{"id":185604,"date":"2017-03-31T07:01:04","date_gmt":"2017-03-31T11:01:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/intel-corporation-outs-14-nanometer-technology-motley-fool\/"},"modified":"2017-03-31T07:01:04","modified_gmt":"2017-03-31T11:01:04","slug":"intel-corporation-outs-14-nanometer-technology-motley-fool","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/technology\/intel-corporation-outs-14-nanometer-technology-motley-fool\/","title":{"rendered":"Intel Corporation Outs 14-Nanometer++ Technology &#8211; Motley Fool"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Last year, Intel    (NASDAQ:INTC)    began shipping products based on a technology that it refers to    as 14-nanometer+. This is a performance-enhanced version of the    company's initial 14-nanometer technology that first went into    production in 2014. Intel claims a 12% improvement.  <\/p>\n<p>    That technology is currently being used to manufacture the    company's seventh-generation Core processor family -- Intel's    current personal-computer processor product line spanning    notebook and desktop computers -- and is expected to be used to    build the company's upcoming Skylake Xeon processors for data    centers.  <\/p>\n<p>      Image source: Intel.    <\/p>\n<p>    Later this year, Intel plans to start building products using a    further refined version of its 14-nanometer technology marketed    as 14-nanometer++.  <\/p>\n<p>    Let's take a closer look at what Intel had to say about this    technology and what it should mean for the company's future    products built using this technology.  <\/p>\n<p>    Intel claims that 14-nanometer++ delivers either 26% better    performance compared with its original 14-nanometer technology,    implying a 12.5% improvement over 14-nanometer+, or up to 52%    lower power.  <\/p>\n<p>      Image source: Intel.    <\/p>\n<p>    Moreover, Intel says its 14-nanometer++ technology delivers at    least 20% better transistor performance than competing 14- and    16-nanometer technologies from rivals Samsung    (NASDAQOTH:SSNLF)    and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company    (NYSE:TSM).  <\/p>\n<p>    As we saw when Intel moved from 14-nanometer to 14-nanometer+,    those performance enhancements on the manufacturing side can    translate into nice performance gains at the product level. For    example, Intel's Core i7-6640U for notebooks came rated with a    base frequency of 2.4GHz and a maximum turbo frequency of    3.4GHz.  <\/p>\n<p>    The 14-nanometer+ version of this chip -- the Core i7-7660 --    runs at a base frequency of 2.5GHz and delivers a maximum turbo    speed of 4GHz. Maximum turbo to maximum turbo, we see a nearly    18% jump in frequency because of the migration to 14-nanometer+    and the other enhancements Intel probably did to the underlying    circuit design of the chip.  <\/p>\n<p>    Even in the high-performance desktop market, Intel's    14-nanometer+ technology delivered nice gains. The Core    i7-6700K gaming chip came rated at a base speed of 4GHz, and it    could run a single core at up to 4.2GHz. The successor to this    chip, built on 14-nanometer+, ran at a base speed of 4.2GHz,    single-core turbo of 4.5GHz, and all-core turbo of 4.4GHz.  <\/p>\n<p>    I would expect, then, Intel's 14-nanometer++ technology to help    deliver a solid improvement in product performance when it    rolls out later this year. More on that in a future    column.  <\/p>\n<p>    At its Technology and Manufacturing Day, Intel spent a good    deal of time talking up the advantages of its technologies    relative to competing technologies. Intel claimed that its    14-nanometer++ technology will be at least 20% faster than    competing 14- and 16-nanometer technologies, and it claims that    its 14-nanometer technology is about 30% denser than competing    14- and 16-nanometer technologies.  <\/p>\n<p>    However, I don't believe that both statements are    likely to be true simultaneously.  <\/p>\n<p>    For example, in moving from 14-nanometer+ to 14-nanometer++,    Intel says it's relaxing the transistor gate pitch from 70 to    84 nanometers. This certainly helps Intel improve performance,    but it will undoubtedly come at some cost to chip-level    transistor density.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is a good trade-off, especially since consumers are more    interested in higher performance than in the density of the    manufacturing technology that's used to build the chips inside    their computers, but Intel's marketing makes it seem as if    14-nanometer++ delivers the density and performance advantages    simultaneously, which I'm not happy about.  <\/p>\n<p>    Intel has committed to delivering newer, better products to the    market on an annual cadence, and the company's work to deliver    14-nanometer++ and products built on that technology should    allow it to fulfill that promise.  <\/p>\n<p>    What I'd like to see from Intel now is sustained execution with    respect to these annual product improvements. If it can deliver    on this promise in the years ahead, then it should be in solid    shape across its business units.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ashraf Eassa    owns shares of Intel. The Motley Fool recommends Intel. The    Motley Fool has a disclosure    policy.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Continue reading here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/investing\/2017\/03\/30\/intel-corporation-outs-14-nanometer-technology.aspx\" title=\"Intel Corporation Outs 14-Nanometer++ Technology - Motley Fool\">Intel Corporation Outs 14-Nanometer++ Technology - Motley Fool<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Last year, Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) began shipping products based on a technology that it refers to as 14-nanometer+.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/technology\/intel-corporation-outs-14-nanometer-technology-motley-fool\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187726],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-185604","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185604"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185604"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185604\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185604"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185604"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185604"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}