{"id":182734,"date":"2017-03-10T03:15:33","date_gmt":"2017-03-10T08:15:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/baltusrol-bunkers-on-no-7-provide-proof-of-power-game-evolution-golfweek-com\/"},"modified":"2017-03-10T03:15:33","modified_gmt":"2017-03-10T08:15:33","slug":"baltusrol-bunkers-on-no-7-provide-proof-of-power-game-evolution-golfweek-com","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/evolution\/baltusrol-bunkers-on-no-7-provide-proof-of-power-game-evolution-golfweek-com\/","title":{"rendered":"Baltusrol bunkers on No. 7 provide proof of power game evolution &#8211; Golfweek.com"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Sometimes the evolution of the power game stares you right in    the face. That was the case during last summers PGA    Championship at Baltusrol Golf Clubs Lower Course in    Springfield, N.J., when players at the 505-yard, par-4 seventh    hole confronted three bunkers down the inside of the dogleg    right hole.  <\/p>\n<p>    Here was a golf course designed by A.W. Tillinghast in 1922,    toughened by Robert Trent Jones for the 1954 U.S. Open, and in    recent years revised and refined by Rees Jones over more than    two decades of enhancements.  <\/p>\n<p>    And all the evidence one needed for this lineage could be found    down the right side of the seventh in the form of three yawning    fairway bunkers, each one placed where the fairway turns by an    architect intent on challenging elite players of the era he    occupied.  <\/p>\n<p>      The bunkers on No. 7 at Baltusrol    <\/p>\n<p>    The first bunker in the serial formation of three was placed by    Tillinghast with a carry of 235 yards from the current back    tee. The second bunker, by Trent Jones, demands a carry of 265    yards to cover. The third, by Rees Jones, is 300 yards to    clear. Note two qualifying points about this example:    Tillinghasts original back tee was considerably shorter than    the one they used in the 2016 PGA, meaning that the bunker    carry in his day was closer to 200 yards. And all three bunkers    were rebuilt by Jones, though in this case left exactly in    place.  <\/p>\n<p>    We wanted to respect the tradition of architecture at    Baltusrol, said Rees Jones. We could have eliminated it or    moved it, but thought it important to recognize its place in    the evolution of the golf course.  <\/p>\n<p>    Distance evolves. Back in the 1920s, when Tillinghast and    Donald Ross were at their most productive and creative, drives    carrying 200 yards were considered prodigious. This was an era    of wooden shafts and golf balls that were often off center in    their rotation. And swings were more arms-oriented, with the    focus on hitting the center of a driver whose head was about    175 cubic centimeters  compared to todays drivers of 460    cubic centimeters.  <\/p>\n<p>    At the 1920 U.S. Open at Inverness Club in Toledo, Ohio,    long-hitting Ted Ray was considered a sensation for    occasionally being able to fly the ball more than 275 yards and    for driving the 320-yard, par-4 seventh hole twice during the    U.S. Open. He birdied it all four rounds and won the title by    one shot. He was the Jack Nicklaus of his day. Or John Daly. Or    Tiger Woods.  <\/p>\n<p>    Those pre-World War II turn points of 200 yards became 250    yards in the hands of Trent Jones  who along the way    lengthened and toughened such legendary championship layouts as    Baltusrols Lower and Oakland  <\/p>\n<p>    Hills Country Clubs South Course in Bloomfield Hills, Mich. At    the same time he pushed fairway bunkers back and clustered them    on the sides of the landing areas at lengths of 240-260 yards.  <\/p>\n<p>    Pete Dye took those decisive points and in the 1980s pushed    them back to 800 feet (267 yards). After watching Daly    annihilate the turn points at Crooked Stick Golf Club in    Carmel, Ind., during the 1991 PGA Championship, Dye went for    850 feet (283 yards). The whole industry followed, eventually    adopting 300 yards.  <\/p>\n<p>    Not that it proved enough for elite players. Today at Augusta    (Ga.) National Golf Club, the set carry point for all fairway    bunkers is 950 feet (317 yards) on level ground, adjusted a    little shorter for uphill drives and a little longer for    downhill drives.  <\/p>\n<p>    All for good measure, as we know from PGA Tour statistics. Back    in 1980, when the first comprehensive data set became    available, the mean average measured drive on the PGA Tour was    256.7 yards and the longest driver (Dan Pohl) averaged 274.3    yards. In 2016, the mean average drive was 289.8 yards and the    longest hitter (J.B. Holmes) averaged 314.5 yards.  <\/p>\n<p>    Championship setups reflect this increase  12.9 percent on    average drive and 14.7 percent on longest driver from 1980 to    2016. To take one example, the U.S. Open kept par 4s under 500    yards until 2006 at Winged Foots West Course in Mamaroneck,    N.Y., when the ninth hole measured 514 yards. Since then, par    4s exceeding 500 yards have become standard at U.S. Opens.  <\/p>\n<p>    A strong case can be made, however, that the growth of distance    and power in the game is largely confined to elite players and    that its not relevant to everyday golfers, whose skills vary    widely  if not wildly.  <\/p>\n<p>    Thats essentially the view of architect Tom Doak, whose    iconoclastic views on golf strategy and course setup the past    30 years  as both a writer and a designer  helped usher in a    new, alternative perspective that emphasizes the ground game    and shot-making, not sheer power.  <\/p>\n<p>    Turn points are the most overrated discussion in golf course    design, Doak said. We took down the poles when we were doing    Pacific Dunes (at Bandon Dunes Golf Resort in Oregon). Were    not building courses for touring pros, and when you watch    people actually play golf, they are not there; they are 30    yards short or 20 yards right.  <\/p>\n<p>    Besides, as he points out, even if you could get players from    different tees to orient their drives to a common gathering    point, theyre hitting very different clubs from there to the    green. From 160 yards, its a 9-iron for a tour pro, a 5-iron    for a mid-handicapper like myself and a 3-wood that wont even    get there for the high-handicapper. So what you actually want    to do is get the short hitter well past that point, not design    from one point.  <\/p>\n<p>    Doaks point is that simply designing for distance is    self-defeating and only plays into the hands of the longest    hitters. His own preference, one shared by a growing number of    architects today, is to focus more on the short game, on angles    and on interesting greens and surrounds.  <\/p>\n<p>    Thats certainly been the case at recent U.S. Opens, such as    Merion Golf Club, Pinehurst No. 2, Chambers Bay and Oakmont.    For all the length of these courses, their main challenge has    come in the form of diverse, sometimes maddening ground    contours in and around the greens.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>The rest is here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/golfweek.com\/2017\/03\/09\/baltusrol-bunkers-on-no-7-provide-proof-of-power-game-evolution\/\" title=\"Baltusrol bunkers on No. 7 provide proof of power game evolution - Golfweek.com\">Baltusrol bunkers on No. 7 provide proof of power game evolution - Golfweek.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Sometimes the evolution of the power game stares you right in the face. That was the case during last summers PGA Championship at Baltusrol Golf Clubs Lower Course in Springfield, N.J., when players at the 505-yard, par-4 seventh hole confronted three bunkers down the inside of the dogleg right hole. Here was a golf course designed by A.W <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/evolution\/baltusrol-bunkers-on-no-7-provide-proof-of-power-game-evolution-golfweek-com\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187748],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182734","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-evolution"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182734"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182734"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182734\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182734"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182734"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182734"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}