Gene editing technology will inevitably lead to eugenics and thats a good thing, says Adam Cohen, the author of Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck. <\/p>\n
Cohens book relates the tragic story of a young woman from Virginia who was forcibly sterilised. Her case went all the way to the US Supreme Court, which concluded, in the notorious words of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Three generations ofimbecilesare enough. That case marked the highwater mark of the American eugenics movement. But Nazi atrocities almost completely discredited the idea. <\/p>\n
However, writing in an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Cohen, like an increasing number of bioethicists, distinguishes between bad eugenics and good eugenics. The former is totalitarian and involuntary; the latter is individual and discretionary. He strongly supports the idea of embryo editing: This time around, eugenics could be a force for good. <\/p>\n
... we should also recognize that there is a crucial difference between the old eugenics and the new. Rather than demonizing unfit people and working to sterilize them, the new eugenics regards their inherited disabilities as treatable medical conditions and seeks to help them have healthy children. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Link:<\/p>\n
Making eugenics acceptable again - BioEdge<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Gene editing technology will inevitably lead to eugenics and thats a good thing, says Adam Cohen, the author of Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck. Continue reading