{"id":186225,"date":"2017-04-03T20:25:19","date_gmt":"2017-04-04T00:25:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/on-teaching-evolution-objectively-alabama-is-right-in-step-with-the-vast-majority-of-americans-discovery-institute\/"},"modified":"2017-04-03T20:25:19","modified_gmt":"2017-04-04T00:25:19","slug":"on-teaching-evolution-objectively-alabama-is-right-in-step-with-the-vast-majority-of-americans-discovery-institute","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/evolution\/on-teaching-evolution-objectively-alabama-is-right-in-step-with-the-vast-majority-of-americans-discovery-institute\/","title":{"rendered":"On Teaching Evolution Objectively, Alabama Is Right In Step with the Vast Majority of Americans &#8211; Discovery Institute"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Recently the Alabama House of Representatives passed House    Joint Resolution 78, an academic freedom resolution that would    protect teachers who help students understand, analyze,    critique, and review in an objective manner the scientific    strengths and scientific weaknesses of existing scientific    theories covered in the course being taught.  <\/p>\n<p>    Alabamas House should be applauded for taking a proactive step    that will benefit Alabama students, who will learn critical    thinking, practice scientific inquiry, and delve into    more scientific evidence. This resolution advances    high-quality, active, and engaging science instruction.  <\/p>\n<p>    And Alabama is right in step with the rest of the country. A    recent national poll     revealed that fully 93 percent of American adults agree    that teachers and students should have the academic freedom to    objectively discuss both the scientific strengths and    weaknesses of the theory of evolution.  <\/p>\n<p>    Both the nationwide poll and Alabamas resolution are also in    line with what Discovery Institute has advocated for science    education for the past two decades. Discoverys Science Education Policy    states that  <\/p>\n<p>      evolution should be fully and completely presented to      students, and they should learn more about evolutionary      theory, including its unresolved issues. In other words,      evolution should be taught as a scientific theory that is      open to critical scrutiny, not as a sacred dogma that cant      be questioned.    <\/p>\n<p>        HJR 78, sponsored by Representative Mack Butler and 28 of    his colleagues in the House, takes much the same approach. The    resolution simply supports academic freedom for teachers who    wish to discuss scientific evidence for and against evolution,    and other scientific theories already in the state curriculum.  <\/p>\n<p>    Unfortunately, the media have distorted the legislation. So    what else is new?  <\/p>\n<p>        Yellowhammer News, for one, claimed the bill would    introduce intelligent design in the classroom:  <\/p>\n<p>      House Joint Resolution 78 was filed by Rep. Mack Butler (R-      Rainbow City), who served as a school board member of Etowah      County Schools for 10 years. The legislation aims not to      remove discussion of evolution in the classroom, but to      broaden scientific conversations to include conversation over      intelligent design. Related subjects that are addressed by      the bill include global warming and human cloning.    <\/p>\n<p>    No, HJR 78 is not about introducing intelligent design into    classrooms. It applies solely to theories already in the    curriculum  and intelligent design is not in the curriculum    anywhere in Alabama.  <\/p>\n<p>    Representative Butler defends the resolution and explains that    it adds nothing new to the existing curriculum.  <\/p>\n<p>      Certainly, when teaching on controversial topics, classroom      discussions already may touch on theories and ideas that are      not part of the curriculum. That just comes with free speech      and we should welcome such discussions. HJR 78 doesnt change      that.    <\/p>\n<p>    Discovery has always maintained that students questions are    protected free speech, but that is very different from    mandating that a teacher insert entirely new material into the    curriculum. The resolution doesnt support that.  <\/p>\n<p>    Butler is clear about what the resolution does do:  <\/p>\n<p>      The real focus of HJR 78 is on scientific subjects required      to be taught under the curriculum framework developed by the      State Board of Education. So the resolution does not change      the curriculum.    <\/p>\n<p>      HJR 78 does expressly support teachers in engaging their      students in examining the scientific strengths and weaknesses      of those topics currently being taught. Science is      characterized by open-minded critical analysis of data, and      Alabama students will benefit from gaining more knowledge      about subjects being studied and learning to reason like      scientists.    <\/p>\n<p>    To head off further media misinformation, lets say it again.    What specifically does the resolution call for? It says    educational leadership and teachers  <\/p>\n<p>      should endeavor to create an environment within public      elementary and secondary schools that encourages students to      explore scientific questions, develop critical thinking      skills, analyze the scientific strengths and weaknesses of      scientific explanations, and respond appropriately and      respectfully to differences of opinion about scientific      subjects required to be taught under the curriculum framework      developed by the State Board of Education.    <\/p>\n<p>    Moreover, educational leadership  <\/p>\n<p>      should refrain from prohibiting any teacher in a public      school system of this state from helping students understand,      analyze, critique, and review in an objective manner the      scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of existing      scientific theories covered in the course being taught within      the curriculum framework developed by the State Board of      Education.    <\/p>\n<p>    It is all too common for teachers to feel intimidated and thus    simply avoid teaching scientific information about origins.    This poorly serves the interests of students. The resolution    supports protecting teachers and advancing education     something approved by the overwhelming majority of Americans.  <\/p>\n<p>    None of this is difficult to understand. Why is it so    challenging for the media to simply report the basic facts?  <\/p>\n<p>    Photo: Alabama State Capitol, by Carol M. Highsmith [Public    domain],     via Wikimedia Commons.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Original post:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.evolutionnews.org\/2017\/04\/on-teaching-evolution-objectively-alabama-is-right-in-step-with-the-vast-majority-of-americans\/\" title=\"On Teaching Evolution Objectively, Alabama Is Right In Step with the Vast Majority of Americans - Discovery Institute\">On Teaching Evolution Objectively, Alabama Is Right In Step with the Vast Majority of Americans - Discovery Institute<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Recently the Alabama House of Representatives passed House Joint Resolution 78, an academic freedom resolution that would protect teachers who help students understand, analyze, critique, and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of existing scientific theories covered in the course being taught. Alabamas House should be applauded for taking a proactive step that will benefit Alabama students, who will learn critical thinking, practice scientific inquiry, and delve into more scientific evidence. This resolution advances high-quality, active, and engaging science instruction <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/evolution\/on-teaching-evolution-objectively-alabama-is-right-in-step-with-the-vast-majority-of-americans-discovery-institute\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187748],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-186225","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-evolution"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186225"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=186225"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186225\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=186225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=186225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=186225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}