Posthumanists and perhaps especially transhumanists tend to downplay the value conflicts that are likely to emerge in the wake of a rapidly changing technoscientific landscape. What follows are six questions and scenarios that are designed to focus thinking by drawing together several tendencies that are not normally related to each other but which nevertheless provide the basis for future value conflicts. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Steve Fuller is Auguste Comte Professor of Social Epistemology in the Department of Sociology at the University of Warwick, UK. Originally trained in history and philosophy of science, Fuller is best known for his foundational work in the field of social epistemology, which is concerned with the normative grounds of organized inquiry. He has most recently authored (with Veronika Lipinska) The Proactionary Imperative: A Foundation for Transhumanism (2013). <\/p>\n
Next entry: Andrew Ferguson on Predictive Policing <\/p>\n
Previous entry: Will AI make us immortal? <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Go here to read the rest: Posthumanists and perhaps especially transhumanists tend to downplay the value conflicts that are likely to emerge in the wake of a rapidly changing technoscientific landscape. What follows are six questions and scenarios that are designed to focus thinking by drawing together several tendencies that are not normally related to each other but which nevertheless provide the basis for future value conflicts. Continue reading
\nValue Conflicts surrounding the Meaning of Life in the Trans\/Post\/Human Future - Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"