{"id":183355,"date":"2017-03-17T06:55:31","date_gmt":"2017-03-17T10:55:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/police-and-second-amendment-groups-debate-open-carry-bill-wnpr-news\/"},"modified":"2017-03-17T06:55:31","modified_gmt":"2017-03-17T10:55:31","slug":"police-and-second-amendment-groups-debate-open-carry-bill-wnpr-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/police-and-second-amendment-groups-debate-open-carry-bill-wnpr-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Police And Second Amendment Groups Debate Open Carry Bill &#8211; WNPR News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The General Assembly is considering a bill that would require    gun owners who openly carry a weapon to produce their gun    permit if asked by law enforcement. Changes to the proposed    language in the bill are causing some contention among members    of the Judiciary Committee, which held a public hearing on the    legislation Wednesday.  <\/p>\n<p>    The original language of House Bill 6200 stated that police    could only request to see the permit if there was reasonable    cause that a crime had been committed. The Judiciary    Committees version of the bill removes that clause, meaning if    a person carries a pistol or revolver in plain sight and a    police officer asks for his or her permit, they would be    obliged to comply, whether there is reasonable cause or not.  <\/p>\n<p>    Several committee members were concerned by the removal of    reasonable suspicion from the bill.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"This committee hears a lot of testimony on a lot of issues    making sure that our citizens of all different types are not    discriminated against,\" said Republican state Representative    Christie Carpino, \"and I have a real fear that if [House Bill]    6200 passes, we're gonna deal with that.  <\/p>\n<p>    Connecticut Chief State's Attorney Kevin Kane testified that    the draft language seems reasonable and legal.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The problem is difficult situations that the police are    confronted in. To resolve it, all they have to do is say 'May I    see the permit?' And just the mere showing of the permit    doesn't seem to be that intrusive,\" said Kane. \"I think a fair    balance is to require people to show [the open carry gun    permit] if asked.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Other lawmakers on the committee worried that the proposal    would make it easier for police to unfairly target minority gun    owners. The bill is supported by the Connecticut Police Chief's    Association, while Second Amendment groups like the Connecticut    Citizens Defense League say it violates the constitution.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to read the rest:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/wnpr.org\/post\/police-and-second-amendment-groups-debate-open-carry-bill\" title=\"Police And Second Amendment Groups Debate Open Carry Bill - WNPR News\">Police And Second Amendment Groups Debate Open Carry Bill - WNPR News<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The General Assembly is considering a bill that would require gun owners who openly carry a weapon to produce their gun permit if asked by law enforcement. Changes to the proposed language in the bill are causing some contention among members of the Judiciary Committee, which held a public hearing on the legislation Wednesday. The original language of House Bill 6200 stated that police could only request to see the permit if there was reasonable cause that a crime had been committed <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/police-and-second-amendment-groups-debate-open-carry-bill-wnpr-news\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[193621],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-183355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-second-amendment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183355"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=183355"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183355\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=183355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=183355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=183355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}