Personal Liberty Poll <\/p>\n
Exercise your right to vote. <\/p>\n
In an effort to make websites more advertiser friendly some media outlets have taken to eliminating comment sections where, without considerable effort from moderators, they are unable to control the direction of reader conversations. But a Google-funded algorithm could change that via censorship. <\/p>\n
The technology, called Perspective, uses machine-learning to ferret out toxic comments. Its designers reportedly based the technologys moderation standards on those used by the team of human moderators tasked with keeping discourse civil on The New York Times website. The Times is also reportedly now using Perspective to expand the number of articles it allows comments to appear on without overtaxing its moderation team. <\/p>\n
Developers explain how the tool works thusly: <\/p>\n
Perspective is an API that makes it easier to host better conversations. The API uses machine learning models to score the perceived impact a comment might have on a conversation. Developers and publishers can use this score to give realtime feedback to commenters or help moderators do their job, or allow readers to more easily find relevant information, as illustrated in two experiments below. Well be releasing more machine learning models later in the year, but our first model identifies whether a comment could be perceived as toxic to a discussion. <\/p>\n
The level of potential toxicity appears largely based on the use of vulgarity or insulting language in comments. <\/p>\n
Here are a few examples of comments the technology would deem highly toxic in comments: <\/p>\n
And here are a few that are considered the least toxic: <\/p>\n
Personal insults and name calling cheapen any pointand theres certainly no shortage of uncomfortable language on the internet. But is the top-down sanitation of comment sections really the answer? <\/p>\n
How long before the machine decides whole topics are too uncomfortable for discussion and are likely to cause readers to leave? <\/p>\n
And if the problem is online harassment, are we really going to pretend that simply silencing the true assholes among us will make them disappear? Theyll still be out there Ever been in a big city traffic jam? <\/p>\n
Civility is important. But pretending that life isnt uncomfortable, and partially so because of the personalities of people we have to deal with, isnt the answer. <\/p>\n
Besides, sometimes you just have to call a spade a spade or a f*cking moron. <\/p>\n
. Bookmark the<\/p>\n
.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
See the article here: Personal Liberty Poll Exercise your right to vote. In an effort to make websites more advertiser friendly some media outlets have taken to eliminating comment sections where, without considerable effort from moderators, they are unable to control the direction of reader conversations. Continue reading
\nBehold the censorship machine! - Personal Liberty Digest<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"