The UK think tank Compass, which published the 2016 report Universal Basic Income: An idea whose time has come? by Howard Reed and Stewart Lansley, recently launched the blog series on the topic of basic income (Universal Basic Income: Security for the Future?). <\/p>\n
Two pieces in the series are Coming off the fence on UBI? by Ruth Lister (chair of the Compass Management Committee and Emeritus Professor at Loughborough University) and, in reply to Listers contribution, Basic Income and Institutional Transformation by Louise Haagh (co-chair of the Basic Income Earth Network and Reader at the University of York). <\/p>\n
Lister expresses much sympathy toward UBI, in part due to its challenge to the contemporary fetishisation of paid work. At the same time, however, she questions the total lack of conditionality on benefits on grounds of both ethics (is it fair to subsidize the right to be lazy?) and feasibility (would the idea garner enough political support?) and notes a participation income, as defended by the late Tony Atkinson, as a potential compromise. In the end, though, she states that for all my ambivalence, I am coming round to the idea of a UBI as a means of ensuring everyone a modicum of basic security in an increasingly insecure world. <\/p>\n
Haagh, writing in part in response to Lister, argues for UBI as a way to fundamentally reconceptualize the relationship between citizens and the state. She emphasizes that removing conditionalities on a basic level of economic support does not entail a general separation of income from work (since monetary remuneration for work would continue to exist). Neither, in her view, should a basic income be seen as a challenge to the work ethic. Instead, according to Haagh, the removal of conditionalities should be seen as a way to enable individuals to think and plan for the long term. Conditional income support, as she puts it, aims to motivate people in the short-term, with a heavy dose of stick. For example, beneficiaries risk losing their most basic support if they do not take the first job offered regardless of the job. The punitive nature of conditional benefits encourages short-term thinking aimed at mere self-preservation. In contrast, an unconditional basic income provides a floor on which individuals can engage in long-term strategizing. <\/p>\n
Reviewed by Russell Ingram <\/p>\n
Photo: Welfare Office CC BY 2.0Jacob Norlund <\/p>\n
Kate McFarland has written 394 articles. <\/p>\n
Kate began reporting for Basic Income News in March 2016, and joined BIEN's Executive Committee in July 2016. She is also Secretary of BIEN's US affiliate, the US Basic Income Guarantee Network. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
View original post here: <\/p>\n
Compass Blog Series: "Universal Basic Income: Security for the ... - Basic Income News<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The UK think tank Compass, which published the 2016 report Universal Basic Income: An idea whose time has come? by Howard Reed and Stewart Lansley, recently launched the blog series on the topic of basic income (Universal Basic Income: Security for the Future?). Continue reading