{"id":180999,"date":"2017-03-02T14:21:20","date_gmt":"2017-03-02T19:21:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/playing-catch-up-conde-nast-navigates-a-tricky-digital-evolution-digiday\/"},"modified":"2017-03-02T14:21:20","modified_gmt":"2017-03-02T19:21:20","slug":"playing-catch-up-conde-nast-navigates-a-tricky-digital-evolution-digiday","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/evolution\/playing-catch-up-conde-nast-navigates-a-tricky-digital-evolution-digiday\/","title":{"rendered":"Playing catch-up, Conde Nast navigates a tricky digital evolution &#8211; Digiday"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Last June,     Vanity Fair launched The Hive, its first    verticaloutside the storied magazine, with a roster of    star writers and social-first strategy. But to Mike Hogan, the    magazines digital director, the brand was significantin    another, less obvious way.  <\/p>\n<p>    To launch it all internally and have it happen on time and    without major glitches is a new experience for us, he said.  <\/p>\n<p>    If Cond Nasts glossy magazines arefirst-class, its    digital operation for years has been a distant second. With its    strength in print ads, digital wasnt a priority. Forget about    being ahead of the curve: It took years just to get magazines    their own websites; Vogue.com didnt launchin earnest    until 2010. For the most part, Cond titles treated their sites    as promotional vehicles for driving print subscriptions. It    continued this approach even as other magazine companies like    Hearst and Time Inc.were beefing up their digital    capabilities and talking ambitiously about going toe-to-toe    with digital natives like BuzzFeed and Vox Media.  <\/p>\n<p>    The lack of investment made it hard to keep what digital talent    the company had and to attract    digital ad dollars.John Wagner, group director of    published media at PHD, said that Cond Nast saw its    competition as other legacy print publishers, and it led with    print even when the advertiser was asking for digital.  <\/p>\n<p>    The company has quietly been catching up, though. In 2014 it    named its first chief digital officer, Fred Santarpia. In the    two years since, Cond Nasts digital audience grew 76 percent    while time spent on the sites has increased 132 percent, per    the company. Its a great start, he said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Pop-up on top of pop-up    Collaboration is a matter of survival for modern publishers.    Digital is a scale game,and the silos that worked fine    for print magazines would hold them back online. The companys    brands were losing ground to faster-growing, nimbler digital    pure-plays like BuzzFeed. At a point, there were as many as 15    content management systems in use, which made it hard to    distribute large volumes of editorial content to partners like    Facebook or Yahoo and sell advertising across    titles.Employeeswho moved from one brand to another    often had to be retrained in the new system.  <\/p>\n<p>    We were incredibly hard to work with, said Santarpia, who had    come from the same position at Cond Nast Entertainment, the    companys video arm. Not only were our sites incredibly slow,    but youd get pop-up on top of pop-up on top of pop-up. The    digital staff was complacent and lacking in mobile skills. I    didnt have experienced designers. I didnt have data    scientists.  <\/p>\n<p>    Other legacy publishers Time Inc. and Hearst have modernized    bypooling    editorial resources and pushing    titles to share stories. But forcing that kind of    collaboration would be tricky at Cond Nast, whose famous print    titles including Vogue, The New Yorker and Wired had long run    as staunchly independent businesses. The challenge for    Santarpia was to balance the need for efficiency without    cramping the brands individuality.  <\/p>\n<p>    Balancing scale with independence    Santarpia decided that there should be certain principles every    site would have to adhere to  there would be no more annoying    pop-up ads, for example, and sites had to load fast, a    requirement that he said led to many fights with editors on a    new product because it didnt meet a site speed.  <\/p>\n<p>      Get Digiday's top stories every morning in your email inbox.    <\/p>\n<p>    Hecentralizedfunctions like audience development,    research and social media but dedicated experts in those areas    tothe individual brands. All21 brands would be    migrated to a homegrowncontent management system called    Copilot, which would help sitespublish and innovate    faster. All in all, hes turned over 65 percent of the digital    staff.  <\/p>\n<p>    Being on a common platformmade iteasier for brands    to syndicate their articles outside the company. There were    more platforms than ever demanding publishers content, and    while it was up to each brand to decide their distributed    strategy, they would all use the same Copilot interface to plug    into Apple News, Facebook Instant Articles and Googles    Accelerated Mobile Pages. Its also made it easier for brands    to sharetools and features. A tool Vanity Fair created    that lets it A\/B test personalized article    recommendationsis now used company-wide.  <\/p>\n<p>    We wanted the individual brand strategy to choose what theyre    going to focus on, Santarpia said. Its very easy to get to    templatizing everything. Thats not who we are. We very much    value the individuality of brand voices. At the same time, he    said, scale and quality are not mutually exclusive goals.  <\/p>\n<p>    Cooperation is still largely left up to the brands themselves.    Theres no mandate that brands publish stories from sister    brands,but if they want to, Copilot is supposed to make    that easier, too.  <\/p>\n<p>    Vanity Fairs Hogan said there was concern about how the    transition to Copilot would go, but Santarpia played the    partof football coach, saying, in effect, Im not going    to mess with your content vision, Im going to provide the    support necessary to have success in digital. That was the    right answer.  <\/p>\n<p>    Beyond cutting load time and growing traffic, Copilots    benefits have differed from site to site. For GQ, Copilot made    it easy to test different content recirculation modules, said    Mike Hofman, GQs executive digital director. Changes like that    have helped increase time spent on GQ.com 117 percent year over    year.  <\/p>\n<p>    The best CMSs make everyday tasks easy and out-of-the-ordinary    ones possible, Hofman said. What you see is a lot of brands    experimenting and sharing their learnings and the actual    features themselves.  <\/p>\n<p>    Going for engagement, not clicks    The timing for these stridesis good, as advertisers    growing increasingly aware ofthe problems that a    scale-obsessed digital media model has wrought and are becoming    more interested in how sites areengaging with audiences    instead of just their sheer volume of clicks. Cond Nasts    digital revenue increased 22 percent in 2016 and now accounts    for 30 percent of total revenue, according to the company.  <\/p>\n<p>    Buyers said the company has done a lot to improve its digital    sales talent, their pitch and the products themselves. Greg    Smith, head of investment at MEC, said the company is still too    print-centric and expensive and their ideas often feel    prepackaged, but that its done a good job of wrangling the    brands so agencies can buy ads on multiple brands at once.    Their pride, sense of entitlement can be off-putting, but at    least theyre not seeing themselves as a commodity, he said.  <\/p>\n<p>    PHDs Wagner said the publisher has done well to use its    first-party data to match ad campaigns to their target    audiences, position itself against digital-only competitors and    increase its traffic without sacrificing editorial quality.  <\/p>\n<p>    Theyre definitely staying pure to who they are as a company,    Wagner said. Theyre not going down that, lets get the    click.  <\/p>\n<p>    Cond Nast needs to do more to show younger planners and buyers    that it should be thought of the same as digital-only    publishers, though, Wagner said. Having a seat at the table is    more important for them when their pure-play competition is    champing at the bit to come in every day.  <\/p>\n<p>    Going forward, the massive audience gains of the past couple of    years are expectedto taper off, and the challenges will    be for the company to find growth through personalization and    new product launches like The Hive. Later this year, the    company will also face another big taskas it migrates    itsinternational editionsto Copilot, one Santarpia    doesnt take lightly.  <\/p>\n<p>    It is exponentially harder because you have each country doing    their own thing and within each country, each brand doing its    own thing, he said. Its a couple years behind, but the good    news is, theyll benefit from the things weve learned.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See original here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/digiday.com\/media\/playing-catch-conde-nast-navigates-tricky-digital-evolution\/\" title=\"Playing catch-up, Conde Nast navigates a tricky digital evolution - Digiday\">Playing catch-up, Conde Nast navigates a tricky digital evolution - Digiday<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Last June, Vanity Fair launched The Hive, its first verticaloutside the storied magazine, with a roster of star writers and social-first strategy. But to Mike Hogan, the magazines digital director, the brand was significantin another, less obvious way. To launch it all internally and have it happen on time and without major glitches is a new experience for us, he said <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/evolution\/playing-catch-up-conde-nast-navigates-a-tricky-digital-evolution-digiday\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187748],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180999","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-evolution"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180999"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180999"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180999\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180999"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180999"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180999"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}