{"id":185085,"date":"2017-03-27T05:20:21","date_gmt":"2017-03-27T09:20:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/peace-in-korea-being-libertarian\/"},"modified":"2017-03-27T05:20:21","modified_gmt":"2017-03-27T09:20:21","slug":"peace-in-korea-being-libertarian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/libertarian\/peace-in-korea-being-libertarian\/","title":{"rendered":"Peace in Korea &#8211; Being Libertarian"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    It is well known that the two Koreas have co-existed in a state    of mutual disdain for each other since the end of combat    operations in the region, just over 60 years ago. North Korea,    backed by China, and South Korea, backed by the U.S., have    constantly perceived any military buildup performed by the    other to be aggressions on their respective sovereignties. This    usually results in the nation that feels threatened engaging in    a retaliatory action involving some form of military posturing    that escalates tensions in the region for a time.  <\/p>\n<p>    The most recent example of this scenario occurred Monday, March    6. According to a     report by The Guardian, North Korea fired four missiles in    response to an annual military exercise between South Korean    and American forces. Meanwhile, according to Reuters, the U.S.    has begun the     installation of the Terminal High Altitude Defense    anti-missile system, otherwise known as THAAD, in South Korea    as a defense against the North. The military exercises, firing    of missiles, and installation of THAAD are causing tensions to    rise drastically between the countries involved in the region.    According to the same Reuters article mentioned above, the    North and South have expelled each others diplomats and    prohibited the exit of each others citizens. Furthermore,    China and South Korea have now entered into a diplomatic    standoff with each other, which even involves China closing    down some of the South Korean Lotte Groups retail stores.  <\/p>\n<p>    All of these factors definitely make for a precarious situation    among the four nations involved. However, it appears China is    not yet ready to throw in the diplomatic towel. China has    expressed frustrations with North Koreas attempts at    developing a nuclear missile program and has even     halted the import of coal for a year in an effort to get    the North to abandon its nuclear weapons program.  <\/p>\n<p>    China has recently offered a possible diplomatic solution to    this whole situation. The Associated Press reports that Chinese    Foreign Minister Wang Yi has suggested that     North Korea might stall its missile programs if the U.S.s and    South Koreas military exercises are also stalled. It would    seem that Wang and China would like for all the parties    involved to sit down and discuss the issues between them. This    offering by China may not only be a way to avoid conflict, it    may also pave the way for a more peaceful co-existence in the    region and provide the U.S. with the perfect opportunity to    extricate itself permanently from the affairs of East Asia.  <\/p>\n<p>    The U.S. has been presented with an amazing opportunity. Wangs    solution is brilliant, as it has not only North Korea, but also    the South and the U.S. end their strategic posturing. This    simple act would not only show that all countries involved are    willing to come together and work out their differences    peacefully, but may also be the only chance for the U.S. to    begin pursuing a non-interventionist policy in East Asia.  <\/p>\n<p>    Chinas solution of having both sides halt their respective    military activities would easily open the door to the lessening    of hostilities in the region. With the lessening of    hostilities, the next step would be to begin removing U.S.    troops from the region in order to de-emphasize the threat a    foreign army presents. This would establish an atmosphere where    the work for peace could truly begin. This work toward peace    should place emphasis on trade, for nations who are engaged in    trade with one another are far less likely to go to war with    one another.  <\/p>\n<p>    Of course, the odds of North Korea accepting anything close to    a peaceful solution are probably extremely long. However, this    does not mean that the U.S. should not pursue the present    opportunity. Any opportunity for peace, no matter how slim the    chances, should never be ignored.  <\/p>\n<p>    The U.S. military has been in and around the Korean Peninsula    for over 60 years. Official policy is that U.S. troops are    there to deter the North from invading the South. During that    whole time, however, North Korea has done nothing more than    isolate itself from the international community and act hostile    to the presence of a foreign army near its borders. The    interventionist policy of the U.S. is not working. North Korea    will never be made less extreme by the military might of a    foreign nation. The only way to accomplish that goal is through    trade. The U.S. should significantly reduce its military    presence in the region. Then, it should begin encouraging more    trade in the area. China is already one of the U.S.s largest    trade partners. There is no reason to think that China would    say no to more trade with the U.S. Plus, once the U.S. ended    its military intervention in the region, China and South Korea    would no longer have reason to remain in a diplomatic standoff.    They would begin engaging in business with each other again.    Soon, North Korea would either have to watch everyone around it    prosper or end its isolationism in order to join in.  <\/p>\n<p>    However, none of this will ever have the opportunity to happen    if the U.S. and South Korea brushed aside Chinas offer.    Therefore, it is of the utmost importance that they accept the    offer for peaceful diplomacy. A peaceful solution must be    sought, or we will see this opportunity slip away without    another one in sight.  <\/p>\n<p>    Libertarians everywhere would love to see the U.S. adopt a    non-interventionist foreign policy. We all believe that such a    policy would be ideal for this country. However, such a thing    will not happen overnight. It will take liberty lovers pushing    to slowly chip away bit by bit the interventionist policy of    our leaders before our dream can be accomplished. Today, we    have presented before us one such opportunity. Let us not allow    it to go to waste.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Jon Swain is a recent convert to the liberty movement after    becoming disillusioned with Republican politics in the 2016    election cycle. He is currently earning his B.S. in Kinesiology    from Mississippi State University and plans to pursue a    Masters of Science after graduation.  <\/p>\n<p>    Photo: Ed Jones  <\/p>\n<p>      Like Loading...    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>More:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/beinglibertarian.com\/peace-in-korea\/\" title=\"Peace in Korea - Being Libertarian\">Peace in Korea - Being Libertarian<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> It is well known that the two Koreas have co-existed in a state of mutual disdain for each other since the end of combat operations in the region, just over 60 years ago. North Korea, backed by China, and South Korea, backed by the U.S., have constantly perceived any military buildup performed by the other to be aggressions on their respective sovereignties. This usually results in the nation that feels threatened engaging in a retaliatory action involving some form of military posturing that escalates tensions in the region for a time.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/libertarian\/peace-in-korea-being-libertarian\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187826],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-185085","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-libertarian"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185085"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185085"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185085\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185085"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185085"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185085"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}