Illustration: Maya Robinson\/Vulture <\/p>\n
Back in the early years of the new millennium, Scarlett Johansson seemed to have a lane: She starred with Thora Birch in Terry Zwigoff and Daniel Clowess teen-angst classic Ghost World, with Bill Murray in Sofia Coppolas ennui-soaked classic Lost in Translation, and in the ensemble cast of Paul Weitzs In Good Company. She was a character actor whose existential angst seemed to be in constant combat with the way men saw her, a lead who never overshadowed or overwhelmed the film. And she did not appear to be the kind of actor who would, ten years later, be playing a killer cyborg, right on the heels of playing a drug mule turned superhuman, right on the heels of playing a killer alien. <\/p>\n
Johansson has had one of the stranger career shifts of any major female actor in recent memory. Shes gone from indie darling to mainstream action star, and in relatively little time; at just 32, shes already had more phases than some performers double her age. But if you go through her filmography, the transition actually begins to make sense and if you subtly shift the focus of how were considering her, you discover that it isnt that unusual at all. <\/p>\n
After debuting, at the age of 9, in North, Johansson steadily picked up steam until she blew up in her late teens, becoming a go-to ingnue for directors like Robert Redford, the Coen brothers, Coppola, Brian De Palma, Christopher Nolan, and Woody Allen, who cast her three times between 2005 and 2008. In the bulk of these films (excepting Redfords The Horse Whisperer), Johansson plays an attractive young woman who motivates the male lead in some way, and though her performances received plenty of critical praise, they tended to blur together in retrospect. Of all her work from this period, Lost in Translation truly stands out not coincidentally, the product of a female director as does Match Point, the peak example of the type of role she was being given in those days. <\/p>\n
Aside from the period pieces that most young female actors find themselves in at some point in their early careers, Johanssons first major step in a different direction came with Michael Bays sci-fi flop The Island in 2005. Along with Nolans The Prestige in 2006, The Island indicated a glossier direction, away from the more human intrigues of the films that shed been known for up to that point. That period also coincided with her Allen collaborations, and the contrast between the two worlds, though not uncommon for a marketable actor, indicated that Johansson hadnt yet quite settled on the direction she would go in. However, they did suggest that she had an interest in physicality and spectacle that hadnt been shown before. <\/p>\n
The shift began in earnest in 2008, when Johansson starred in the now-forgotten Frank Miller adaptation The Spirit, an attempt to capitalize on the success of Sin City. While that movie turned out to be a disaster, it functioned as a sort of dry run for the role that would change her career: Natasha Romanoff, the Black Widow, whom she first played in 2010s Iron Man 2. The part was Johanssons decisive leap into the blockbuster world: Unlike other tentpole action films, the Marvel movies tend to transform their actors, due both to the number of times they reprise those roles and the enormous visibility of the films. But the strangest thing about Johanssons experience is that the roles that came next would offer an indirect commentary on those that came before.<\/p>\n
Since Iron Man 2, Johansson has played the Black Widow in four more movies. And aside from Marvel, shes made ten other films. Only two of these, Don Jon and Chef, feel like roles that she wouldve played before Iron Man 2. Two more Hitchcock and Hail, Caesar! saw her appear only briefly, and another two were voice roles. Excluding Ghost in the Shell, which just had a ghastly opening weekend, the trio of films that remain makes up her most successful work to date, and the most effective exploration of Johanssons singularity as an actor: Under the Skin, Her, and Lucy. <\/p>\n
All three of these movies are very different, but they have a shared gene that makes Johansson feel so natural in them. Jonathan Glazers Under the Skin is an enigmatic exploration of identity and human desire, with Johansson playing an alien who seduces, kidnaps, and then kills men. In Spike Jonzes Her, Johansson never actually appears onscreen, voicing the operating system that Joaquin Phoenixs Theodore Twombly falls in love with. And in Lucy, Johansson turns the typical story of an American woman abroad who runs afoul of a criminal element into a strange riff on the action hero, in which Johanssons character essentially becomes God. <\/p>\n
