{"id":183700,"date":"2017-03-19T15:53:20","date_gmt":"2017-03-19T19:53:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/human-again-the-exclusively-gay-moment-in-beauty-and-the-beast-huffington-post\/"},"modified":"2017-03-19T15:53:20","modified_gmt":"2017-03-19T19:53:20","slug":"human-again-the-exclusively-gay-moment-in-beauty-and-the-beast-huffington-post","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/post-human\/human-again-the-exclusively-gay-moment-in-beauty-and-the-beast-huffington-post\/","title":{"rendered":"HUMAN AGAIN? THE EXCLUSIVELY GAY MOMENT IN BEAUTY AND THE BEAST &#8211; Huffington Post"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      How Long Must This Go On?    <\/p>\n<p>      This months news that Beauty and the Beast would      include a gay character was both surprising and exciting.      Many in the LGBTQ+ community have long been waiting for a      Someday-My-Prince(ss)-Will-Come moment.    <\/p>\n<p>      This anticipation is part of the reason that concepts like      Joey Graceffas Dont Wait video play so well with the queer community.      They tap into the desires of generations of the LGBTQ+      community to see characters like themselves find their      Happily Ever After.    <\/p>\n<p>      Apparently, the community will have to wait a bit longer for      that.    <\/p>\n<p>      Like Rachel Maddows release of Trumps tax returns this week,      the queerness of Beauty and the Beast does not live      up to the hype surrounding it. And, as I left the theater, I      realized that the defining of LeFou as gay had undermined      my experience of the movie as a whole. The movie was an      enchanting and dazzling spectacle, but due to the discussion      surrounding it, the exclusively gay moment was      underwhelming, and it distracted from the beauty of Bill      Condons creation.    <\/p>\n<p>      For those familiar with the discussion, two points will      strike you about the films queerness.    <\/p>\n<p>      If you blink, you will miss it.    <\/p>\n<p>      Second, the so-called exclusively gay moment is not      inherently gay. It consists of two men dancing together and      smiling at one another. Only under a fragile Gaston-esque      definition of masculinity does such an act even read as      queer. In fact, in some Western traditions, like      ultraorthodox Judaism, dancing with your own sex is      preferable in certain settings to dancing with members of the      opposite sex.    <\/p>\n<p>      Additionally, examining Christian traditions, you will be      hard put to find a biblical text which would condemn this      gay moment. In fact, you will find the opposite. Early      Christianity was more comfortable with displays of affection      between members of the same sex than modern Christianity.      Thus, Paul told his followers to greet one another with a      holy kiss (Rom. 16:16) and one of the disciples is depicted      as reclining against Jesus on a kline (dining couch,      John 13:23).    <\/p>\n<p>      If the movie carries nothing inherently gay or sinful,      why are people like Franklin Graham raising hullabaloo?    <\/p>\n<p>      The central issue is one of labels.    <\/p>\n<p>      Ironically, those involved with the movie seem to have missed      one of the central points of the film: the effect of labels.      The film questions the legitimacy of labels, from the opening      query, For who could learn to love a beast? to the      Princes roar, I am not a beast! It shows the      power of labels through Gastons manipulation of the      villagers to attack the castle, and it shows the problem of      labels by flipping the idea of what constitutes a beast.    <\/p>\n<p>      Unfortunately, in the discourse around the film, gay has      proven to have the same powers as beast. This point is      shown in the timing of the boycott movement: it preceded the      release of the movie. Graham posted concerning the queering      of the film two weeks prior to its release with no real idea      of the films actual content. His and others actions were      reactionary to a label. For social conservatives, in      reinterpreting LeFou as gay, the character became something      menacing. Thus, they sallied forth with their torches and      pitchforks, urged by conservative leaders to protect their      children from their unfounded fears.    <\/p>\n<p>      The labeling of LeFou also requires the LGBTQ+ community and      their allies to reasses him, and he does not fare too well      under such scrutiny.    <\/p>\n<p>      In retrospect, nothing is inherently wrong with Josh Gads      performance. The character is similar to his other well-known      characters such as Olaf in Frozen or Elder      Cunningham in The Book of Mormon, and his      performance of Beauty and the Beasts classic songs      are, at times, delightful. In many ways, his is a charming      tribute to the animated version of the character and would      have been satisfactory as such.    <\/p>\n<p>      However, rereading LeFou as gay necessarily changes his      reception. What were adorable antics in Gads asexual talking      snowman do not play quite as well when they are translated      into Disneys first gay main character. Instead, they are      transformed into gay stereotypes performed for a laugh by a      heterosexual man for a largely heterosexual audience. Despite      Condons own gayness, the queerness of LeFou does not feel      like it was written for the LGBTQ+ community. Instead, it was      encoded for a heterosexual gaze.    <\/p>\n<p>      This fact is no more apparent than in LeFous own queer      visibility. By even the most generous readings of the      performance, LeFou is in the closet. A queer character      written for a queer audience should have no need to hide his      identity. Likewise, as Condon has interpreted the character,      he plays into the tragic caricature of queer individuals      pining away after the unattainable straight object of their      affections. This idea not only recapitulates heterosexual      preconceptions of queerness but also ties into and confirms      their fears about homosexuality.    <\/p>\n<p>      Reprise: How Long Must This Go On    <\/p>\n<p>      Dont get me wrong. In a Disney-verse where the true magic      of the Magic Kingdom is how everyone is neatly cisgendered      and heteronormative (and, until recently, white), even      caricatured tokenism is welcomed as visibility. We should      celebrate the fact that the next generation has a queer      character to look to and thank those who made this possible.    <\/p>\n<p>      At the same time, the character deserves to be critiqued.      What is the impact of the fact that the only character that      queer children have to look to is a character named The      Fool? What does this tell them about themselves and their      queerness?    <\/p>\n<p>      Although I adored the movie overall, part of my frustration      with it is that I had hoped for more out of Condons      exclusively gay moment. Instead, I found myself left      wondering how long the LGBTQ+ community must wait to see a      truly authentic performance of queerness by a main character      in a Disney film.    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Excerpt from:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/human-again-the-exclusively-gay-moment-in-beauty_us_58ccd706e4b0537abd9570f7\" title=\"HUMAN AGAIN? THE EXCLUSIVELY GAY MOMENT IN BEAUTY AND THE BEAST - Huffington Post\">HUMAN AGAIN? THE EXCLUSIVELY GAY MOMENT IN BEAUTY AND THE BEAST - Huffington Post<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> How Long Must This Go On?  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/post-human\/human-again-the-exclusively-gay-moment-in-beauty-and-the-beast-huffington-post\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-183700","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-post-human"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183700"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=183700"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183700\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=183700"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=183700"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=183700"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}