{"id":180980,"date":"2017-03-02T14:18:57","date_gmt":"2017-03-02T19:18:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/message-to-ministers-ai-can-transform-the-way-we-live-right-now-the-guardian\/"},"modified":"2017-03-02T14:18:57","modified_gmt":"2017-03-02T19:18:57","slug":"message-to-ministers-ai-can-transform-the-way-we-live-right-now-the-guardian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ai\/message-to-ministers-ai-can-transform-the-way-we-live-right-now-the-guardian\/","title":{"rendered":"Message to ministers: AI can transform the way we live right now &#8211; The Guardian"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  Artificial intelligence AI cant solve the Southern rail  dispute, but it can help make services run more smoothly.  Photograph: Yui Mok\/PA<\/p>\n<p>    Artificial intelligence (AI) is    likely to prove the most transformative technology of the 21st    century. Those of us who work in the field  whether in the    public or private sector  are at a frontier that is advancing    at an ever-accelerating rate. Yet my work on tech policy at the    Government Digital Service and the Home    Office often left me in despair. At a time when the    possibilities created by AI are multiplying rapidly, the    government isnt really at the races.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Governments Digital Strategy, published    yesterday, and the governments Transformation Strategy, published a couple    of weeks ago, are a case in point. It is fantastic that some    more money is going into AI and robotics research in our    universities, but treating AI as one for the future misses    the opportunities of today.  <\/p>\n<p>    At our own business, ASI, we work with organisations that are    achieving radical improvements in efficiency from relatively    simple applications of AI. A payments company that increases    fraud detection by 93%. An airline that uses machine learning    to predict demand for staff in real time, allowing them to cut    the number of standby staff required by 33%. A train    manufacturer that uses a predictive maintenance model to reduce    the number of inspections an engineer needs to perform to find    a fault in need of repair from 10,000 to two.  <\/p>\n<p>    The opportunities are here and now. But the projects that could    improve our public services and deliver value for money to the    taxpayer were nowhere to be seen in the digital strategy. And    government remains embarrassingly short of examples it can    point to. In fact, at a conference on government data last    week, the chief executive of the Civil Service resorted to    praising a list    of public toilets released as open data. We can do better    than this.  <\/p>\n<p>    The stakes are high. Even after seven years of austerity, the    public sector spends more than 40% of GDP. Yet the services    that we rely on are under ever greater pressure. The only way    the government can continue to meet the expectations that    people have of the NHS, transport or prisons is to find ways to    radically improve efficiency.  <\/p>\n<p>    The good news is that it is easy to imagine ways in which these    services could benefit from AI with relatively little    investment. It is encouraging that the justice secretary, Liz    Truss, has made digital technology so central to her prisons and courts bill. Machine learning    could play a big part in this. For example, Harvard researchers    found that cell-sharing configurations can    reduce reoffending rates by about 15% for drugs and theft    offences in French prisons. It stands to reason that choices of    cellmates matter, but even very experienced prison officers    find it difficult to balance the bewildering array of factors    that need to be taken into account. In contrast to humans,    machine learning thrives in finding the patterns that matter in    this kind of complexity. This could be done right now.  <\/p>\n<p>    Weve all read about supercomputers that are able to read a    million medical journals an hour and spot tumours more    accurately than experienced doctors. But there are significant    wins to be had from the much more prosaic matter of allocating    resources in hospitals more efficiently. Hospitals are complex    organisations dealing with unpredictable demands. Machine    learning can help them run more smoothly. Recent trials    modelled how long particular consultations and operations were    likely to take and booked theatre resources accordingly. This    hugely increased the utilisation rates of these valuable    resources, and reduced the number of over-runs caused by the    fixed-time slots.  <\/p>\n<p>    Transport is another area that could hugely benefit. AI cant    solve the Southern rail dispute, but it can help make    services run more smoothly. A recent project by ASI built an    adaptive scheduling system for a bus operator that modelled the    complex ways in which traffic flows through a city. In just a    few weeks this was able to make buses 38% more likely to show    up at the right time. Cue happier passengers, less crowded    busses, and big savings for the bus company.  <\/p>\n<p>    These are just three easy examples that could be implemented    today. There are dozens of others across the entire public    sector. But to help kickstart this kind of revolution it is    vital that ministers, civil servants and frontline    professionals become more familiar with what is possible. To    achieve this, government should create a 20m fund for    officials to bid into for projects that could demonstrate the    value of AI.  <\/p>\n<p>    Another thing the government could do to move the needle is to    provide much better access to the data that is used to train    these predictive models. Data.gov.uk has become a dumping ground for    nugatory and obscure data sets. Why not require each public    body to publish details describing its top 20 data sets that it    uses for its own operations? That might help to ferment a    proper debate about the new applications that the public might    benefit from.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the next two decades, AI will transform the way we live and    work. There is no reason whatsoever why the government    shouldnt be doing this too, but it is not. Adopting this    technology is the most plausible way of delivering the public    services people expect while making the savings we need.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2017\/mar\/02\/government-arificial-intelligence-transform-lives-efficiency\" title=\"Message to ministers: AI can transform the way we live right now - The Guardian\">Message to ministers: AI can transform the way we live right now - The Guardian<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Artificial intelligence AI cant solve the Southern rail dispute, but it can help make services run more smoothly. Photograph: Yui Mok\/PA Artificial intelligence (AI) is likely to prove the most transformative technology of the 21st century. Those of us who work in the field whether in the public or private sector are at a frontier that is advancing at an ever-accelerating rate.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ai\/message-to-ministers-ai-can-transform-the-way-we-live-right-now-the-guardian\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187743],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180980","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ai"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180980"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180980"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180980\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180980"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180980"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180980"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}