    <\/p>\n<p>    In 1996, the year Congress passed the federal Defense of    Marriage Act  which denied legally married same-sex couples    the same protections and responsibilities afforded to    different-sex couples  Gallup asked Americans:Do you    think marriages between same-sex couples should or should not    be recognized as valid, with the same rights as traditional    marriages?  <\/p>\n<p>    Sixty-eight percent of those polled responded negatively, 37    percent responded positively and 5 percent had no opinion.  <\/p>\n<p>    Twenty years, a landmark Supreme Court ruling and 37 states    affirming the freedom to marry for same-sex couples later,    Gallup found that the numbers had essentially flipped: 61    percent in the affirmative, 37 percent negative, 2 percent    without an opinion.  <\/p>\n<p>    Key to that vast cultural and legal shift was Freedom to Marry,    the national coalition that pushed for marriage equality on all    fronts. The stories of more than 20 people in and around    Freedom to Marry are the subjects of the latest project from    the Oral History Center at UC Berkeleys Bancroft Library.    The oral histories document both the reversal in public    opinion about marriage and the actions of the individuals and    organizations that stoked those changes.  <\/p>\n<p>    Details and nuances captured in the roughly 100 hours of    recordings archived at the OHC are intended to keep the depth    and color of the Freedom to Marry movement from fading over    time.  <\/p>\n<p>    What we got out of these interviews, says Oral History Center    director Martin Meeker, is an amazing amount of detail that is    really fine-grained. We have access to details of the campaigns    and the internal debates that will slip away over time because    people just wont remember them.  <\/p>\n<p>    Interviewers from the OHC worked extensively with key figures    in the Freedom to Marry movement, including movement founder    Evan Wolfson; Kate Kendell, executive director of the National    Center for Lesbian Rights; James Esseks, director of the ACLUs    LGBT and HIV project; and Thalia Zepatos, Freedom to Marrys    message guru.  <\/p>\n<p>    Wolfson, who was interviewed for more than 10 hours, is a    significant figure in the movement and is of particular    interest for the OHCs project. Wolfson has been a leading    thinker and strategist around the same-sex marriage cause. As a    law student at Harvard in the 1980s, Wolfson produced a thesis    advocating for same-sex marriage  a cause position that was    not popular in the LGBT community at the time.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the 70s and early 80s, there were very few people, maybe    only a handful, that were advocating extending marriage to    same-sex couples  including gay people, explains Meeker.    Most gay people at the time were more in line with abolishing    marriage rather than extending it. Marriage was viewed as a    tool of the patriarchy, yet here was this young law school    student producing a smart and interesting argument why same-sex    marriage shouldnt just be on the agenda of the gay movement,    but at the top of it.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Freedom to Marry project chronicles the evolution of that    idea and the many successes and setbacks along the way,    including numerous legal and legislative challenges to same-sex    marriage. Legal cases like the first-ever trial over same-sex    marriage (HawaiisBaehr v. Lewin) and    theU.S.Supreme Courts 2015    decision inObergefell v.    Hodgesare put under a microscope by the    people who worked closely on the cases. Legislative action and    political maneuvering, such as the passage of Californias    anti-same-sex-marriage Proposition 8 in 2008 and the role of    congressional Republicans and the Tea Party movement of 2010,    are also told in tremendous detail.  <\/p>\n<p>    What an oral history project does, says Meeker, is it allows    key individuals to speak in their own words about the work they    did and reflect on the significance of that work. A lot of the    interviews go into some of the more difficult or more personal    moments of success or failure. These are things that arent    spoken about publicly, but theyre a part of the history. Were    documenting things that almost certainly wouldnt have been    seen or heard otherwise.  <\/p>\n<p>    The OHCs Freedom to Marry project is available now on the    Bancroft Libraryswebsite,    as areMeekers    thoughtson how lessons of Freedom to Marry can be    applied to similar movements arising in response to the    election of President Trump.  <\/p>\n<p>    Additionally, Meeker and the OHC will host a brown-bag    lunchtime presentation on how narrative can be employed as a    strategy for social change in Room 267 of the Bancroft Library    on Monday, April 17.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Continued here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/news.berkeley.edu\/2017\/04\/13\/how-defense-of-marriage-became-freedom-to-marry\/\" title=\"How 'Defense of Marriage' became 'Freedom to Marry' - UC Berkeley\">How 'Defense of Marriage' became 'Freedom to Marry' - UC Berkeley<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Freedom to Marry founder Evan Wolfson with the plaintiffs in Baehr v.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom\/how-defense-of-marriage-became-freedom-to-marry-uc-berkeley\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187727],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187637","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-freedom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187637"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187637"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187637\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187637"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187637"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187637"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}