In none of these films does Johansson play a regular person. Instead, with a savvy awareness of her own distinct physicality, Johansson and her directors riff on the nature of personhood, taking advantage of her power as a screen presence to isolate certain elements and call attention to their removal. In Under the Skin, its humanity; in Her, its the body; and in Lucy, its the limitations of natural law. These films explore and subvert the concept of what a woman on film can be, and especially how a beautiful woman appears to a male viewer; in that sense, they can almost be read as a direct response not a refutation, necessarily, but a reaction to or progression from the work of her earlier career. And it doesnt seem like a coincidence that, while Johanssons more conventional performances in Don Jon and Chef were well-received, neither came to define her career like these other films did. <\/p>\n
With these films, Johansson has become our leading avatar for characters exploring the line between human and nonhuman. Although far less effective than Under the Skin, Her, and Lucy, Ghost in the Shell is no different, placing Johansson in the place of a robot with a human mind a metaphor for an actor inhabiting a role. While the evolution of her career appears to be unique in comparison to most other major female actors the closest analogues might be Angelina Jolie and Keira Knightley, who also successfully turned themselves from ingnues into action heroines it actually feels quite common when you consider her next to men, who often make this kind of transition. (See: Jake Gyllenhaal, Michael Fassbender, Ryan Gosling.) <\/p>\n
Of course, most men arent given the same imperative to explore the way the world interacts with their bodies and selves nor do they tend to do it with the kind of ingenuity and experimentalism that Johansson has. And with her next film, Rough Night, being a comedy, we could soon get a reminder that there isnt any one lane Johansson wants to work in. If her characters tend to explore the edges of what it means to be human, than she seems interested in exploring the edges of what it means to be a movie star. <\/p>\n
Taran Killam Says Trumps SNL Appearance Was Not Fun and That He Struggled at the Table Read<\/p>\n
Jimmy Kimmel Remembers Don Rickles Through Jokes, Tears, and an Angry Frank Sinatra Anecdote<\/p>\n
What I loved most about working with this editorial legend.<\/p>\n
No one was safe from Rickles, and thats what made him so essential.<\/p>\n
Praise.<\/p>\n
The album is short but it feels rich and lived-in.<\/p>\n
Sean Penn says his one-time collaborator Steve Bannon is a conniving hateful bloated punk who despises mankind.<\/p>\n
To quote a line from a linear series later rebooted as a streaming show, Theres always money in the banana stand.<\/p>\n
This is music tailor-made for being sad about the recent past.<\/p>\n
This isnt the first time hes made headlines.<\/p>\n
In a literal sense.<\/p>\n
Guillaume Laurant, the films screenwriter, and Craig Lucas, who wrote the book for the musical, discuss the enduring story.<\/p>\n
The writer of the Netflix series Love on the fanny pack, Swedish cola candies, and hand soap she stocks up on.<\/p>\n
I made sure that I had carbs with everything and French fries with everything.<\/p>\n
A network of nice men form the fabric of Romanian director Cristian Mungius irony-fueled tragedy.<\/p>\n
Danger Mouse and Sam Cohens Resistance Radio soundtracks an alternate America.<\/p>\n
With the new changes, the doc would not have been eligible.<\/p>\n
Theres a dangerous period around your late 30s, early 40s, where on a good day you look 36 and on a bad day you look 49.<\/p>\n
Shes multifaceted, engrossing, and willing to get weird.<\/p>\n
In honor of Going in Style, Vulture assembled the ideal cast of old guys to get their mojo back.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read more: Illustration: Maya Robinson\/Vulture Back in the early years of the new millennium, Scarlett Johansson seemed to have a lane: She starred with Thora Birch in Terry Zwigoff and Daniel Clowess teen-angst classic Ghost World, with Bill Murray in Sofia Coppolas ennui-soaked classic Lost in Translation, and in the ensemble cast of Paul Weitzs In Good Company. She was a character actor whose existential angst seemed to be in constant combat with the way men saw her, a lead who never overshadowed or overwhelmed the film. Continue reading
\nHow Scarlett Johansson Became Our Finest Post-Human Movie Star - Vulture<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"