{"id":180001,"date":"2017-02-26T23:08:24","date_gmt":"2017-02-27T04:08:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/civeos-making-nice-progress-seeking-alpha\/"},"modified":"2017-02-26T23:08:24","modified_gmt":"2017-02-27T04:08:24","slug":"civeos-making-nice-progress-seeking-alpha","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/progress\/civeos-making-nice-progress-seeking-alpha\/","title":{"rendered":"Civeo&#8217;s Making Nice Progress &#8211; Seeking Alpha"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    A few days ago, the management team at Civeo    Corp. (NYSE:CVEO) announced that it had finalized its most recent    credit facility redetermination. Seeing as how I own shares in    Civeo, I like to keep up-to-date with the firm's progress and I    know that you, my readers, like to as well (at least those of    you who follow and\/or own it). As such, I determined that it    would be a wise idea for me to provide an update on the company    and give my thoughts on what it all means for the business    moving forward.  <\/p>\n<p>    A touch on their earnings  <\/p>\n<p>    Seeing as how Civeo's earnings just came out the other day, you may be    asking why the focus on this article is not on that news as    opposed to (or in addition to) what I'm writing about. Simply    put, management provided preliminary guidance on financial    results for the fourth fiscal quarter of last year, as well as    provided guidance regarding the company's 2017 sales and other    financial data at an earlier time.  <\/p>\n<p>    I wrote about it in this    article but the gist of it is that management's forecast    for 2016's fourth quarter revenue was in the range of $89    million to $92 million (actual result was $90.92 million) and    for EBITDA it came out to $16 million to $18 million (actual    result was $17.7 million). For 2017, sales guidance is still as    it was at between $337 million and $353 million, while EBITDA    guidance is still calling for a range of between $60 million    and $65 million. In essence, nothing really changed too much    from what was forecast.  <\/p>\n<p>    A look at management's newest move  <\/p>\n<p>    One problem with Civeo is that it has a meaningful amount of    credit facility debt that can be cut below their borrowings if    lenders elect to force such a situation. So long as this does    not happen, the firm is fine, but if lenders ever become scared    and this number gets pulled down too low, the end result could    make shareholders quite unhappy since it could result in the    business going under in a worst-case scenario or could force    additional share offerings and\/or require it to take on debt at    materially-higher interest rates in order to account for the    difference.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    *Taken from Civeo  <\/p>\n<p>    Fortunately, according to management, the firm just went    through its most recent redetermination and struck a deal with    lenders wherein it had seen its lender commitment drop by $75    million from $350 million to $275 million. In the image above, you can see what the picture    looked like before the deal was struck (no similar table has    been provided for the post-agreement). This is particularly    interesting because, according to their existing facilities    agreement, Civeo has to pay a small amount of interest on any    proceeds not currently being used (this is standard for credit    facilities and I don't think I have ever seen one that didn't    have this kind of stipulation).  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    *Taken from Civeo  <\/p>\n<p>    I will get to the other aspect of the deal in a moment but the    reason why this is important is that, based on the company's    current leverage ratio, which I estimate, using its projected    2017 EBITDA of $60 million to $65 million, is between 4.23 and    4.58. As you can see in the image above, this means that on any    undrawn amount, Civeo must pay between 0.90% per year and 1.01%    per year. By reducing this number by $75 million, management is    reducing interest expense, keeping all else the same, by    between $0.68 million and $0.76 million per year.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    *Taken from Civeo  <\/p>\n<p>    Every little bit helps but if this were all I was writing on, I    wouldn't say it's enough to warrant your attention. What does    warrant it, however, is that, in exchange for management    striking this deal, they also were able to change their    allowable leverage ratios for the better. In the image above, you can see what their leverage    ratios were prior to their agreement and in the image below,    you can see their current allowable leverage ratios post-deal.    At first glance, this may not seem like much but it could make    all the difference in Civeo's long-term survival.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    *Taken from Civeo  <\/p>\n<p>    Let's take, for example, the end of 2017. Under their prior    deal, the firm would be allowed, assuming its EBITDA estimates    are correct, to hold debt of between $300 million and $325    million. Now that number has increased to between $351 million    and $380.25 million. For the third quarter of 2018 (the last    number shown on the original table), the disparity is even    larger, with management only allowed to have debt of between    $210 million and $227.5 million compared to the same $351    million to $380.25 million range cited above.  <\/p>\n<p>    In its press release on this development, management said that    one benefit to this change in their agreement is that the    company has greater financial flexibility. In detailing this,    they noted specifically that it could allow them to engage in    acquisitions, a move that I would applaud if management can    find a suitable prospect. One downside, though, is that if    their leverage ratio is at 5.50 or higher, they will be forced    to pay an interest rate that is 0.5% higher than what they are    paying today, but if the firm does decide to buy up something,    then it's unlikely to be an asset or business where such a    small increase in the interest rate would have a material    impact on the firm (otherwise, they shouldn't be buying    anything).  <\/p>\n<p>    Takeaway  <\/p>\n<p>    Based on the data provided, it looks as though management    continues to make some nice progress given Civeo's    circumstances. Even though I did not like their public share    offering earlier this year, I do like to see improved financial    flexibility, especially if it can lead to an acquisition, and I    also enjoy seeing interest expense falling, even if the move is    immaterial in and of itself.  <\/p>\n<p>    Disclosure: I am\/we are long CVEO.  <\/p>\n<p>    I wrote this article myself,    and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving    compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no    business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned    in this article.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>The rest is here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/seekingalpha.com\/article\/4049840-civeos-making-nice-progress\" title=\"Civeo's Making Nice Progress - Seeking Alpha\">Civeo's Making Nice Progress - Seeking Alpha<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> A few days ago, the management team at Civeo Corp. (NYSE:CVEO) announced that it had finalized its most recent credit facility redetermination <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/progress\/civeos-making-nice-progress-seeking-alpha\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187725],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-progress"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180001"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180001"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180001\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}