{"id":184529,"date":"2017-03-23T13:33:36","date_gmt":"2017-03-23T17:33:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/us-man-loses-appeal-in-child-porn-encrypted-device-legal-case-zdnet\/"},"modified":"2017-03-23T13:33:36","modified_gmt":"2017-03-23T17:33:36","slug":"us-man-loses-appeal-in-child-porn-encrypted-device-legal-case-zdnet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fifth-amendment\/us-man-loses-appeal-in-child-porn-encrypted-device-legal-case-zdnet\/","title":{"rendered":"US man loses appeal in child porn encrypted device legal case &#8230; &#8211; ZDNet"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Malwarebytes  <\/p>\n<p>    A US man has lost an appeal over his refusal to decrypt hard    drives in a case law enforcement says involves child    pornography.  <\/p>\n<p>    The unnamed man has been held by US police for over 18 months    without criminal charges.  <\/p>\n<p>    The suspect's lawyer has argued that he should not have to hand    over his passwords due to the Fifth Amendment, which protects    US citizens from incriminating themselves.  <\/p>\n<p>    However, a US judge disagrees.  <\/p>\n<p>    According to court    documents released this week (.PDF) by the US Third Circuit    Court of Appeals, during an investigation relating to child    pornography on the Internet, a raid in 2015 on the man's home    resulted in the seizure of an Apple iPhone 5S and an Apple Mac    Pro together with two attached Western Digital external hard    drives.  <\/p>\n<p>    All of the devices were protected with encryption software, of    which law enforcement was originally unable to break.  <\/p>\n<p>    While the suspect gave police a password for the iPhone, he    refused to decrypt the Mac Pro and the hard drives.  <\/p>\n<p>    Forensic investigators were able to discover the password for    the Mac which contained images of a \"pubescent girl in a    sexually provocative position,\" -- including sexual content    relating to Doe's four and six-year-old nieces.  <\/p>\n<p>    According to prosecutors, browser logs that revealed John Doe    had visited websites related to child pornography were also    found.  <\/p>\n<p>    The forensic team was also able to learn that the man had    downloaded thousands of files believed to be child porn.    Although the team says these files have been downloaded due to    their hash values, the files themselves were not stored on the    MacBook Pro -- but rather, the inaccessible hard drives.  <\/p>\n<p>    The suspect's sister also gave testimony to police, alleging    that Doe had shown her \"hundreds\" of child pornographic images    from the hard drives, alongside \"videos of children who were    nude and engaged in sex acts with other children.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    However, law enforcement failed to access the external hard    drives. Doe refused to hand over the passwords required to    decrypt the drives -- at one point claiming to have forgotten    them -- and so the court found him in contempt in 2015 for    refusing to comply and \"produce several seized devices in a    fully unencrypted state.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    The man has remained behind bars ever since, which currently    stands at over 18 months.  <\/p>\n<p>    Doe originally filed with the US Magistrate Judge to quash the    order, arguing that decrypting the devices would violate his    Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. This motion    was denied, leading to the fresh appeal.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The Magistrate Judge acknowledged Doe's Fifth Amendment    objection but held that, because the Government possessed Doe's    devices and knew that their contents included child    pornography, the act of decrypting the devices would not be    testimonial for purposes of the Fifth Amendment privilege    against self-incrimination,\" the court documents read.  <\/p>\n<p>    Doe now argues that he should not be held in contempt as the    District Court also lacks the jurisdiction to issue the order    to decrypt his devices.  <\/p>\n<p>    Speaking to the    BBC, Keith Donoghue, a federal defender representing John    Doe said the rejected appeal is \"disappointing.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    \"[We are] studying the decision to determine what further    review it may be appropriate to seek,\" Donoghue said. \"The fact    remains that the government has not brought charges and our    client has now been in custody for nearly 18 months based on    his assertion of his constitutional right against    self-incrimination.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has filed an amicus    brief in this case, arguing against compelling someone to    reveal their passwords. In an interview, EFF senior staff    attorney Mark Rumold     told The Register that \"any time suspects are forced to    disclose the contents of their mind, that's enough to trigger    the Fifth Amendment, end of story.\"  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Here is the original post:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.zdnet.com\/article\/us-man-looses-appeal-in-child-porn-encrypted-device-case\/\" title=\"US man loses appeal in child porn encrypted device legal case ... - ZDNet\">US man loses appeal in child porn encrypted device legal case ... - ZDNet<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Malwarebytes A US man has lost an appeal over his refusal to decrypt hard drives in a case law enforcement says involves child pornography. The unnamed man has been held by US police for over 18 months without criminal charges. The suspect's lawyer has argued that he should not have to hand over his passwords due to the Fifth Amendment, which protects US citizens from incriminating themselves.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fifth-amendment\/us-man-loses-appeal-in-child-porn-encrypted-device-legal-case-zdnet\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94880],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-184529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fifth-amendment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184529"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=184529"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184529\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=184529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=184529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=184529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}