{"id":179811,"date":"2017-02-25T14:57:07","date_gmt":"2017-02-25T19:57:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment-does-not-cover-weapons-of-war-us\/"},"modified":"2017-02-25T14:57:07","modified_gmt":"2017-02-25T19:57:07","slug":"second-amendment-does-not-cover-weapons-of-war-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/second-amendment-does-not-cover-weapons-of-war-us\/","title":{"rendered":"Second Amendment does not cover &#8216;weapons of war,&#8217; US &#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    February 22, 2017 \"Assault weapons\" are not covered    by the Second Amendment, a federal appeals court has found.  <\/p>\n<p>    On Tuesday, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 10-4 to    uphold a Maryland law, which bans 45 kinds of guns and places a    10-round limit on gun magazines. The law  implemented after    the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting that killed 20    students and six teachers in Newtown, Conn.  is intended to    protect against gun violence.  <\/p>\n<p>    For Judge Robert King and the majority in this ruling, certain    kinds of rifles are weapons of war, meaning they are not    covered under the Second Amendmentfor the purpose    of self-defense. That distinction is explicitly drawn in the    2008 Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller,    Mr. King wrote.  <\/p>\n<p>    Others on the court sided with gun rights advocates, arguing    that the right to bear arms does not depend on the weapon    chosen, and noting the popularity of military style rifles.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"For a law-abiding citizen who, for whatever reason, chooses to    protect his home with a semi-automatic rifle instead of a    semi-automatic handgun, Maryland's law clearly imposes a    significant burden on the exercise of the right to arm oneself    at home, wrote Judge William Traxlerin a dissent,    calling for a stringent review of the decision.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the wake of shootings like Sandy Hook and Orlando, where    so-called military-style \"assault\" rifles were used, local    communities and advocacy groups have pushed for limits on the    types of weapons available for sale. After the Orlando    shooting, 57 percent of Americans    supported a nationwide ban on assault weapons, according to    a CBS News poll.  <\/p>\n<p>    Similar gun control bills have struggled to gain traction in    Congress, leaving states to implement their own bans as they    see fit. Currently, seven states and the District of Columbia    have enacted laws banning    semiautomatic rifles, according to the Law Center to Prevent    Gun Violence, a gun control advocacy group.  <\/p>\n<p>    Some of these laws have faced legal challenges on Second    Amendment grounds. In the case of Maryland, the National Rifle    Association is exploring its options for appealing the ruling,    NRA spokeswoman Jennifer Baker told the Associated Press.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"It is absurd to hold that the most popular rifle in America is    not a protected 'arm' under the Second Amendment, she said,    saying the NRA estimates between 5 million and 10 million    AR-15s are currently owned legally in the United States. That    means, she indicated, that the Maryland ruling goes against a    provision inD.C. v. Heller that protects weapons    that are in common and lawful use at the time from being    banned.  <\/p>\n<p>    The US Supreme Court has been reluctant to hear such Second    Amendment challenges, however. In June, the nations highest    court declined to take up cases against similar gun bans in New    York and Connecticut.  <\/p>\n<p>    Legal scholars suggest the Supreme Court typically wont get    involved unless lower courts cant reach consensus. In that    way, they say, the Supreme Court gives tacit approval to state    bans on certain kinds of guns.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Maryland law, which supporters say backs up the states    interest in protecting public safety, is still open to scrutiny    at the lower level, and it remains to be seen whether the    Supreme Court would consider any Second Amendment challenge.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Governments are now in the process of testing what restraints the    Court will consider to be reasonable and which it will    not, John Vile, a constitutional scholar at Middle Tennessee    State University in Murfreesboro, told Henry Gass for The    Christian Science Monitor in June.  <\/p>\n<p>    This report contains material from the Associated Press and    Reuters.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the article here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.csmonitor.com\/USA\/Justice\/2017\/0222\/Second-Amendment-does-not-cover-weapons-of-war-US-appeals-court-finds\" title=\"Second Amendment does not cover 'weapons of war,' US ...\">Second Amendment does not cover 'weapons of war,' US ...<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> February 22, 2017 \"Assault weapons\" are not covered by the Second Amendment, a federal appeals court has found. On Tuesday, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 10-4 to uphold a Maryland law, which bans 45 kinds of guns and places a 10-round limit on gun magazines <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/second-amendment-does-not-cover-weapons-of-war-us\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[193621],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-179811","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-second-amendment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179811"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=179811"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179811\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=179811"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=179811"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=179811"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}