{"id":180503,"date":"2017-02-28T20:07:13","date_gmt":"2017-03-01T01:07:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/potential-dangers-and-dubious-history-of-alternative-medicine-are-often-unknown-to-its-consumers-minnpost\/"},"modified":"2017-02-28T20:07:13","modified_gmt":"2017-03-01T01:07:13","slug":"potential-dangers-and-dubious-history-of-alternative-medicine-are-often-unknown-to-its-consumers-minnpost","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/alternative-medicine\/potential-dangers-and-dubious-history-of-alternative-medicine-are-often-unknown-to-its-consumers-minnpost\/","title":{"rendered":"Potential dangers and dubious history of alternative medicine are often unknown to its consumers &#8211; MinnPost"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Anyone who uses homeopathy, acupuncture or other alternative over-the-counter    therapies  particularly if they use them on their children     needs to read two recently published articles on the topic.  <\/p>\n<p>    One of the articles, published last week in    the Boston Globes health website STAT,    takes an in-depth look at the incredibly troubling story behind    a popular homeopathic teething product that harmed hundreds of    children in the United States before it was finally pulled from    the market last fall.  <\/p>\n<p>    The U.S. Food and    Drug Administration (FDA) is currently reviewing the cases    of eight babies who died after taking the product.  <\/p>\n<p>    The other article, published earlier this year    on the Science-Based Medicine website, describes    the rise of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in both China    and Western countries. It describes how TCM began as the dream    of Chairman Mao Zedong back in the 1940s, but    is receiving a renewed global push this year by the current    Chinese government, in part to cover up major failings in    Chinas medical system, but also to protect the profits of the    countrys multibillion-dollar traditional pharmaceutical    industry.  <\/p>\n<p>    Both articles underscore how people often abandon their    skepticism and their reason to embrace bogus    alternative-medicine practices that are not only a waste of    time and money, but also potentially harmful.  <\/p>\n<p>    The articles also rip apart the prevalent David-and-Goliath    myth regarding alternative therapies: the idea that    alternative-medicine manufactures are small, noble companies    who only want to bring inexpensive, natural remedies to people    in need, but who find themselves battling the big, bad    profit-driven pharmaceutical industry.  <\/p>\n<p>    The truth is much less attractive: Alternative medicine    is now a huge profit-driven, multibillion-dollar industry, too.    And parts of it are owned by the pharmaceutical industry.  <\/p>\n<p>    For the STAT article, reporter Sheila Kaplan used the Freedom of Information Act    to seek and review FDA records for homeopathic teething pills    marketed by Hylands, a 114-year-old private,    Los-Angeles-based company that sells more homeopathic products    than any other company in the U.S.  <\/p>\n<p>    A review of those records revealed that during the 10-year    period 2006-2016 the FDA received reports of 370 children who    had experienced adverse health events after using Hylands    homeopathic teething tablets or gel. The reports are grim, says    Kaplan:  <\/p>\n<p>      Babies who were given Hylands teething products turned blue      and died. Babies had repeated seizures. Babies became      delirious. Babies were airlifted to the hospital, where      emergency room staff tried to figure out what had caused      their legs and arms to start twitching.    <\/p>\n<p>    Medical experts believe toxic levels of the teething tablets    main ingredient  the herb belladonna may have poisoned the    children.  <\/p>\n<p>    Despite those reports, it took four years until the FDA pushed    Hylands to reformulate its remedies, writes Kaplan. And even    after that reformulation, there was a steady stream of reports    of adverse events tied to Hylands homeopathic teething    products, she adds.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Hylands teething tablet saga raises issues that most    consumers of homeopathic  and other alternative    therapies  are unaware of, as Kaplan explains:  <\/p>\n<p>      Homeopathy has become a multibillion-dollar industry. Its      products are big sellers around the world, and popular with      adherents from Cher to Prince Charles. The industry also has      political clout: It has been able to exempt itself from many      rules proposed by Congress and the FDA over the years.    <\/p>\n<p>      Unlike pharmaceutical company-produced drugs, homeopathic      products dont have to prove that they are effective at      treating anything in particular before going on the market.      It is left to the FDAs drug division to determine whether      they are unsafe after they are on the market  a difficult      task since the adverse event reports are generally considered      to represent only a fraction of the actual incidents and may      lack sufficient information to allow for thorough      investigations.     <\/p>\n<p>      In some cases, parents assume that products described as      natural remedies, as is the case with Hylands tablets and      gels, could not possibly result in complications, and never      mention their use to a doctor. Without sufficient evidence of      a problem, the FDA lacks what it needs to use the enforcement      tools it does have.    <\/p>\n<p>    Hylands has stopped making its teething tablets, but only    after the FDA recommended last September that consumers    not use the product (or other homeopathic teething products)    while the agency investigates more cases of possible serious    reactions among babies.  <\/p>\n<p>    Kaplan tells a harrowing story in her article  one all users    of homeopathic medicines would be wise to read.