{"id":180424,"date":"2017-02-28T19:45:45","date_gmt":"2017-03-01T00:45:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/taming-traits-from-the-wild-genome-good-fruit-grower\/"},"modified":"2017-02-28T19:45:45","modified_gmt":"2017-03-01T00:45:45","slug":"taming-traits-from-the-wild-genome-good-fruit-grower","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/taming-traits-from-the-wild-genome-good-fruit-grower\/","title":{"rendered":"Taming traits from the wild genome &#8211; Good Fruit Grower"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      The second generation of apple trees bred with resistance to      blue mold from a wild ancestor are growing in the U.S.      Department of Agricultures Appalachian Fruit Research      Laboratory in Kearneysville, West Virginia. DNA tests      developed through RosBREED and apples genetically engineered      to flower early are helping researchers introduce the disease      resistance into high-quality cultivars faster. (Courtesy      Jay Norelli, USDA Appalachian Fruit Research Laboratory)    <\/p>\n<p>    Over generations, as breeders have selected apple trees with    the best flavor, size and color, resistance to many common    diseases was lost.  <\/p>\n<p>    But genes for resistance are often still lurking in wild apple    ancestors, and new DNA tools are giving breeders the power to    return those key genes to domestic apple varieties in a matter    of years, not decades.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the case of blue mold  the most significant postharvest    disorder globally  scientists found resistance hiding in the    genome of Malus sieversii, the wild Eurasian apple from which    the domestic species was derived. Now, researchers with the    U.S. Department of Agricultures Appalachian Fruit Research    Station in Kearneysville, West Virginia, are breeding that wild    resistance back into an elite breeding parent.  <\/p>\n<p>    New tools are helping them to do it fast: Cultivars are    expected to be ready for breeders in just a few more years,    said Jay Norelli, the plant pathologist leading the project.    We are tapping into the latest advantages that have been made    in genomics science to really advance the efficiency of apple    breeding, Norelli said.  <\/p>\n<p>    But while some of the tools used to expedite breeding are the    result of genetic engineering, Norelli stressed that the    process is not creating genetically modified apples.  <\/p>\n<p>    The final, blue-mold resistant cultivar will have no    genetically modified DNA. Thats very important to growers    because some consumers have been wary of genetically modified    crops, he said.  <\/p>\n<p>    All the genomics tools are available thanks to RosBREED  a    national team of scientists seeking to improve the quality and    disease resistance of apple, blackberry, peach, pear, rose,    strawberry and sweet and tart cherry crops  and to a sister    effort in Europe known as FruitBreedomics.  <\/p>\n<p>    The American project was funded by the U.S. Department of    Agriculture first in 2009 with a $14 million grant to look at    fruit quality traits, then re-upped in 2015 for a $10 million    focus on disease resistance.  <\/p>\n<p>    From the start, RosBREED has been clear that it was not seeking    to genetically engineer better crops, but rather to use DNA    analysis tools to inform and improve conventional    crossbreeding, said Cameron Peace, RosBREED co-director and    horticulture professor at Washington State University.  <\/p>\n<p>    Every generation, Norelli sends samples from his new seedlings    to Peaces lab at WSU, where RosBREEDs DNA-informed breeding    programs for apple and cherries are based.  <\/p>\n<p>    The lab focuses on translating discoveries from genomics    research into strategies breeders can use, Peace said.  <\/p>\n<p>    So far, his lab is developing DNA markers for disease    resistance, fruit color, acidity levels and other desirable    traits so that breeders can test and select seedlings without    waiting for fruit.  <\/p>\n<p>    That saves breeders the expense and time of growing a nursery    full of trees that lack the desired genes in search of the    perfect fruit. Eventually, RosBREED aims to help commercial    service providers offer the tests it develops to breeders,    expanding access to the tools, Peace said.  <\/p>\n<p>      One-year-old apple trees are fruiting, thanks to an      early-flowering gene that accelerates the crossbreeding      process. These trees are the second generation of a cross to      bring blue mold resistance from a wild apple ancestor into a      modern cultivar. This fruit will be exposed to blue mold to      verify that the DNA test scientists are using in the breeding      program is accurate. (Courtesy Jay Norelli, USDA      Appalachian Fruit Research Laboratory)    <\/p>\n<p>    The challenge for breeders is that the wild ancestors carrying    resistance also come with lots of undesirable traits that have    been bred out of modern apples.  <\/p>\n<p>    Keeping only the key resistance gene traditionally required    four or five decades of back-crossing with high-quality    cultivars to get rid of that wild DNA. Now, DNA-markers and    genetically engineered tools have dramatically improved the    pace.  <\/p>\n<p>    Locating the blue mold resistance marker involved developing a    genetic map of a cross between the resistant wild apple and a    Royal Gala.  <\/p>\n<p>    Then scientists compared the DNA of all the offspring to find    the DNA associated with the resistance trait. In the case of    blue mold, there was one clear spot on one of the apples 17    chromosomes associated with resistance.  <\/p>\n<p>    That key finding enabled the research to move forward much more    quickly and is much easier to work with than a trait that    appears to be associated with multiple genes, Norelli said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Once that locus  a location on a chromosome  was identified,    WSU researchers built a DNA test to assess which seedlings    inherited the resistance gene.  <\/p>\n<p>    The growing library of DNA tests means that Norellis seedlings    can also be screened for about 10 other desirable traits, such    as acidity and skin color, Peace said.  <\/p>\n<p>    In traditional breeding efforts combining two already    high-quality cultivars, fewer DNA tests are usually needed, but    theres a lot more bad genetics in this material from the wild    apple, Peace said. Using all the tests on each generation of    seedlings helps to weed out those unwanted wild genes faster.  <\/p>\n<p>    Before DNA tests, breeders measured disease resistance by    purposely infecting new trees. But having access to the genetic    markers is a huge advantage, especially for a disease like blue    mold, which causes fruit decay during storage rather than    damages the tree itself.  <\/p>\n<p>    For a lot of diseases like scab and fire blight, we can screen    seedlings directly with the pathogens, but DNA tests are    better. And one of the big advantages of DNA markers for fruit    traits is it saves us years versus waiting for apples, Norelli    said.  <\/p>\n<p>    To speed up the breeding process even further, Norelli is using    a genetically modified apple that carries a gene from a birch    tree that initiates early flowering. By using it as a parent,    his trees are blooming and ready to breed at just over a year    old, instead of having to wait three years for each generation    to flower.  <\/p>\n<p>    That transgene for early flowering was introduced into the    Pinata cultivar by German researchers, who used it in a similar    way to breed fire blight resistance into modern cultivars as    part of the FruitBreedomics project.  <\/p>\n<p>    The early flowering trait comes from a single, dominant gene,    which means that every generation, half the seedlings produced    are early flowering; the other half flower normally because    they did not inherit the chromosome with the transgene.  <\/p>\n<p>    To accelerate this breeding process, Norelli crossed the    parents  the offspring of the wild apple and the Royal Gala    and the Pinata cultivar containing the birch tree gene  in the    conventional manner and selected offspring with both the    resistance gene and the early flowering gene. Now, he is    continuing to cross those offspring for several more    generations to weed out unwanted wild apple genes.  <\/p>\n<p>    Once that breeding process creates high-quality, blue mold    resistant cultivars, Norelli will no longer need the early    flowering gene. So in the final round of the breeding process,    he will select offspring that dont carry the transgenic gene    from the birch tree  and thus are not considered genetically    modified  to grow into normal apple trees.  <\/p>\n<p>    The second generation of blue-mold resistant, early flowering    apple trees are growing in the U.S. Department of Agriculture    greenhouse in West Virginia. Some of the spindly trees are    already fruiting. But even high-tech tools need to be proven in    the nursery. So, Norelli is preparing to test the DNA-based    breeding by exposing the first crop of fruit to the blue mold    fungus, so he can evaluate how susceptible they really are.  <\/p>\n<p>    We are validating whether that test actually predicts    resistance. Thats really important because before we at    RosBREED release a tool, we test it so breeders can use it with    confidence, Norelli said.  <\/p>\n<p>    If the test proves itself, as scientists suspect, the cultivar    should be ready for breeders by 2019. There are a few more    crosses to go, Norelli said, to maximize the domestic apple    genes and minimize the wild genes. To meet that deadline, the    team is employing one more novel genetic tool that helps to    select seedlings with the least wild DNA.  <\/p>\n<p>    Every new generation has a mix of its parents traits     typically 50-50  but due to some genetic rearranging that    happens as chromosomes are passed on, theres always a little    variation.  <\/p>\n<p>    By the third generation, about 25 percent of the genetics    should be M. seversii, but because of crossing over of the    chromosomes, some have less and some have more, Norelli said.    Were using a DNA test to track how much wild DNA is left.  <\/p>\n<p>    FruitBreedomics developed the test to track apples lineage by    looking at about 20,000 loci. Thats far from sequencing the    entire genome, but it provides a significant snapshot of an    apples 17 chromosomes.  <\/p>\n<p>    After the test is run on each parent  the wild apple, Royal    Gala, and Pinata with the early flowering gene  the offspring    can be compared to see how much they still resemble the wild    apple. With that insight, Norelli can beat the 50-50 odds    slightly with each cross and select those seedlings with both    the key traits and the least wild DNA to give rise to his next    generation.  <\/p>\n<p>    With the accelerated system, that should be a one- to two-year    window to get that next generation, he said. Our first    objective is to produce elite breeding parents with resistance    alleles and then trying to incorporate other resistance alleles    for fire blight and scab.  <\/p>\n<p>     by Kate Prengaman  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>View post:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.goodfruit.com\/taming-traits-from-the-wild-genome\/\" title=\"Taming traits from the wild genome - Good Fruit Grower\">Taming traits from the wild genome - Good Fruit Grower<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The second generation of apple trees bred with resistance to blue mold from a wild ancestor are growing in the U.S. Department of Agricultures Appalachian Fruit Research Laboratory in Kearneysville, West Virginia. DNA tests developed through RosBREED and apples genetically engineered to flower early are helping researchers introduce the disease resistance into high-quality cultivars faster.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/taming-traits-from-the-wild-genome-good-fruit-grower\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180424","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genome"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180424"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180424"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180424\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180424"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180424"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180424"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}