{"id":184917,"date":"2017-03-27T04:45:32","date_gmt":"2017-03-27T08:45:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/technology-facilitated-abuse-the-new-breed-of-domestic-violence-abc-online\/"},"modified":"2017-03-27T04:45:32","modified_gmt":"2017-03-27T08:45:32","slug":"technology-facilitated-abuse-the-new-breed-of-domestic-violence-abc-online","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/technology\/technology-facilitated-abuse-the-new-breed-of-domestic-violence-abc-online\/","title":{"rendered":"Technology-facilitated abuse: The new breed of domestic violence &#8211; ABC Online"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>By Hadeel Al-Alosi, Western Sydney University    <\/p>\n<p>    Posted March 27, 2017 19:10:27  <\/p>\n<p>    Domestic violence is a serious issue in Australia and globally.  <\/p>\n<p>    It is an inherently gendered crime. Research consistently shows the overwhelming    majority of offenders are male and the victims are female.  <\/p>\n<p>    Australian governments have recently taken a strong stand    against domestic violence, focusing mainly on preventing    physical forms of abuse.  <\/p>\n<p>    For example, in 2015, the Council of Australian Governments    (COAG) announced it would implement a $30    million campaign designed to reduce domestic violence against    women and their children.  <\/p>\n<p>    Another example is the New South Wales Government's Domestic Violence Strategy    2013-2017, which aims to improve the criminal justice    system's response to domestic violence.  <\/p>\n<p>    But what is missing from these strategies is a focus on    technology-facilitated domestic violence.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is a form of domestic violence that provides abusers a    pervasive way to control, coerce, stalk and harass their    victims.  <\/p>\n<p>    It involves a range of behaviours. These include sending    abusive text messages or emails, making continuous threatening    phone calls, spying on and monitoring victims through the use    of tracking systems, abusing victims on social media sites, and    sharing intimate photos of the victim without their consent    (\"revenge porn\").  <\/p>\n<p>    A well-publicised example of    technology-facilitated domestic violence is the 2010 incident    involving Lara Bingle, whose nude images were shared without    her consent by her former partner, Brendan Fevola.  <\/p>\n<p>    The first Australian study conducted to specifically    investigate the use of technology in the context of domestic    violence is the 2013 SmartSafe Project.  <\/p>\n<p>    The study involved surveying 152 domestic violence caseworkers    and 46 victims in Victoria.  <\/p>\n<p>    Almost all of the caseworkers who participated in the survey    (98 per cent) said their clients had experienced    technology-facilitated abuse by a former partner.  <\/p>\n<p>    Five of the most commonly used technology and online platforms    by abusers are:  <\/p>\n<p>    Other Australian studies further highlight that    technology-facilitated domestic violence is prevalent and has    significant \"real world\" implications.  <\/p>\n<p>    For example, in its review of domestic violence homicides    occurring between 2000 to 2012, the NSW Domestic Violence Death Review Team    observed that technology was commonly being used by abusers to    stalk, monitor, and control their intimate partners while the    relationship was on foot.  <\/p>\n<p>    This challenges:  <\/p>\n<p>      \" ... misconceptions that stalking behaviours usually only      manifest after the relationship has ended.\"    <\/p>\n<p>    On an international level, the United Nations, in its 2015 \"wake up\" report,    estimated that 73 per cent of females worldwide have endured    online abuse.  <\/p>\n<p>    The report also urged countries to recognise that online abuse    can be just as damaging as physical violence, and has negative    consequences:  <\/p>\n<p>      \" ... for all societies in general and irreparable damage for      girls and women in particular.\"    <\/p>\n<p>    Given the ubiquity of digital communication devices, it is    unsurprising that some people are misusing technology to abuse    and harass their current or former intimate partners.  <\/p>\n<p>    Unfortunately, technology-facilitated abuse has been given    little, if any, attention in government initiatives aimed at    tackling domestic violence.  <\/p>\n<p>    For example, the Domestic Violence Strategy does not mention    technology-facilitated domestic violence.  <\/p>\n<p>    There are federal and state laws that may deal with some forms    of digital abuse  for example, stalking offences or using a    carriage service to menace and harass someone.  <\/p>\n<p>    But there needs to be a coordinated national response, rather    than a patchwork of legislation throughout Australia.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is especially true given the borderless nature of the    internet.  <\/p>\n<p>    This allows abusers to traverse geographical barriers to reach    their victims through the use of technology.  <\/p>\n<p>    It is also evident that there needs to be non-legal initiatives    that focus on perpetrator accountability and challenge    victim-blaming attitudes.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the SmartSafe Project, it was reported that:  <\/p>\n<p>      \" ... often police put the responsibility back onto the woman      and say she should stop visiting Facebook or using devices.\"    <\/p>\n<p>    In 2016 federal parliamentary debates,    it was also suggested that domestic violence victims take extra    precautionary steps by:  <\/p>\n<p>      \"Shut[ting] off GPS and wi-fi, stay away from social media       Twitter, Facebook, Instagram; whatever  and remember that      the perpetrator will be monitoring the sites of your family      and friends to see you wherever you are, because you might      pop up; they might take photos of you. So please make sure      that children do the same.\"    <\/p>\n<p>    Victims (and their children) should not be told to abandon    their digital communications.  <\/p>\n<p>    The focus should instead be on holding abusers to account.  <\/p>\n<p>    Telling victims to forsake their online presence effectively    drives women offline, marking the internet as yet another    male-dominated space.  <\/p>\n<p>    The aim should be to prevent perpetrators from further abusing    victims through the use of technology, and ultimately changing    misogynist and victim-blaming attitudes.  <\/p>\n<p>    The National Sexual Assault, Family & Domestic Violence    Counselling Line  1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)  is available    24 hours a day, seven days a week for any Australian who has    experienced, or is at risk of, family and domestic violence    and\/or sexual assault.  <\/p>\n<p>    Hadeel Al-Alosi is a lecturer at Western Sydney    University's School of Law. She has a strong interest in the    work of community legal centres and addressing access to    justice issues for vulnerable groups.  <\/p>\n<p>    Originally published in The Conversation  <\/p>\n<p>    Topics: assault, crime, community-and-society,    domestic-violence,    australia, nsw  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.abc.net.au\/news\/2017-03-27\/technology-facilitated-abuse-the-new-breed-of-domestic-violence\/8390374\" title=\"Technology-facilitated abuse: The new breed of domestic violence - ABC Online\">Technology-facilitated abuse: The new breed of domestic violence - ABC Online<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> By Hadeel Al-Alosi, Western Sydney University Posted March 27, 2017 19:10:27 Domestic violence is a serious issue in Australia and globally. It is an inherently gendered crime.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/technology\/technology-facilitated-abuse-the-new-breed-of-domestic-violence-abc-online\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187726],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-184917","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184917"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=184917"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184917\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=184917"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=184917"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=184917"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}