{"id":181084,"date":"2017-03-04T00:43:54","date_gmt":"2017-03-04T05:43:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/skulls-found-in-china-were-part-modern-human-part-neanderthal-possibly-new-species-washington-post\/"},"modified":"2017-03-04T00:43:54","modified_gmt":"2017-03-04T05:43:54","slug":"skulls-found-in-china-were-part-modern-human-part-neanderthal-possibly-new-species-washington-post","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/post-human\/skulls-found-in-china-were-part-modern-human-part-neanderthal-possibly-new-species-washington-post\/","title":{"rendered":"Skulls found in China were part modern human, part Neanderthal; possibly new species &#8211; Washington Post"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Modern humansoutlasted theNeanderthals    byabout 40,000 years and counting. Butdont pat    yourself on the back too firmly for outliving those    troglodytes. Neanderthals crafted tools andtamed fire. They cared for their dead.    Animal hornsand blackenedfirepits encircling    the remains of a Neanderthal toddler suggest a42,000-year-old funeral rite. If a    Neanderthal indeed wore atalon necklace,as a collection of    polished eagle claws indicate, they beat us to jewelry, too.    Perhaps one of your ancient ancestorsfound the claw    necklaces sexy: Some scientists theorize humans gave    Neanderthals genital herpes andtapeworm parasites.  <\/p>\n<p>    Their proportions, however, remained distinctly Neanderthal.    Neanderthal bodies were shorter and stockier,    moreGimlison of Glointhan GigiHadid. Their skulls were built    differently, too, with a fewfeatures  like heavy brow    ridges  particularly unlike ours.  <\/p>\n<p>    Which makes a pair of newly described skulls something of a    wonder. The partial skulls have features up to this    timeunseen in the hominid fossil record, sharing both    human and Neanderthal characteristics.  <\/p>\n<p>    It is a very exciting discovery, asKaterina Harvati, an expert in Neanderthal    evolution at theUniversity of Tbingen in Germany, who    was not involved with the research, told The Washington Post.    Especially because the human fossil record from East Asia has    been not only fragmentary but also difficult to date.  <\/p>\n<p>    Excavators dug up the skull cap fragments in 2007 and 2014, in    Lingjing, located in Chinas Henan province. The diggers    discovered two partial skulls in a sitethought to be    inhabited 105,000 to 125,000 years ago, during an epoch called    the Pleistocene. The owners of the skulls were good hunters,    capable of fashioning stone blades from quartz. Ancient bones    of horses and cattle, as well as extinct woolly rhinoceros and    giant deer, were found strewn near the skull remains.  <\/p>\n<p>    Researchers from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing and    at Washington University in St. Louis described the skulls as    having a mosaic of features. Writing Thursday in the journal    Science, they noted similarities with three    groups: The brow ridges of the skulls were modest and the skull    bone mass was reduced, like features of early modern humans    living in the Old World. The skulls had abroad and flat    brainpan, like other eastern Eurasian humans from the    mid-Pleistocene epoch. Their semicircular ear canalsand    the enlarged section at the back of the skull, however, were    like a Neanderthals.  <\/p>\n<p>    Eastern Asian late archaic humans have been interpreted to    resemble their Neanderthal contemporaries to some    degree,Xiujie Wu, an author of the study at    theChinese Academy of Sciences Institute of    Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, said in a    statement. Yet it is only with the discovery of two human    crania, she said, that the nature of these eastern Eurasian    early Late Pleistocene archaic humans is becoming clear.  <\/p>\n<p>    The largebrains of these archaic humans ruledout    Homo erectusand other known hominid species, the    scientists wrote. The researchers were vague about what they    thought the species might be, describing them only as archaic    humans. ButWu toldScience Magazine that the fossils    could represent a kind of unknown or new archaic human that    survived on in East Asia to 100,000 years ago.  <\/p>\n<p>    Other experts speculated that these skull caps could represent    a little-known human relative: the mysteriousDenisovans, a species that currently exists    only as sequenced DNA taken from finger bone and a tooth found    in a Siberian cave. Thought to live some 100,000 to 50,000    years ago, the Denisovans shared genetic material with humans    as well as Neanderthals. A 2015 analysis of the specimen scraps    indicated that the Denisovans lived for some 60,000 yearsside-by-sidewith    Neanderthals and humans in Asia.  <\/p>\n<p>    (That humans interbred with Neanderthals is, of course, old    news. Many humans who have Eurasian ancestry carry bits of    Neanderthal DNA, around 2 to 5 percent of it, within their    genes. In the process of swapping DNA, Neanderthals lent us    genes forbad skin while boosting our immune responses.)  <\/p>\n<p>    The cranial remains show an intriguing combination of    Neanderthal-like as well as archaic features, Harvati said.    This would be the combination that one would expect based on    the ancient DNA analysis of Denisovans, who were closely    related to Neanderthals.  <\/p>\n<p>    The paper did not mention Denisovans, the study authors said,    because DNA extraction attempts failed to yield genetic    material.  <\/p>\n<p>    But the lack of even a nod toward the Denisovans in the new    report was a point thatPhilipp Gunz, an evolutionary anthropologist at    theMax Planck Institute in Leipzig, found surprising. The    fossils, which Gunz called remarkable, as he told The Post,    certainly look like what many paleoanthropologists (myself    included) imagine the Denisovans to look like.  <\/p>\n<p>    Time may tell  if scientists can pull off a successful    laboratory analysis.  <\/p>\n<p>    Unfortunately, however, it is not possible to infer skull    morphology from ancient DNA directly, Gunz said. I therefore    hope that future studies will be able to extract ancient DNA    from these or similar specimens.  <\/p>\n<p>    More from Morning Mix:  <\/p>\n<p>    Mexican company says its open to providing    cement to build border wall  <\/p>\n<p>        Scottish teacher told to watch The Big Bang Theory as prep    for pupils with Aspergers  <\/p>\n<p>        Subway fires back with its own study to prove its chicken is    chicken  <\/p>\n<p>        The world waits on edge as April the pregnant giraffe becomes    live-stream sensation  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the article here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/morning-mix\/wp\/2017\/03\/03\/skulls-found-in-china-were-part-modern-human-part-neanderthal-possibly-new-species\/\" title=\"Skulls found in China were part modern human, part Neanderthal; possibly new species - Washington Post\">Skulls found in China were part modern human, part Neanderthal; possibly new species - Washington Post<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Modern humansoutlasted theNeanderthals byabout 40,000 years and counting.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/post-human\/skulls-found-in-china-were-part-modern-human-part-neanderthal-possibly-new-species-washington-post\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-181084","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-post-human"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181084"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=181084"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181084\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=181084"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=181084"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=181084"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}