{"id":182763,"date":"2017-03-10T03:30:19","date_gmt":"2017-03-10T08:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/offshore-drilling-in-deep-trouble-as-oil-dives-lower-seeking-alpha\/"},"modified":"2017-03-10T03:30:19","modified_gmt":"2017-03-10T08:30:19","slug":"offshore-drilling-in-deep-trouble-as-oil-dives-lower-seeking-alpha","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/offshore\/offshore-drilling-in-deep-trouble-as-oil-dives-lower-seeking-alpha\/","title":{"rendered":"Offshore Drilling In Deep Trouble As Oil Dives Lower &#8211; Seeking Alpha"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    This is a traditional article dedicated to results of the    earnings season for offshore drillers. Here, we will discuss    the situation in the oil market, key trends in the offshore    drilling industry and individual offshore drillers whose stocks    trade at major U.S. stock exchanges.  <\/p>\n<p>    Oil  <\/p>\n<p>    Back on February 22, I     wrote that OPEC had little time to push Brent oil    (NYSEARCA:BNO) over $57.50    before the inevitable downside correction. The rationale for    this was simple - there were too many long speculative bets in    oil without a corresponding increase in oil prices. Recent    inventory data was the last straw that broke the camel's back,    and both Brent and WTI (NYSEARCA:USO) experienced big    sell-offs.  <\/p>\n<p>    This move cemented $57.50 for Brent and $55 for WTI as key    resistance levels. Should prices come back to these levels, you    can expect increased selling due to profit taking, hedging of    outright shorting. Oil will need a significant fundamental    catalyst to break through this resistance. Long bets by    speculators proved insufficient to push oil above the major    resistance line.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is very bad news for all offshore drilling companies.    Previous oil price levels were not good enough to increase    contracting activity as highlighted by earnings and fleet    status reports. The new downside move means that oil will spend    at least some more time under $57.50. Also, such fast moves are    negative for oil producers' confidence in price stability.    Unless oil majors become confident that prices will stay at $55    - $60 (at minimum!) per barrel, all incremental money will go    to short-cycle projects like shale.  <\/p>\n<p>    The move is also bad for the OPEC deal. Compliance to the deal    heavily depends on the cartel's ability to sustain prices.    Should prices go lower, participants will realize that they    have done everything wrong - provided a lifeline for struggling    U.S. shale producers, lost market share and did not get better    prices.  <\/p>\n<p>    Some observers expect that OPEC will be able to negotiate an    even bigger cut if they fail to improve the pricing    environment, but I expect the exact opposite. If OPEC deal    fails to improve prices and the cartel finds itself selling    less oil at the very same prices that were before the deal, the    deal will fall apart. There will be no reason to subsidize U.S.    shale and other producers at the expense of OPEC countries.  <\/p>\n<p>    Oil is oil, so there's a lot of volatility ahead. The key    takeaway for offshore drilling industry is that OPEC deal was    no silver bullet and the industry will have to wait even more    for recovery.  <\/p>\n<p>    Key highlights from the earnings season  <\/p>\n<p>    Long-term contracts at rock-bottom rates started to    emerge. Examples include     Noble Corp.'s (NYSE:NE) and     Ensco's (NYSE:ESV) contracts with Saudi Aramco. Judging    by drillers' comments during conference calls, the industry    expects there's more to come. While contracts are important to    provide financial visibility in the future, they tie up the    fleet at rates that contribute nothing or next-to-nothing to    the bottom line.  <\/p>\n<p>    There is no mass scrapping. The chart from recent    Atwood Oceanics (NYSE:ATW) presentation highlights that    pace of scrapping increased, but not dramatically:  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Most companies continue to clutch at straws and hang on to    their rigs as long as they can. Another problem with scrapping    rigs is the accompanying impairment on the balance sheet -    drillers don't want to scare investors (and potentially violate    covenants!) with real numbers. Ocean Rig (NASDAQ:ORIG), which is preparing for    restructuring, showed how hard can it get by     writing off 60% of value of its modern (!) fleet.  <\/p>\n<p>    Most management teams portrayed a better future, but they    had no facts to back up their optimism. More calls, more    talks, more everything with clients - that's how most drillers    described the situation after the OPEC\/non-OPEC deal. We have    heard this before. You can check     my article on the results of the Q3 2016 earnings season,    where I highlighted that drillers mentioned increased customer    inquiries. In my view, words mean nothing until we see tangible    evidence.  <\/p>\n<p>    Restructuring talks proved to be extremely    complicated. Suddenly, Seadrill Partners (NYSE:SDLP) turned out to be not immune    to Seadrill (NYSE:SDRL) restructuring, presenting a    wonderful     short opportunity. Seadrill itself spent a whole year to    come up with a     poor proposal which was based on unrealistic expectations.    There's little surprise that the company still has to work on a    viable deal and Chapter 11 is already in sight. Pacific    Drilling and Ocean Rig restructuring talks also continue. Faced    with unprecedented downturn, creditors try to find a scheme    that will save their money, but it's not easy (or even    possible) given the current market situation.  <\/p>\n<p>    Floaters remain dead money. Oil price is not high    enough to improve demand for floaters, period. It's safe to say    that you can forget about any material improvements in the    segment with a sub-$55 oil.  <\/p>\n<p>    Jack-ups are better, but rates are low. Jack-ups are    getting some work, but the jack-up overcapacity is so huge that    dayrates are glued to the very bottom. I see no catalysts that    can push rates from the bottom in the near term.  <\/p>\n<p>    Oil majors have already chosen their strategy for    2017. They will preserve their balance sheets and allocate    money to shale. The wild card was that oil breaks through    $57.50 with a vengeance, continuing the post-OPEC deal upside,    but this did not happen. While this is early in the year, I    already expect that any improvements are postponed to 2018. The    reason for this is that oil producers need stable prices at    higher levels to increase their offshore exposure. \"Stable\"    means that prices spend months above $57.50 or even $60, and we    are not even there yet.  <\/p>\n<p>    Let's now turn to individual names.  <\/p>\n<p>    Atwood Oceanics  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    While Atwood Oceanics does not have immediate cash problems,    especially after     equity issue at the beginning of the year, the company's    backlog remains a big problem. Atwood's shares have already    corrected significantly from the $14 level, but more downside    may follow if oil prices fail to rebound swiftly. I continue to    believe that the situation remains dangerous for the company.  <\/p>\n<p>    Diamond Offshore Drilling (NYSE:DO)  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Shares of Diamond Offshore Drilling are close to the key    support level. As I wrote in the comments section of my        previous article on the company, I believe that its shares    may be an interesting bet here if the stock breaches the    support to the downside and then immediately returns above $15.    If you are more optimistic than me on oil prices, Diamond    Offshore Drilling's current level may be suitable for you.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ensco  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    The $12 level proved to be a wall for Ensco's shares, and now    they are correcting together with oil prices. Ensco is    definitely part of the survivor group, but current momentum    looks strong and the stock needs to stabilize first before any    upside is possible.  <\/p>\n<p>    Noble Corp.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Troubled by the usual problem - lack of specific catalysts -    Noble Corp. shares are slowly gravitating towards November    lows. I expect a wide range trading for Noble Corp. stock and I    believe that it may be attractive for a range play when the low    end of the range is established. Judging by what we see on the    fundamental (no improvement in the market situation) and the    technical (sell-off across all offshore drillers, current    support does not look strong) fronts, entering at $6 may be    premature.  <\/p>\n<p>    North Atlantic Drilling (NYSE:NADL)  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Avoid North Atlantic Drilling. The probability of Seadrill    restructuring being beneficial for North Atlantic Drilling is    close to zero.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ocean Rig  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Avoid Ocean Rig. After the recent write-off, shareholder equity    became negative which highlights that there is no value left in    common shares and the company knows it.  <\/p>\n<p>    Pacific Drilling (NYSE:PACD)  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Avoid Pacific Drilling. Market for floaters is awful and the    debt is huge. Creditors will need to take significant haircuts    to make the company a viable enterprise again, which means that    common shareholders stand to receive nothing in the upcoming    restructuring.  <\/p>\n<p>    Rowan (NYSE:RDC)  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Rowan continues correction along with other offshore drilling    names. This is one of the best companies in the industry that    receives little interest from retail investors compared to    battleground stocks like Seadrill. The next support level for    Rowan is at $15, it will be interesting to see whether the    stock will be able to hold at this level. While the company    right now is hardly a momentum play, it should be closely    watched for buying opportunities.  <\/p>\n<p>    Transocean (NYSE:RIG)  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    I believe that Transocean was a bit overhyped following the    OPEC\/non-OPEC deal, so correction was almost inevitable. The    company has a whole fleet of stacked rigs, and I believe that    many of them won't work again. I see Transocean as a survivor    and I believe that it may present a buying opportunity after    the current sell-off.  <\/p>\n<p>    Seadrill  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Seadrill is only good for daytrading now. The Chapter 11    possibility is real. Should the company file for bankruptcy,    shareholders will be lucky to get anything at all. Unless you    are a real gambler, you'd be better off watching Seadrill from    the sidelines.  <\/p>\n<p>    Seadrill Partners  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    The easy short is over. At the same time, uncertainty will lead    to increased volatility in the coming days and weeks. Those    willing to grab Seadrill Partners units after the big sell-off    should keep in mind that the company may end up being part of    Seadrill restructuring, which would be a real catastrophe for    Seadrill Partners unitholders. Risks are very significant.  <\/p>\n<p>    Bottom line  <\/p>\n<p>    I see no evidence of recovery. I believe that offshore drilling    stocks remain a vehicle for momentum plays - both long and    short. Those willing to commit to offshore drilling for the    long-term (for whatever reason) will be better off sticking to    best players and avoiding gambling with battleground stocks    like Seadrill and Ocean Rig. The industry is in bad shape and    mistakes will cost dearly for investors.  <\/p>\n<p>    Disclosure: I\/we have no positions in any stocks    mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the    next 72 hours.  <\/p>\n<p>    I wrote this article myself,    and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving    compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no    business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned    in this article.  <\/p>\n<p>    Additional disclosure: I may trade any of the    abovementioned stocks.  <\/p>\n<p>    Editor's Note: This article covers one or more stocks trading    at less than $1 per share and\/or with less than a $100 million    market cap. Please be aware of the risks associated with these    stocks.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Visit link:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/seekingalpha.com\/article\/4053842-offshore-drilling-deep-trouble-oil-dives-lower\" title=\"Offshore Drilling In Deep Trouble As Oil Dives Lower - Seeking Alpha\">Offshore Drilling In Deep Trouble As Oil Dives Lower - Seeking Alpha<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> This is a traditional article dedicated to results of the earnings season for offshore drillers. Here, we will discuss the situation in the oil market, key trends in the offshore drilling industry and individual offshore drillers whose stocks trade at major U.S <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/offshore\/offshore-drilling-in-deep-trouble-as-oil-dives-lower-seeking-alpha\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187814],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182763","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-offshore"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182763"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182763"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182763\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182763"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182763"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182763"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}