{"id":183915,"date":"2017-03-19T16:23:36","date_gmt":"2017-03-19T20:23:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/linda-sarsour-doesnt-need-to-make-zionist-women-feel-comfortable-haaretz\/"},"modified":"2017-03-19T16:23:36","modified_gmt":"2017-03-19T20:23:36","slug":"linda-sarsour-doesnt-need-to-make-zionist-women-feel-comfortable-haaretz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/zeitgeist-movement\/linda-sarsour-doesnt-need-to-make-zionist-women-feel-comfortable-haaretz\/","title":{"rendered":"Linda Sarsour Doesn&#8217;t Need to Make Zionist Women Feel Comfortable &#8211; Haaretz"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  Women who identify with Zionism are free to participate in the  feminist protest movement. But, rightly, it's a space in which  supporters of a Jewish ethno-nationalist state should feel  uncomfortable.<\/p>\n<p>    In a recent New York Times opedDoes Feminism have Room for    Zionists?Emily Shire, who identifies as a feminist    and a Zionist, argues that her belief in Israels right to    exist as a Jewish state should not be at odds with her    feminism. She suggests that women who sought to be included in    the International Womens Strike and in the women's protests    against the current U.S. administration more generally should    not have to face a 'critical of Israel' litmus test. She takes    issue with theStrike's platform, which specifically calls for    the decolonization of Palestine, but which doesn't mention    the myriad other injustices inflicted on women across the    world.  <\/p>\n<p>    But Shire herself brings up her own Zionism. She states her    relationship to Israel shouldnt be a factor for the women's    protest while simultaneously demanding a space for it - Zionism    being a giant, pertinent caveat. Ironically, Shire is    subjecting women active in the movement to her own litmus test.  <\/p>\n<p>    The op-ed asks the wrong question. It is not whether feminism    has room for Zionists but whether Zionism has room for equal    rights.  <\/p>\n<p>    Zionisms manifestation as a political system operating for    almost 69 years now has thus far proven it does not have that    room. The State of Israel was founded as a safe haven for Jews    and is premised on privileging Jews over all others. It is not    a country for all its citizens  over 20 percent of whom are    not Jewish at all - but for all Jewish people (and    increasingly, onlycertain    kinds of Jewsto    boot).  <\/p>\n<p>    Shire gives the impression that she hasnt sat down to consider    how Palestinian womens rights, in Israel and in the occupied    territories, are systematically affected by Israels very    raison detre. (The fact that they are also trampled within    Palestinian society does not absolve Israel of responsibility).    Instead she insists on Israels right to exist as a Jewish    state. But if you don't define what that should mean for    Palestinians, you are evading the core issue. So far, it has de    facto meant Israel has had the right to exist as a system of    supremacy of one group over another.  <\/p>\n<p>    I also support the right of Jews to self-determination. But as    a Jewish ethno-nationalist state, Israel cannot uphold equal    rights. That is a fact. So the question then, is, can a Jewish    state exist that doesnt systematically violate basic human    rights?  <\/p>\n<p>    Im not sure. Its a worthy and challenging question - one that    American and Israeli Jews were grappling with to an extent    during the period surrounding Israels establishment  but it    quickly vanished. What should a Jewish state look like? How can    it function as a democracy?  <\/p>\n<p>    This is an important debate about nationalism and civic    democracy, but it is primarily an intra-Jewish issue and has    nothing to do with the current wave of feminism in the U.S. It    is not Linda Sarsours job to make Zionist women feel more    comfortable about the contradictions they are facing. If    anything, considering Israels track record, it is up to    Zionist women to take efforts to assure non-Zionist feminists    of their commitment to equal rights.  <\/p>\n<p>    I agree that all forms of violence and oppression against women    should be called out and opposed. The International Womens    Strike platform could have mentioned all forms of oppression    against women, not just Israel. That only Israel was mentioned    is part of the zeitgeist. It cannot be seen in isolation from    the context in which Israel oversees the longest-standing    military occupation in history and is simultaneously the    largest beneficiary of U.S. foreign aid, acting with near total    impunity  and with no end in sight.  <\/p>\n<p>    As an Israeli Jew who actively opposes Israels system of rule    and supports Palestinian human rights, I may not agree with    every tactic employed by the Palestinian resistance movement.    But who am I to tell them how to resist their own oppression?    As Linda Sarsour said in her interview inThe    Nationresponding to Shires piece    feminism is a movement and BDS is a tactic. If you dont    support BDS, you can choose to not take part in it, but    proactively opposing BDS because it is an alienating tactic for    a Zionist is misguided.  <\/p>\n<p>    Shire states that she draws a \"hard line\" atRasmea    Odeh.Her argument about Odehs illegitimacy as a    convicted terrorist is highly problematic. It not only    overlooks the role of Israels military courts as judge, jury    and executioner of the stateless Palestinians tried in them,    but also the fact that Israelis in the military and the    government themselves engage in acts of terror - and have never    been tried. Israel's own founders engaged in acts of Zionist    terror against British and Arab targets and then went on to    become prime ministers. While I dont think Odeh is the best    choice as the Strike's poster woman, calling her out without    holding Israelis to the same standard is one-sided.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the age of Trump, in which the current feminist forces are    operating, many liberal American Jews are finding themselves    increasingly pushed into a corner, forced to choose between    their liberalism and their support for Israel; between the    motto never again to Jews and never again to anyone.  <\/p>\n<p>    Jews, of course, have the right to equality, self-determination    and dignity, like all other human beings. No one in the    feminist movement  not Rasmeah Odeh or Linda Sarsour or anyone    else  has denied this. But as long as Israel, in its current    construction, continues to be a fundamentally unprogressive    entity that is incompatible with equality, Zionists in the    feminist camp are going to continue to feel  rightly     uncomfortable.  <\/p>\n<p>    Mairav Zonszein is an independent journalist and    translator. She blogs at+972    Magazine. Follow her on Twitter: @MairavZ  <\/p>\n<p>        Want to enjoy 'Zen' reading - with no ads and just the        article? Subscribe today      <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the rest here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.haaretz.com\/opinion\/1.778207\" title=\"Linda Sarsour Doesn't Need to Make Zionist Women Feel Comfortable - Haaretz\">Linda Sarsour Doesn't Need to Make Zionist Women Feel Comfortable - Haaretz<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Women who identify with Zionism are free to participate in the feminist protest movement. But, rightly, it's a space in which supporters of a Jewish ethno-nationalist state should feel uncomfortable <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/zeitgeist-movement\/linda-sarsour-doesnt-need-to-make-zionist-women-feel-comfortable-haaretz\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187735],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-183915","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-zeitgeist-movement"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183915"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=183915"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183915\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=183915"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=183915"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=183915"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}