{"id":184427,"date":"2017-03-21T12:26:59","date_gmt":"2017-03-21T16:26:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/casino-gambling-bill-faces-tough-test-again-the-union-leader\/"},"modified":"2017-03-21T12:26:59","modified_gmt":"2017-03-21T16:26:59","slug":"casino-gambling-bill-faces-tough-test-again-the-union-leader","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/gambling\/casino-gambling-bill-faces-tough-test-again-the-union-leader\/","title":{"rendered":"Casino gambling bill faces tough test &#8212; again &#8211; The Union Leader"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>        CONCORD  After 18 years of trying, Manchester Sen. Lou    DAllesandro is at it again, with another attempt to authorize    casino gambling at two locations in New Hampshire.  <\/p>\n<p>    Senate Bill 242 cleared the Senate during    last Thursdays marathon session in a bipartisan 13-10 vote,    and now needs to clear the five-member Senate Finance Committee    today in order to proceed to the House.  <\/p>\n<p>    Its prospects are uncertain, since three of the six senators    on the Finance Committee voted against the gambling bill on the    floor of the Senate. But that doesnt dissuade the Democratic    dean of the Senate, who has fought this fight before.  <\/p>\n<p>    If we have to bring it back to the Senate floor and pass it    again, thats what well do, DAllesandro said on Monday.  <\/p>\n<p>    The closest New Hampshire has ever been to legalizing casino    gambling came in 2014, when Democrats controlled the House, and    Democratic Gov. Maggie Hassan included casino revenue in her    two-year budget.  <\/p>\n<p>    Despite support from the governor and the Senate, the 2014 bill failed by one vote in the House,    173-172. If he can get his latest bill out of the Senate,    DAllesandro thinks he can make his case to the lower chamber.  <\/p>\n<p>    I have reason to believe that if I can talk to them, and Ill    go to them one on one, we have a good chance, he said. There    are no big outside lobbyists involved now. We are talking about    something thats totally New Hampshire. I have no ulterior    motive but to do what I think is in the best interest of the    state.  <\/p>\n<p>    SB 242 calls for two casinos: one category one license and one    category two license. The Category 1 license costs $80 million    and allows for 80 to 160 table games and 2,000 to 3,500 slot    machines, while the Category 2 license costs $40 million and    allows for 25 to 80 table games and 750 to 1,500 slot machines.  <\/p>\n<p>    Money would go to the host communities and neighboring towns,    and the host county, and would enable the state to resume    revenue sharing with cities and towns.  <\/p>\n<p>    The bill as written prohibits the use of electronic benefit    transfer (EBT) cards at casinos, and would fund gambling    addiction recovery programs.  <\/p>\n<p>    The bill is opposed by the Attorney General and the Casino Free    NH organization, which has successfully fought off previous    efforts.  <\/p>\n<p>    The fact that Massachusetts and Maine now have operating    casinos only intensifies the urgency for New Hampshire to    follow, according to DAllesandro.  <\/p>\n<p>    While New Hampshire has done nothing, surrounding states now    have gaming entities, he said. They advertise on our TV    stations and we send buses of New Hampshire residents to those    other states to gamble. Its time for New Hampshire to do    something. No state that has done this has crumbled.  <\/p>\n<p>    Alice Chamberlain with Casino Free NH testified that the group    appreciates that SB 242 tries to address concerns raised in the    past, but they still believe the revenue is unreliable,    unpredictable and unsustainable, and that casino gambling    leads to an increase in crime and diminishes property values.  <\/p>\n<p>    The arguments on both sides are well-worn by now, but each new    Legislature brings a new opportunity for DAllesandro to pursue    the cause that has become associated with his lengthy tenure at    the State House.  <\/p>\n<p>    New Hampshire started the first state lottery, and has a long    history of gaming going back to horse races at Rockingham Park    and dog races in Seabrook, says DAllesandro, who points to    poll after poll that show widespread support for casino    gambling in New Hampshire.  <\/p>\n<p>    How can 424 people in the Legislature deny the public what it    wants, and deny it repeatedly? he said.  <\/p>\n<p>    During the campaign, Gov. Chris Sununu said he was open to the    idea of casino gambling, but has not staked out a clear    position one way or the other.  <\/p>\n<p>    I have talked with the governor about it, said DAllesandro.    Hes not opposed to it, but he wants to see it, so well let    him see it.  <\/p>\n<p>    The House has a gambling bill of its own, HB 560, which would authorize Keno at    locations licensed by the state lottery commission.  <\/p>\n<p>    That bill passed the House on March 9 and is headed for    hearings in the Senate Ways and Means Committee on Wednesday.  <\/p>\n<p>    Another gambling bill, HB 562, which would allow video gambling,    has been retained by the House Ways and Means Committee for    further study.  <\/p>\n<p>    <a href=\"mailto:dsolomon@unionleader.com\">dsolomon@unionleader.com<\/a><\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Original post:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.unionleader.com\/state-government\/Casino-gambling-bill-faces-tough-test-again-03212017\" title=\"Casino gambling bill faces tough test -- again - The Union Leader\">Casino gambling bill faces tough test -- again - The Union Leader<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> CONCORD After 18 years of trying, Manchester Sen. Lou DAllesandro is at it again, with another attempt to authorize casino gambling at two locations in New Hampshire <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/gambling\/casino-gambling-bill-faces-tough-test-again-the-union-leader\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187831],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-184427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gambling"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184427"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=184427"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184427\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=184427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=184427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=184427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}