{"id":182228,"date":"2017-03-08T13:07:21","date_gmt":"2017-03-08T18:07:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/a-french-surrealists-eclectic-remembrances-of-his-cohort-finally-in-english-hyperallergic\/"},"modified":"2017-03-08T13:07:21","modified_gmt":"2017-03-08T18:07:21","slug":"a-french-surrealists-eclectic-remembrances-of-his-cohort-finally-in-english-hyperallergic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/rationalism\/a-french-surrealists-eclectic-remembrances-of-his-cohort-finally-in-english-hyperallergic\/","title":{"rendered":"A French Surrealist&#8217;s Eclectic Remembrances of His Cohort, Finally in English &#8211; Hyperallergic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Philippe Soupault, Lost  Profiles: Memoirs of Cubism, Dada, and Surrealism  <\/p>\n<p>        Lost Profiles: Memoirs of Cubism, Dada, and    Surrealism is a diminutive, stylish book that kicks    off by appreciatively documenting a curiously seedy period of    transition within the anti-rationalist French avant-garde: from    Dada to Surrealism. Published by legendary City Lights in late    2016, this alluring collection of amiable reminiscences was    penned by co-founding Surrealist poet Philippe    Soupault (18971990) and first appeared in French in 1963    as Profils perdus. City Lights has bracketed this    English translation with an introduction by Mark Polizzotti,    the director of the publications program at the Metropolitan    Museum of Art, and an afterword by poet     Ron Padgett.  <\/p>\n<p>    Polizzottis contribution is essential, as he not only    contextualizes Soupault within the Parisian avant-garde but    corrects some dating errors of Soupaults and reverses some of    Andr Bretons bowdlerizing, revealing the essential conceptual    contribution that psychologist, philosopher, and    psychotherapist Pierre Janet    played in Soupault and Bretons budding Dada-cum-Surrealist    movement. (Breton had neglected the erudite Janet in his    accounts.) On the other hand, Polizzotti keenly reports that    Soupault tends to assign himself the starring role a bit more    than is warranted, thus advancing the thesis that every    biography is a disguised autobiography.  <\/p>\n<p>    Though essentially about his experiences as a rather blissful    young man, Soupault wrote this book of portraits at age 66,    sparing it the typical excesses of literary juvenilia. Indeed,    his generally urbane tone is neither ironic and frivolous, nor    competitive and facetious. His clipped, fluid prose avoids    academic stodginess with lan, and there is nothing insolent,    narcissistic, lecherous, or self-protective about it.  <\/p>\n<p>    The translation by poet Alan    Bernheimer has flair too, delivering Soupaults appealingly    eclectic text in delightful form to the Anglophone audience for    the first time. Soupaults sharp but sweet anecdotal memories    of fellow experimental artists and antagonists include laudable    short portraits of Guillaume Apollinaire, Marcel Proust, James    Joyce, sad surrealist Ren    Crevel, novelist Georges    Bernanos, painter     Henri Rousseau, poet     Charles Baudelaire (whom he sketches as a precursor    avant-gardist) and lesser-known poets     Pierre Reverdy and Blaise    Cendrars. Given the heroic stature of some of these    audacious subjects, within their chapters Soupault seems to    delight in making large small and small large, humanizing the    celebrated with intimate particularization and paeanizing the    obscure with encomium.  <\/p>\n<p>    With a seductive cubist cover painting by Robert    Delaunay of a scowling Soupault ignoring a quaking Eiffel    Tower, this enjoyable collection of crisp recollections    popularizes what was once essentially arcane. Like Marc Dachys    essential     Discoveries: Dada: The Revolt of Art, Soupaults    book  with its pocket size, short chapter format, and    reasonable price  makes for the perfect travel companion. Even    though the essays presume a certain level of familiarity with    the French avant-garde, they have an engaging quality that    transmits Soupaults palpable love for experimental art and for    his  quelle surprise  exclusively male subjects.    Lost Profiles offers witty and unexpurgated views of    venturesome men during a daring era, but it is in no way a    sufficiently broad-spectrum historical overview of the birth of    the avant-garde in Paris.  <\/p>\n<p>    Soupault, whose style of disaffection favored plain living and    high thinking, lived a lengthy literary life, never ceasing to    write improbable tales. Rather young during World War I when he    served in the French army, he saw the Parisian art spirit of    the times as one based in Dada iconoclastic destruction, bent    on devastating conventional systems of representation,    traditional morality, and all sorts of rational social    organization (which the Dadaists saw, in light of the war, as    depraved and crazed). This effervescent mood, which fted    scandal, was particularly incited in Paris by the arrival of    Tristan Tzara. This closed a circuit, as Dadaist Tzara had been    influenced by Parisian Cubism: borrowing and intensifying the    anti-logic of juxtaposition, condensation, and displacement    specifically from Synthetic Cubist collage. For Soupault,    Tzaras tipsy Dada showed the nonsense latent in all sense.  <\/p>\n<p>    As Soupault writes, Dada was out to destroy all the    established values, the literary practices, and the moral bias    in the interests of what Apollinaire (an outspoken and    thought-provoking defender of Cubism) called the new spirit    in art. Perhaps that is one reason that the essay Steps in the    Footsteps (Les pas dans les pas) has been moved    from the end in the French edition to open the collection in    English: It is here that Soupault recalls how he and Breton    were first affiliated through Apollinaires friendship and    encouragement as they came to know Tzara and participate in the    earliest performances of the Paris Dada movement. In 1919, with    Breton and Louis Aragon, Soupault co-founded the Dada journal        Littrature. That same year, Soupault collaborated    with Breton on     Les Champs magntiques (The Magnetic Fields), the text    of automatic writing that inspired     Andr Massons automatic drawings. Together, these works    are widely considered the foundation of the Surrealist movement    and the greatest contributions by the original Surrealist    group.  <\/p>\n<p>    Of course, Soupault had a famous falling out with Bretons    goatish brand of Surrealism (a term taken from Apollinaires    text Onirocritique that was itself snatched from    Artemidoruss    ancient Greek treatise on dream interpretation) arising from    the movements increasingly Soviet Communist ties and Bretons    self-anointment as leading arbiter. In 1927 Soupault and his    wife Marie-Louise translated William Blakes     Songs of Innocence and Experience into French, and    the following year Soupault authored a monograph on Blake,    arguing that he had anticipated the Surrealist movement.  <\/p>\n<p>    After putting down this fulfilling read, a few nasty thoughts    kept haunting me. Soupaults anti-rational Dada-Surrealism was    largely the art of generalizing where the particular was in    play. Dada-Surrealism rejected the tight correlation between    words and meaning, which perhaps sounds familiar in our era of    Trump post-factuality: slippery conceptual bullshit moves that    exploit Soupault-type forms of verbal extrapolation in the    interests of far-right political manipulations. It seems to me    that what Soupault wanted to show us was that verbal    impossibilities could produce astonishing transgressions that    liberate the mind from conservative militaristic convention     something quite the opposite of spectacular post-factual    speculative conspiracy theories (think Pizzagate)    that support Trump by liberating thought from a concern for    credibility.  <\/p>\n<p>    In that sense (and that one alone), Soupaults avant-gardism    helped cultivate a taste for the ambiguity of the post-truth    political economy of the alt-right, with its toxic mix of white    supremacy, misogyny, xenophobia, militarism, and oligarchic    tendencies. Indeed, hard-right Trump trolls are similar to    their Dada predecessors in that they do not recognize any    limits to truth claims. For some, merely saying things that are    not usually said openly is part of the transgressive thrill of    Trumpism. Even when Trump himself is caught in an     egregious lie, his anti-globalist, nationalist supporters    manage to believe that he is instead revealing critical truths,    and that any reporting to the contrary actually exposes the    anti-conservative bias of the perceived media and cultural    lite.  <\/p>\n<p>    Like the Dadaists, the trolling radical right has always been    acutely sensitive to the emotions of shockingly vulgar    communications whose primary goal is cognitive manipulation.    Trump panders to prejudice by liberating previously repressed    aggression, viciousness, and mockery and redirecting it at    immigrants, people of color, women, gay, lesbian, bisexual, and    transgender people. So it saddens me to say that I could not    help but notice that the alt-right trolls and the Dada-Surreal    heroes share many of the clever cognitive-dissonant techniques    in their messaging. Of course, the evil onus is on the    alt-right (already a pass term, as this groups objectives are    no longer an alternative to anything but central to sites of    forceful power). Therefore, it is important to note that    Soupault did not stop his intellectual pursuits with the    anti-rational Magnetic Fields. Following his    co-founding of Surrealism, he practiced journalism and directed    Radio    Tunis from 1937 to 1940 after he was arrested in Tunisia by    the pro-Vichy regime during WWII. After the war, he resumed his    journalistic activities, worked for UNESCO, and taught at    Swarthmore College while writing essays    and novels.  <\/p>\n<p>    The reality of Trump has now sunk in, and the sense of trauma    on the cultural left has deepened (with the stakes only likely    to get higher). As a starting point for political    activism\/artivism, perhaps artists engaged in increasingly    vehement expressions of dissent may wish to consider how best    to combat the normalization of Trumps impulsive    anti-rationalism through the refusing anti-rationalist eyes of    Soupaults disaffection, conversely tempered by his    journalistic rigor and educational commitment. This    double-bladed approach of utilizing anti-rational    (post-truth) mind games and facts-based objective accuracy    may best frustrate Trumps insatiable desire for recognition    and get under his oh-so-thin skin.  <\/p>\n<p>        Lost Profiles: Memoirs of Cubism, Dada, and    Surrealism is now available from online booksellers    and     City Lights.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See original here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/hyperallergic.com\/362955\/a-french-surrealists-eclectic-remembrances-of-his-cohort-finally-in-english\/\" title=\"A French Surrealist's Eclectic Remembrances of His Cohort, Finally in English - Hyperallergic\">A French Surrealist's Eclectic Remembrances of His Cohort, Finally in English - Hyperallergic<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Philippe Soupault, Lost Profiles: Memoirs of Cubism, Dada, and Surrealism Lost Profiles: Memoirs of Cubism, Dada, and Surrealism is a diminutive, stylish book that kicks off by appreciatively documenting a curiously seedy period of transition within the anti-rationalist French avant-garde: from Dada to Surrealism.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/rationalism\/a-french-surrealists-eclectic-remembrances-of-his-cohort-finally-in-english-hyperallergic\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187714],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-rationalism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182228"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182228"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182228\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182228"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182228"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182228"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}