{"id":185050,"date":"2017-03-27T05:10:45","date_gmt":"2017-03-27T09:10:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/lawmakers-want-infrastructure-funded-by-offshore-tax-reform-thehill-the-hill\/"},"modified":"2017-03-27T05:10:45","modified_gmt":"2017-03-27T09:10:45","slug":"lawmakers-want-infrastructure-funded-by-offshore-tax-reform-thehill-the-hill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/offshore\/lawmakers-want-infrastructure-funded-by-offshore-tax-reform-thehill-the-hill\/","title":{"rendered":"Lawmakers want infrastructure funded by offshore tax reform | TheHill &#8211; The Hill"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    A bipartisan group of lawmakers thinks the key to uniting    Republicans and Democrats around a massive infrastructure    package is coupling it with a sweetener for conservatives: tax    reform.  <\/p>\n<p>    Reps. John Delaney (D-Md.), Ted    YohoTed YohoLawmakers    want infrastructure funded by offshore tax reform     Defying Trump, Freedom Caucus insists it'll oppose GOP    ObamaCare replacement     The Hill's Whip List: 36 GOP no votes on ObamaCare repeal    plan MORE    (R-Fla.) and Rodney Davis (R-Ill.) have pushed the concept for    years. But now the group  who came to Congress together in    2013  might have their best shot yet.  <\/p>\n<p>    These two ideas were working on are better poised to become a    reality than the entire time weve served together over the    past four and a half years, Davis said in a sit-down with    reporters this week. President Trump has brought the debate to    the forefront.  <\/p>\n<p>    Delaney, Yoho and Davis are seizing on that momentum and    renewing their effort to link international tax reform with    infrastructure spending.  <\/p>\n<p>    The group introduced two bills this week aimed at tapping into    cash overseas that would use the money to upgrade U.S. roads,    bridges and other public works. An estimated $2 trillion in    earnings is stashed overseas, they say.  <\/p>\n<p>    One measure sponsored by Delaney and Davis would establish a    $50 billion infrastructure bank to finance local    transportation, energy, water and education projects.  <\/p>\n<p>    The bank, which would put an emphasis on public-private    partnerships, would be funded through the sale of 50-year bonds    to U.S. corporations that want to repatriate overseas earnings.    In turn, the companies would be allowed to bring a certain    amount of overseas earnings back to the U.S. with no federal    tax liability for every $1 invested in the bonds.  <\/p>\n<p>    The other bill, from Delaney and Yoho, would allow U.S.    multinational corporations to repatriate earnings at a    mandatory, one-time tax of 8.75 percent, a discount on the    current 35 percent rate and deferral option.  <\/p>\n<p>    Those revenues would be used to improve the nations    infrastructure, with an estimated $120 billion going to the    Highway Trust Fund, $50 billion going to an infrastructure bank    and $25 million going to a pilot program focused on rural    infrastructure.  <\/p>\n<p>    The legislation also sets an 18-month deadline for    international tax reform and creates a panel to explore    long-term funding solutions for financing the ailing Highway    Trust Fund.  <\/p>\n<p>    Its giving each side something they really cared about for a    while, Delaney said. Democrats have really made    infrastructure one of our top priorities. My colleagues on the    other side of the aisle have made fixing this broken    international tax system a priority.  <\/p>\n<p>    The lawmakers make strange bedfellows. Yoho is a member of the    ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus, Davis is a rural    Republican who supports medical marijuana and lifting Cuba    restrictions and Delaney is a wealthy former banker who    represents part of the Washington, D.C., suburbs.  <\/p>\n<p>    But the lawmakers, who traded both barbs and compliments during    their sit-down with reporters during an otherwise tense and    partisan week on Capitol Hill focused on healthcare, say they    share the common goal of boosting the economy through    infrastructure investment.  <\/p>\n<p>    The trio believes their legislation can bridge the partisan gap    in Congress.  <\/p>\n<p>    Fiscal conservatives have been reluctant to back massive    federal spending on transportation, especially if it blows a    massive hole in the deficit. But tax reform may be one way to    get them on board.  <\/p>\n<p>    Infrastructure was something I campaigned on as a Republican,    which there wasnt exactly a hot bed of conservative support    for, Davis said. Its going to take Republicans like me and    Democrats like John to be able to come together and understand    how do we actually pay for those projects.  <\/p>\n<p>    Yoho said the Trump administration, which is collecting funding    ideas as it begins to craft a comprehensive infrastructure    bill, appears to have some appetite for the idea.  <\/p>\n<p>    The chairmen of the House and Senate Transportation committees,    Rep. Bill Shuster (R-Pa.) and Sen. John    ThuneJohn ThuneLawmakers    want infrastructure funded by offshore tax reform     Senate GOP hedges on ObamaCare repeal timeline Week    ahead: Robocall crackdown tops FCC meeting agenda MORE    (R-S.D.), respectively, have also signaled interest in using    repatriation to pay for the plan.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ive shared this with [Vice President] Mike    PenceMike (Michael)    Richard PencePence    meets his 'second-favorite Ron and Nancy'     Sanford: 'Testosterone can get you in trouble'     Flynn discussed how to 'whisk' away cleric wanted by Turkey:    report MORE    and said these are the things we have, Yoho said. And Mike    Pence says, You know what, youve brought this up to me    before. Were seriously looking at it.  <\/p>\n<p>    So I feel were making headway on it, Yoho added.  <\/p>\n<p>    But even though Trump and Congress have both signaled interest    in tackling tax reform and infrastructure this year, that    doesnt mean they will dovetail together.  <\/p>\n<p>    For one thing, lawmakers tasked with writing tax laws have been    reluctant to commit to spending the cash from repatriation on    infrastructure. Instead, they prefer to use that money to    overhaul the tax code, and there are questions over whether    theres enough revenue to effectively accomplish both.  <\/p>\n<p>    And Trump and leadership have both suggested that tax reform    will come before infrastructure, which could spell trouble for    the trios legislation if repatriation gets all used up.  <\/p>\n<p>    If you sequence these things, so you do tax reform first and    infrastructure second  the chances of the people doing tax    reform setting aside some money for some future infrastructure    discussion are non-existent, Delaney said. Unless    infrastructure has a seat at the table, it will be much    harder.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Originally posted here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/policy\/transportation\/infrastructure\/325555-lawmakers-want-infrastructure-funded-by-offshore-tax\" title=\"Lawmakers want infrastructure funded by offshore tax reform | TheHill - The Hill\">Lawmakers want infrastructure funded by offshore tax reform | TheHill - The Hill<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> A bipartisan group of lawmakers thinks the key to uniting Republicans and Democrats around a massive infrastructure package is coupling it with a sweetener for conservatives: tax reform. Reps. John Delaney (D-Md.), Ted YohoTed YohoLawmakers want infrastructure funded by offshore tax reform Defying Trump, Freedom Caucus insists it'll oppose GOP ObamaCare replacement The Hill's Whip List: 36 GOP no votes on ObamaCare repeal plan MORE (R-Fla.) and Rodney Davis (R-Ill.) have pushed the concept for years.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/offshore\/lawmakers-want-infrastructure-funded-by-offshore-tax-reform-thehill-the-hill\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187814],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-185050","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-offshore"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185050"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185050"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185050\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185050"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185050"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185050"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}