{"id":183403,"date":"2017-03-17T07:04:21","date_gmt":"2017-03-17T11:04:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/help-we-have-fallen-and-cant-escape-the-current-age-of-anger-city-watch\/"},"modified":"2017-03-17T07:04:21","modified_gmt":"2017-03-17T11:04:21","slug":"help-we-have-fallen-and-cant-escape-the-current-age-of-anger-city-watch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/nihilism\/help-we-have-fallen-and-cant-escape-the-current-age-of-anger-city-watch\/","title":{"rendered":"Help! We have Fallen and Can&#8217;t Escape the Current Age of Anger! &#8211; City Watch"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The Dark Side of Globalization-When I was a    gloomy 16-year-old grasping to find some meaning in the world,    my father gave me a tattered copy of social philosopher Michael    Novaks The Experience of Nothingness.    Seriously.  <\/p>\n<p>    There have been times over the past few decades when Ive    considered this gift a few yards short of insensitive and    maybe even borderline teenager abuse. But Im quite certain    Dads intentions were no more malicious then than when he took    me to see Annie Hall when I was 11.  <\/p>\n<p>    The essence of Novaks argument -- and to some extent Woody    Allens classic 1977 rom com -- is that individuals can achieve    some semblance of wisdom if they stop believing in culturally    sanctioned sentimental pablum about life (and love) and embrace    the essentially tragic nature of human existence.  <\/p>\n<p>    In my dads defense, Novaks 1970 book was in no way a    prescription for fatalism. Rather, it was an exhortation to    find enlightenment on the other side of disillusionment.    Accepting lifes despair and emptiness, Novak argued, was a    prerequisite for becoming a liberated and fully conscious human    being.  <\/p>\n<p>    Novak knew that what he was prescribing was no easy task.    Because it lies so near to madness, he wrote, the experience    of nothingness is a dangerous, possibly destructive    experience. Having no recourse to the comfort of broadly    embraced cultural symbols and benchmarks requires inordinate    doses of honesty, courage, and ethical self-reflection.  <\/p>\n<p>    Novaks brand of transcendent nihilism was itself a response to    a cultural breakdown caused by the rapid social change of the    late 1960s. Neither nostalgic for tradition nor putting full    stock in the coming of the Age of Aquarius, Novaks push to    accept the void was more a do-it-yourself guide to living in    the void than it was a viable call to collective action.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ive been thinking a lot about nihilism lately, both because    Novak passed away in February and also because I just finished    reading Indian writer Pankaj Mishras brilliant new book,    The Age of Anger: The History of the Present. Mishra    offers a sweeping, textured, unified theory of our    dysfunctional age and explains what angry Trumpites, Brexiters,    and radical Islamists all have in common: an utter fear of the    void.  <\/p>\n<p>    Eschewing facile political or religious explanations for the    rise of nihilistic social movements around the world, Mishra    points to a crisis of meaning wrought by globalization. He sees    the destruction of local, intimate, long-rooted systems of    meaning as the opening of a spiritual Pandoras box within    which lies infinite doubt and disillusion. Mishra sees these    negative solidarity movements as the psychically    disenfranchised targeting what they see as venal, callous and    mendacious elites.  <\/p>\n<p>    Brexiters railed against liberal cosmopolitan technocrats, as    did Trumps white nationalists. Radical Islamists loathe the    hedonism and rootlessness of wealthy Muslims whove surrendered    to Western consumer society. Rather than advocate for an agenda    that would provide them tangible returns, they all cling to    nostalgia for simpler times and rally around their hatred for    those they see as the winners in a new world order.  <\/p>\n<p>    In Mishras view, this new world order isnt simply neoliberal    capitalism allowing money, goods, and services to flow    unimpeded across the globe. Its also the attendant ideal of    liberal cosmopolitanism first advocated in the 18th century by    Enlightenment thinkers like Montesquieu, Adam Smith, Voltaire,    and Kant. Its the belief in a universal commercial society    made up of self-interested, rational individuals who seek    fulfillment.  <\/p>\n<p>    Theoretically, modern global capitalism liberates individuals    from the constraints of tradition, and encourages them to move    about freely, deploy their skills, and fulfill their dreams.    But the burdens of individualism and mobility can be as    difficult to carry for those whove succeeded in fulfilling    that modern vision as for those who cannot. A decade ago,    one study foundthat a    disproportionate number of Muslim militants have engineering    degrees, a prestigious vocation in the developing world. So,    while accepting the conventions of traditional society may    leave a person feeling as if he or she were less than an    individual, rejecting those conventions, in Mishras words, is    to assume an intolerable burden of freedom in often    fundamentally discouraging conditions.  <\/p>\n<p>    What concerns Mishra most is that when personal freedom and    free enterprise are conflated, the ambitions released by the    spread of individualism overwhelm the capacity of existing    institutions to satisfy them. There are simply not enough    opportunities to absorb the myriad desires of billions of    single-minded young people. As Mishra sees it, todays    nihilistic politics are themselves a product of the sense of    nothingness felt by growing numbers of uprooted outsiders    whove failed to find their place in the commercial metropolis.    A moral and spiritual vacuum, he writes, is yet again filled    up with anarchic expressions of individuality, and mad quests    for substitute religions and modes of transcendence.  <\/p>\n<p>    Despite his call to harness the experience of nothingness,    Michael Novak duly warned of its dangers and potential for    destructiveness. Unfortunately, his exhortation to lean in and    embrace the void strikes me as about as helpful to frustrated    millennials as it was to me when I was an angst-ridden    teenager. The answer to todays nihilistic political movements    clearly isnt more hyper individualism. Nor is a violent return    to a traditional past realistic. No one knows how to escape    from our current global age of anger. But I suspect that    whatever answer there might be will first require us Western    liberals to admit that we have finally reached the limits of    the Enlightenments cult of secular individualism.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    (Gregory Rodriguez is publisher of Zcalo Public    Square where this column was first posted     and editorial director at the Berggruen Institute.    Prepped for CityWatch by Linda Abrams.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Continue reading here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.citywatchla.com\/index.php\/important-reads\/12810-help-we-have-fallen-and-can-t-escape-the-current-age-of-anger\" title=\"Help! We have Fallen and Can't Escape the Current Age of Anger! - City Watch\">Help! We have Fallen and Can't Escape the Current Age of Anger! - City Watch<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The Dark Side of Globalization-When I was a gloomy 16-year-old grasping to find some meaning in the world, my father gave me a tattered copy of social philosopher Michael Novaks The Experience of Nothingness.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/nihilism\/help-we-have-fallen-and-cant-escape-the-current-age-of-anger-city-watch\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187716],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-183403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nihilism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183403"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=183403"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183403\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=183403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=183403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=183403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}