{"id":184396,"date":"2017-03-21T12:21:04","date_gmt":"2017-03-21T16:21:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/the-debt-ceiling-will-come-back-to-bite-trump-realclearworld\/"},"modified":"2017-03-21T12:21:04","modified_gmt":"2017-03-21T16:21:04","slug":"the-debt-ceiling-will-come-back-to-bite-trump-realclearworld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fiscal-freedom\/the-debt-ceiling-will-come-back-to-bite-trump-realclearworld\/","title":{"rendered":"The Debt Ceiling Will Come Back to Bite Trump &#8211; RealClearWorld"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      This piece was created in collaboration with Chatham      House.Marianne Schneider-Petsinger is the U.S.      geoeconomics fellow at Chatham House's U.S. and the Americas      Programme. The views expressed are the author's own.    <\/p>\n<p>      Raising the federal governments borrowing limit will      not cause much drama this time around. But the next battles      are already brewing.    <\/p>\n<p>    The debt ceiling is back. As of March 16, the U.S. Treasury has    reached its legal borrowing limit; the most recent suspension    of the debt ceiling has expired. Less than two months into    Trumps presidency, addressing the debt limit is an early test    of his ability to get a fiscal deal with the    Republican-controlled Congress. However, unlike in 2011 and    2013, when political brinkmanship between Democrats and    Republicans led to fears of default, reaching a debt ceiling    agreement will be easier -- at least for now.  <\/p>\n<p>    Initial signs from the Trump administration show that they are    not willing to play with fire on the debt ceiling. Treasury    Secretary Steven Mnuchin stressed during his confirmation    hearing and in a recent letter to Congress that honoring the    U.S. debt is a critical commitment and urged lawmakers to    raise the debt limit     at the first opportunity. Mick Mulvaney, the director of    the Office of Management and Budget, holds a different    philosophy but has sounded less dogmatic since joining the    Trump administration. Though he is considered a fiscal hawk and    never voted to raise the debt ceiling when he served in    Congress, Mulvaney said during his recent confirmation hearing    that he would not recommend President Trump negotiate    or govern by crisis.  <\/p>\n<p>    In addition, although Republicans wont abandon fiscal    conservatism, they will be reluctant to prompt a showdown in    the first year of Trumps presidency. While in the past    Republicans have often only agreed to raise the debt ceiling in    return for spending cuts, this time around they might not    insist on this. Many trust that Trumps economic policies will    lead to economic growth of 3-4 percent, and they see this as    the best chance of balancing the budget and bringing the debt    trajectory under control.  <\/p>\n<p>    Extraordinary measures that the treasury secretary can take,    such as temporarily suspending payments to federal retirement    funds, should buy enough time for policymakers to agree to    raise the ceiling before fall -- when default becomes imminent    according to the     Congressional Budget Office.  <\/p>\n<p>    But that doesnt mean this issue is going away for Trump -- a    battle is looming for the next time the debt ceiling comes    around. By then, it will be clear that Trumps unrealistic    growth expectations, coupled with plans for tax cuts and more    infrastructure and defense spending, will actually balloon the    deficit and debt. In that scenario, the fiscal hawks in the    Republican Party will not stand by silently. The House Freedom    Caucus, a group of about 30-40 fiscally conservative    representatives, has enough voting strength to deny a House    majority based on party lines for raising the debt limit.  <\/p>\n<p>    This internal fight might force Trump to cut back on some of    his spending initiatives. Also, while he has so far insisted    that he does not want to cut Social Security and Medicare, he    might have to reform them down the road in order to stave off    an intraparty clash. Without addressing the two biggest sources    of government spending, another debt ceiling standoff is    brewing -- with all the attendant consequences for the U.S. and    global economies.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>View original post here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.realclearworld.com\/articles\/2017\/03\/21\/the_debt_ceiling_will_come_back_to_bite_trump_112259.html\" title=\"The Debt Ceiling Will Come Back to Bite Trump - RealClearWorld\">The Debt Ceiling Will Come Back to Bite Trump - RealClearWorld<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> This piece was created in collaboration with Chatham House.Marianne Schneider-Petsinger is the U.S. geoeconomics fellow at Chatham House's U.S <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fiscal-freedom\/the-debt-ceiling-will-come-back-to-bite-trump-realclearworld\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187823],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-184396","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fiscal-freedom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184396"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=184396"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184396\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=184396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=184396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=184396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}