{"id":179510,"date":"2017-02-24T17:53:55","date_gmt":"2017-02-24T22:53:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/biologists-propose-to-sequence-the-dna-of-all-life-on-earth-science-magazine\/"},"modified":"2017-02-24T17:53:55","modified_gmt":"2017-02-24T22:53:55","slug":"biologists-propose-to-sequence-the-dna-of-all-life-on-earth-science-magazine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/biologists-propose-to-sequence-the-dna-of-all-life-on-earth-science-magazine\/","title":{"rendered":"Biologists propose to sequence the DNA of all life on Earth &#8211; Science Magazine"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>        Can biologists sequence the genomes of all the plants and        the animals in the world, including this greater bird of        paradise in Indonesia?      <\/p>\n<p>      TIM LAMAN\/National Geographic Creative    <\/p>\n<p>    By Elizabeth    PennisiFeb. 24, 2017 , 1:15 PM  <\/p>\n<p>    WASHINGTON, D.C.When it comes to genome    sequencing, visionaries like to throw around big numbers:    Theres the UK Biobank, for example, which    promises to decipher the genomes of 500,000 individuals, or    Icelands effort to     study the genomes of its entire human population.    Yesterday, at a meeting here organized by the Smithsonian    Initiative onBiodiversity Genomics and the Shenzhen,    Chinabased sequencing powerhouse BGI, a small group of    researchers upped the ante even more, announcing their intent    to, eventually, sequence all life on Earth.  <\/p>\n<p>    Their plan, which does not yet have funding dedicated to it    specifically but could cost at least several billions of    dollars, has been dubbed the Earth BioGenome Project (EBP).    Harris Lewin, an evolutionary genomicist at the University of    California, Davis, who is part of the group that came up with    this vision 2 years ago, says the EBP would take a first step    toward its audacious goal by focusing on eukaryotesthe group    of organisms that includes all plants, animals, and    single-celled organisms such as amoebas.  <\/p>\n<p>    That strategy, and the EBPs overall concept, found a receptive    audience at BioGenomics2017, a gathering    this week of conservationists, evolutionary biologists,    systematists, and other biologists interested in applying    genomics to their work. This is a grand idea, says Oliver    Ryder, a conservation biologist at the San Diego Zoo    Institute for Conservation Research in California. If we    really want to understand how life evolved, genome biology is    going to be part of that.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ryder and others drew parallels between the EBP and the Human    Genome Project, which began as an ambitious, controversial,    and, at the time, technically impossible proposal more than 30    years ago.That earlier effort eventually led not only to    the sequencing of the first human genome, but also to entirely    new DNA technologies that are at the center of many medical    frontiers and the basis for a     $20 billion industry. People have learned from the human    genome experience that [sequencing] is a tremendous advance in    biology, Lewin says.  <\/p>\n<p>    Many details about the EBP are still being worked out. But as    currently proposed, the first step would be to sequence in    great detail the DNA of a member of each eukaryotic family    (about 9000 in all) to create reference genomes on par or    better than the reference human genome. Next would come    sequencing to a lesser degree a species from each of the    150,000 to 200,000 genera. Finally, EBP participants would get    rough genomes of the 1.5 million remaining known eukaryotic    species. These lower resolution genomes could be improved as    needed by comparing them with the family references or by doing    more sequencing, says EBP co-organizer Gene Robinson, a    behavioral genomics researcher and director of the Carl R.    Woese Institute for Genomic Biology at the University of    Illinois in Urbana.  <\/p>\n<p>        In this representation of the tree of life, there are very        few completed genomes (red lines in inner rim) among named        eukaryotes (green), but many more among bacteria (blue) and        archaea (purple). Among the millions of eukaryotic        species, there are even relatively few lower resolution        genome sequences (blue, light and dark gray).      <\/p>\n<p>      Keith A. Crandall, David B. Stern, and Jimmy Bernot of The      George Washington Universitys Computational Biology      Institute    <\/p>\n<p>    The entire eukaryotic effort would likely cost about the same    as it did to sequence that first human genome, estimate Lewin,    Robinson, and EBP co-organizer John Kress, an evolutionary    biologist at the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History    here. It took about $2.7 billion to read and order the 3    billion bases composing the human genome, about $4.8 billion in    todays dollars. With a comparable amount of support, the EBPs    eukaryotic work might be done in a decade, its organizers    suggest.  <\/p>\n<p>    Such optimism arises from ever-decreasing DNA sequencing    costsone meeting presenter fromComplete Genomics, based    in Mountain View, California, says his company plans to be able    to roughly sequence whole eukaryotic genomes for about $100    within a yearand improvements in sequencing technology that    make possible higher quality genomes, at reasonable prices. It    became apparent to me that at a certain point, it would be    possible to sequence all life on Earth, Lewin says.  <\/p>\n<p>    Although some may find the multibillion-dollar price tag hard    to justify for researchers not studying humans, the    fundamentals of matter, or the mysteries of the universe, the    EBP has a head start, thanks to the work of several research    communities pursuing their own ambitious sequencing projects.    These include the Genome 10K Project, which seeks to sequence    10,000 vertebrate genomes, one from each genus; i5K, an effort    to decipher 5000 arthropods; and B10K, which expects to    generate genomes for all 10,500 bird species. The EBP would    help coordinate, compile, and perhaps fund these efforts. The    [EBP] concept is a community of communities, Lewin says.  <\/p>\n<p>    There are also sequencing commitments from giants in the    genomics field, such as Chinas BGI, and the Wellcome Trust    Sanger Institute in the United Kingdom. But at a planning    meeting this week, it became clear that significant challenges    await the EBP, even beyond funding. Although researchers from    Brazil, China, and the United Kingdom said their nations are    eager to participate in some way, the 20 people in attendance    emphasized the need for the effort to be more international,    with developing countries, particularly those with high    biodiversity, helping shape the projects final form. They    proposed that the EBP could help develop sequencing and other    technological experts and capabilities in those regions. The    Global Genome Biodiversity Network, which is compiling lists    and images of specimens at museums and other biorepositories    around the world, could supply much of the DNA needed, but even    broader participation is important, says Thomas Gilbert, an    evolutionary biologist at the Natural History Museum of Denmark    in Copenhagen.  <\/p>\n<p>    The planning group also stressed the need to develop standards    to ensure high-quality genome sequences and to preserve    associated information for each organism sequenced, such as    where it was collected and what it looked like. Getting DNA    samples from the wild may ultimately be the biggest    challengeand the biggest cost, several people noted. Not all    museum specimens yield DNA preserved well enough for    high-quality genomes. Even recently collected and frozen plant    and animal specimens are not always handled correctly for    preserving their DNA, says Guojie Zhang, an evolutionary    biologist at BGI and the University of Copenhagen. And the lack    of standards could undermine the projects ultimate utility,    notes Erich Jarvis, a neurobiologist at The Rockefeller    University in New York City: We could spend money on an effort    for all species on the planet, but we could generate a lot of    crap.  <\/p>\n<p>    But Lewin is optimistic that wont happen. After he outlined    the EBP in the closing talk at BioGenomics2017, he was    surrounded by researchers eager to know what they could do to    help. Its good to try to bring together the tribes, says    Jose Lopez, a biologist from Nova Southeastern University in    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, whose tribe has mounted GIGA, a    project to sequence 7000 marine invertebrates. Its a big    endeavor. We need lots of expertise and lots of people who can    contribute.  <\/p>\n<p>  Please note that, in an effort to combat spam, comments with  hyperlinks will not be published.<\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See original here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencemag.org\/news\/2017\/02\/biologists-propose-sequence-dna-all-life-earth\" title=\"Biologists propose to sequence the DNA of all life on Earth - Science Magazine\">Biologists propose to sequence the DNA of all life on Earth - Science Magazine<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Can biologists sequence the genomes of all the plants and the animals in the world, including this greater bird of paradise in Indonesia? TIM LAMAN\/National Geographic Creative By Elizabeth PennisiFeb. 24, 2017 , 1:15 PM WASHINGTON, D.C.When it comes to genome sequencing, visionaries like to throw around big numbers: Theres the UK Biobank, for example, which promises to decipher the genomes of 500,000 individuals, or Icelands effort to study the genomes of its entire human population.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/biologists-propose-to-sequence-the-dna-of-all-life-on-earth-science-magazine\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-179510","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genome"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179510"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=179510"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179510\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=179510"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=179510"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=179510"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}