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Science-Based Medicine article also contains background    information that is likely to surprise most consumers of    another arm of alternative medicine  TCM. Acupuncture is    by far the most popular TCM therapy, at least in Western    countries, but TCM includes many other treatments, include    herbal medicines.  <\/p>\n<p>    As Dr. David Gorski, a columnist for Science-Based    Medicine and a surgical oncologist at the Barbara Ann Karmanos    Cancer Institute, explains in the article, acupuncture has been    appropriately described as a theatrical placebo, with no    detectable difference in effect compared to sham or placebo    acupuncture.  <\/p>\n<p>    Furthermore, acupuncture is not even ancient, as Gorski    explains:  <\/p>\n<p>      The technology to make such thin needles didnt exist two      thousand years ago, [and], as recently as a century ago,      acupuncture was  brutal and primitive, using nothing like      the thin, shiny needles acupuncturists use today.    <\/p>\n<p>    But the problem with TCM, he says, is not just acupuncture,    its the whole ancient, prescientific system of medicine.  <\/p>\n<p>    Take Chinese herbal medicines. Even if the herb itself is    innocuous (and not all are), medicines imported from China have    been found to contain undeclared ingredients, including    pesticides, heavy metals (such as lead and arsenic),    antibiotics, decongestants  and the DNA of endangered snow    leopards. (Animal parts, including those of endangered animals,    are often used in traditional Chinese medicines, says Gorski.)  <\/p>\n<p>    The presence of toxic materials in these medicines is not a    minor matter. Recent studies have suggested that herbal    medicines are the leading cause of drug-induced liver failure    in China and other countries where TCM is rapidly becoming    popular, such as South Korea and Singapore, Gorski points    out.  <\/p>\n<p>    Like other forms of alternative medicine, TCM is built on a    myth. Gorski explains:  <\/p>\n<p>      [T]he exportation of TCM to the world was quite deliberate,      as part of a strategy [by the former Communist leader of      China, Mao Zedong] to popularize it among the Chinese. There      was a problem, however. There was no such thing as      traditional Chinese medicine per se. Rather, there were      traditional Chinese medicines. For many centuries,      healing practices in China had been highly variable. Attempts      at institutionalizing medical education were mostly      unsuccessful and most practitioners drew at will on a      mixture of demonology, astrology, yin-yang five phases      theory, classic texts, folk wisdom, and personal experience.    <\/p>\n<p>      Mao realized that TCM would be unappealing to foreigners, as      even many Chinese, particularly those with an education,      understood that TCM was mostly quackery. For instance, in      1923, [the Chinese writer] Lu Xun realized that Chinese      doctors are no more than a type of swindler, either      intentional or unintentional, and I sympathize with deceived      sick people and their families. Such sentiments were common      among the upper classes and the educated. Indeed,  Mao      himself didnt use TCM practitioners. He wanted scientific      Western medicine. The same was true of educated Chinese. It      still is. TCM is far less popular among educated middle class      and affluent Chinese than conventional medicine.    <\/p>\n<p>    Yet that hasnt stopped the current Chinese government from    passing a new law, which goes into effect in July, that    mandates the integration of Chinese and Western medicine    throughout their country.  <\/p>\n<p>    The purpose of the law, says Gorski, is to elevate the status    of TCM to the equivalent of Western medicine  and thus provide    a cheaper way of delivering medicine to Chinas overrun medical    system.  <\/p>\n<p>    One also cant help but notice that a lot of this new law goes    towards protecting the business interests of the TCM industry    in a manner that, if it were done for the pharmaceutical    company, would provoke howls of outrage from [alternative    medicine] proponents  and rightly so, writes Gorski.  <\/p>\n<p>    FMI: You can read Gorskis article on the Science-Based Medicine website.    Kaplans can be found at the STAT website.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Visit link: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.minnpost.com\/second-opinion\/2017\/02\/potential-dangers-and-dubious-history-alternative-medicine-are-often-unknown-\" title=\"Potential dangers and dubious history of alternative medicine are often unknown to its consumers - MinnPost\">Potential dangers and dubious history of alternative medicine are often unknown to its consumers - MinnPost<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Anyone who uses homeopathy, acupuncture or other alternative over-the-counter therapies particularly if they use them on their children needs to read two recently published articles on the topic. One of the articles, published last week in the Boston Globes health website STAT, takes an in-depth look at the incredibly troubling story behind a popular homeopathic teething product that harmed hundreds of children in the United States before it was finally pulled from the market last fall. The U.S <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/alternative-medicine\/potential-dangers-and-dubious-history-of-alternative-medicine-are-often-unknown-to-its-consumers-minnpost\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187738],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180503","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alternative-medicine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180503"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180503"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180503\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180503"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180503"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180503"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}