Every fall, Fiona Marshall's home is besieged by legions of mice. <\/p>\n
They drive me crazy ... trying to colonize our pantry, said Marshall, a professor at Washington University in St. Louis. <\/p>\n
It would be easy to think of the furry little creatures as invaders. But Marshall knows that they are here only because of us. In a study published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Marshall and her colleagues trace house mice to their origins 15,000 years ago, when they evolved alongside the first humans who built semi-permanenthomes. <\/p>\n
This is a story about mice, and mice and humans have a really interesting history together, she said. But even more broadly ... it tells us about humans and our influenceon our environmentand our world. <\/p>\n
According to Marshall, house mice are an important example of animal-human commensalism a relationship in which an animal benefits from humans without affecting them. At the end of the Ice Age, an ancient people called the Natufians settled in the Levant, where they builtthe world's first semi-permanent stone dwellings. Shortly after, mice evolved to take advantage of that new habitat. The emerging species,Mus musculus domesticus, benefitedfrom the scraps of food and protection from predators that human homes provided. <\/p>\n
Without meaning to, humans had created a new ecological niche and nature swiftly filled it. Evolution hates a void. <\/p>\n
[Neanderthal microbes reveal surprises about what they ate and whom they kissed] <\/p>\n
It's one of the earliest cases of animals evolving to take advantage of environments changed by humans,Marshallsaid. And it's surprising becauseit happened before widespread agriculture, the event that scientists traditionally associate with the origins of domestication. <\/p>\n
It shows that, even 15,000 years ago, hunter-gatherers were exerting enough influence on their environment to transform an animal species, Marshall said. <\/p>\n
Marshall and lead author LiorWeissbrod, now a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Haifa in Israel, are bothzooarcheologists. We'repeople who look at animal bones in order to be able to understand the human past in different ways, Marshall said. <\/p>\n
Inspired by the work of Israeli scientist Eitan Tchernov, who arguedthat the presence of certain animal companions could be used to understandancient humans' lifestyles, Weissbrod set about examining 200,000 yearsof mouse fossils from the Levant. At the end of the Ice Age, he found, two closely related species of mouse were present: Mus macedonicus andMus musculus domesticus. The formerhasshort tails (which are harder for predators to latch onto) and lives in groves and shrub lands; the latter has a long tailand is adapted to live in human homes. <\/p>\n
The relative dominance of each species sharply reflected the activity of the Levant's human population at the time. Before the rise of the Natufian culture, all the fossils Weissbrod found were M.macedonicus.Then, in the early Natufian period, the domesticus type took over. Later on, when archaeological records indicate the climate got drier and Natufians were forced to abandon their stone dwellings, macedonicus was resurgent. But as humans settled down, domesticus became dominant once more. <\/p>\n
Archaeologists don't know how committed the Natufians were to the settled lifestyle. They were not farmers, so they probably had to travel at least part of the year in pursuit of food. Marshall said that some researchers believe that the Natufians' stone dwellings were like summer homes, utilized only a few months out of the year. <\/p>\n
Butit appeared thatthese hunter-gatherers stayed put long enough to have an effect on the mouse communities nearby. <\/p>\n
[Ancient Romans depicted Huns as barbarians. Their bones tell a different story.] <\/p>\n
It created a household ecology or villageecology, she said. That was a new world for a mouse to live in. ...It changes the food availability, the predatory pressures, everything about the environment. <\/p>\n
Marshall and Weissbrod thought thatNatufian-mouse scenario could be a model for othercommensal relationships. But they wanted to test whether mouse bodies really do evolve in response to human migration. So Weissbrod looked to a modern seminomadic community, the Masai people of Kenya. <\/p>\n
In times when this pastoralist community moved a lot, its rodentcompanions were mainly the short-tailed Acomys wilsoni the African counterpart of the Levant's Mus macedonicus. But if the tribe settled for more than a month or so, the demographics would shift, and the long-tailed, more commensal species Acomys ignitus dominated. This finding seemed to confirm Marshall and Weissbrod's theories about mobility and mouse evolution. <\/p>\n
Living in one place was a really important factor affecting the beginnings of domestication, Marshall said, and it happened earlier than we thought. <\/p>\n
Read more: <\/p>\n
This black hole is being pushed around its galaxy by gravitational waves <\/p>\n
Trump signs NASA bill aimed at sending people to Mars <\/p>\n
Ancient Romans depicted Huns as barbarians. Their bones tell a different story. <\/p>\n
A new definition would add 102 planets to our solar system including Pluto <\/p>\n
NASA just found an orbiter that's been missing around the moon for 8 years <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
More here: Every fall, Fiona Marshall's home is besieged by legions of mice. They drive me crazy .. Continue reading
\nMice have been infesting homes ever since humans started building them - Washington Post<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"