{"id":180113,"date":"2017-02-26T23:44:44","date_gmt":"2017-02-27T04:44:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/whittaker-chambers-crusading-journalist-the-liberty-conservative-the-liberty-conservative\/"},"modified":"2017-02-26T23:44:44","modified_gmt":"2017-02-27T04:44:44","slug":"whittaker-chambers-crusading-journalist-the-liberty-conservative-the-liberty-conservative","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/atlas-shrugged\/whittaker-chambers-crusading-journalist-the-liberty-conservative-the-liberty-conservative\/","title":{"rendered":"Whittaker Chambers: Crusading Journalist | The Liberty Conservative &#8211; The Liberty Conservative"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Because of his role in    outing Soviet spy Alger Hiss, Whittaker Chambers other career,    not that of paid witness he would become, has been    overshadowed. For Chambers was a journalist par excellence. He    had the distinction of having written for the New Masses, Time,    and National Review.  <\/p>\n<p>    At the time of his testimony, he was a highly-paid writer at    Time. The pro-Hiss left no doubt wishes hed stayed at the    typewriter rather than appearing behind a congressional    microphone. Without Chambers, the Hiss case would never have    gotten off the ground and Chambers would have toiled away his    remaining days writing for Time, and Hiss leaking from the    Carnegie Endowment for International Peace to Moscow.  <\/p>\n<p>    To examine Chambers career without the Hiss case is, of    course, impossible, but to examine his career solely on    journalistic grounds reveals links between the different    ideological magazines he wrote for. At first glance, a writer    first for New Masses, then Time, then National Review shows    chartable growth from communism to the mainstream then    overshooting it into another political sect, the Buckley    conservatives of the 1950s. But whatever party label he    sported, his basic journalistic mission never changed, nor did    his view of collectivist action.  <\/p>\n<p>    While on the New Masses, Chambers differentiated himself from    others by showing Marxists acting rather than preaching:  <\/p>\n<p>      It occurred to me thatI might by writing, not political      polemics which few people ever wanted to read, but stories      that anybody might want to readstories in which the correct      conduct of the Communist would be shown and without political      comment.    <\/p>\n<p>    The most praised of this formula, Can You Hear Their Voices?    appeared in the January 1931 issue of the Masses, dealt with    activist farmers who raid a food store during the worst of the    Depression. Awakened to their collective power, they take food    and arms into the mountains, like one of those resistance    groups in a World War II film.  <\/p>\n<p>    By the time his byline appeared in Time Magazine, Chambers had    gone through six years of espionage work for the NKVD. NO    longer pushing the history train toward the Revolution,    Chambers was now trying to derail it. But the populist sense of    reaching the masses via journalism remained.  <\/p>\n<p>    Surveying the aftereffects on Western fellow travelers of the    Hitler-Stalin Pact, Chambers saw his armed band of farmers    circa 1931 now betrayed by this nave cadre who themselves    thought they had enlisted in the cause of antifascism but were    merely serving another variant of it:  <\/p>\n<p>      How could they know that Lenin was the first fascist and      that they were cooperating with the Party from which the      Nazis borrowed all their important methods and ideas? By last      week even the dullest fellow traveler found outAfter      Stalins purge, the Nazi-Soviet Pact, Russian grab of half of      Poland, 1940 betrayed the full sense of Stalin with his      attacks on Finland, the seizure of part of Rumania and all of      the Baltic States.    <\/p>\n<p>    But Chambers hope for collective action remained, now centered    on those who had fallen off the history train:  <\/p>\n<p>      The Party had trained a group of men who would one day help      destroy it. The literary intellectuals might be slow, lazy,      self-important, impracticalbut they had reached their      convictions not without years in the wilderness and days of      blindness.    <\/p>\n<p>    Chambers saw hope for a counterrevolution in Waldo Franks    outline for action in Chart for Rough Weather and the writers    observation that the struggle is for the human soul.  <\/p>\n<p>    The election of 1944 saw the Partys most open and fervent    support for FDR and the growing alarm of conservatives, and    some liberals, about cultural dominance by Stalinists at home    and their suspicious liberations of Nazi satellites abroad. It    was also the year Chambers Ghosts on the Roof appeared in    Time magazine. In it, Chambers was again trying to activate    readers, this time through the approving ghosts of the murdered    Nicholas and Alexandria toward the Party that murdered them.    For the Czar, Stalin accomplished only what he had dreamed    about:  <\/p>\n<p>      What vision! What power! We have known nothing like it since      my ancestor, Peter the Great, broke a window into Europe by      overrunning the Baltic States in the 18th century. Stalin has      made us great again!    <\/p>\n<p>    Examining the Pact, the Czar noted rather enviously, I always    wanted to take down those Poles a peg, but something was always    tying my hands.  <\/p>\n<p>    A decade later, Chambers again took up the familiar profession    of journalism, this time on the staff of National Review. By    now, he had gone through the emotionally brutalizing    participation in the Hiss case, which provoked one suicide    attempt. But his vision of journalism remained although this    time focused on a very specific group: conservative    Republicans. As opposed to 1941, he counseled his new comrades    to cease their attempts at rolling back the New Deal (their    stated editorial mission was for the magazine to stand athwart    history, yelling Stop) and instead reap the benefits of    accepting the drift of History:  <\/p>\n<p>      Those who remain in the world, if they will not surrender to      its terms, must maneuver within its terms. That is what      conservatives must decide: how much to give in order to      survive at all: how much to give up basic principles.    <\/p>\n<p>    This sense of mission entailed cleansing conservatism of its    more soulless elements such as Ayn Rand. Chambers review of    Atlas Shrugged compared her atheistic capitalism to Karl Marx:    He too admired naked self-interest and for much the same    reasons as Miss Rand: because, he believed, it cleansed away    the cobwebs of religion and led to prodigies of industrial and    cognate accomplishments.  <\/p>\n<p>    Thus, had there been no Hiss case, Chambers would have remained    much of what he was: a crusading journalist. The familiar    trajectory of the communist moving rightward fits him on the    surface, but also doesnt. Along the way, he brought baggage    with himnamely the Marxist baggage of journalism as a mass    activator.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to read the rest:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.thelibertyconservative.com\/whittaker-chambers-crusading-journalist\/\" title=\"Whittaker Chambers: Crusading Journalist | The Liberty Conservative - The Liberty Conservative\">Whittaker Chambers: Crusading Journalist | The Liberty Conservative - The Liberty Conservative<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Because of his role in outing Soviet spy Alger Hiss, Whittaker Chambers other career, not that of paid witness he would become, has been overshadowed.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/atlas-shrugged\/whittaker-chambers-crusading-journalist-the-liberty-conservative-the-liberty-conservative\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187827],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180113","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atlas-shrugged"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180113"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180113"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180113\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180113"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180113"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180113"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}