{"id":179020,"date":"2017-02-22T04:14:31","date_gmt":"2017-02-22T09:14:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/apple-joining-google-amazon-facebook-on-artificial-intelligence-cio-today\/"},"modified":"2017-02-22T04:14:31","modified_gmt":"2017-02-22T09:14:31","slug":"apple-joining-google-amazon-facebook-on-artificial-intelligence-cio-today","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/artificial-intelligence\/apple-joining-google-amazon-facebook-on-artificial-intelligence-cio-today\/","title":{"rendered":"Apple Joining Google, Amazon, Facebook on Artificial Intelligence &#8211; CIO Today"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  By Shirley Siluk \/ CIO Today. Updated January 26, 2017.<\/p>\n<p>    On Friday, Apple filed a lawsuit in Federal District Court for    the Southern District of California alleging that Qualcomm's    practices have cost Apple nearly $1 billion in damages. That    complaint came on the heels of two other lawsuits -- one    seeking more than $145 million in damages -- against Qualcomm    that Apple filed last week in China.  <\/p>\n<p>    Qualcomm is also facing allegations of unfair and    anticompetitive practices by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission.    The FTC filed a complaint against the chipmaker in the U.S.    District Court for the Northern District of California on Jan.    17.  <\/p>\n<p>    'Dominance through Excessive Royalties'  <\/p>\n<p>    The complaints center on Qualcomm's pricing and patent royalty    arrangements for its broadband processors that enable mobile    phones to connect with cellular networks. Qualcomm's modem chip    design was used to help establish standards for the telecom    industry. In return for that standardization, Qualcomm    committed to licensing those technologies to other companies on    FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) terms.  <\/p>\n<p>    However, Apple's complaints contend that Qualcomm is charging    it royalties for \"technologies they have nothing to do with.\"    That statement, contained in an email Apple sent to a number of    press outlets last week, continued, \"The more Apple innovates    with unique features such as TouchID, advanced displays, and    cameras, to name just a few, the more money Qualcomm collects    for no reason and the more expensive it becomes for Apple to    fund these innovations.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Apple said in the email, \"Qualcomm built its business on older,    legacy, standards but reinforces its dominance through    exclusionary tactics and excessive royalties. Despite being    just one of over a dozen companies who contributed to basic    cellular standards, Qualcomm insists on charging Apple at least    five times more in payments than all the other cellular patent    licensors we have agreements with combined.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Most recently, Qualcomm has gone even further, withholding    \"nearly $1B in payments from Apple as retaliation for    responding truthfully to law enforcement agencies investigating    them,\" Apple added.  <\/p>\n<p>    Apple's two complaints in China make similar allegations,    according to a report yesterday by Reuters. Those lawsuits    accuse Qualcomm of abusing its dominant position in the global    chip industry and failing to license its technologies fairly as    it had agreed to do.  <\/p>\n<p>    'A Commercial Dispute over Price of IP'  <\/p>\n<p>    In a statement issued yesterday, Qualcomm said it had not yet    seen the two lawsuits filed in China. The statement included    comments from Qualcomm executive vice president and general    counsel Don Rosenberg.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"These filings by Apple's Chinese subsidiary are just part of    Apple's efforts to find ways to pay less for Qualcomm's    technology. Apple was offered terms consistent with terms    accepted by more than one hundred other Chinese companies and    refused to even consider them,\" Rosenberg said. \"These terms    were consistent with our NDRC Rectification plan. Qualcomm is    prepared to defend its business model anywhere in the world.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    During yesterday's Q1 2017 earnings call, in which Qualcomm    reported year-over-year revenue growth of 4 percent and Q1    revenues of $6 billion, CEO Steven Mollenkopf noted, \"Apple's    complaint contains a lot of assertions. But in the end, this is    a commercial dispute over the price of intellectual property.    They want to pay less than the fair value that Qualcomm has    established in the marketplace for our technology, even though    Apple has generated billions in profits from using that    technology.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    In December, the Korea Fair Trade Commission imposed a fine of    1.03 trillion won ($880 million) on Qualcomm for what it called    an \"unfair business model\" for licensing technology at the    handset rather than chip level. In 2015, the European    Commission also launched two antitrust investigations into    \"possible abusive [behavior]\" by Qualcomm in connection with    its pricing and licensing practices for modem chipsets.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cio-today.com\/article\/index.php?story_id=11200ACI0MNK\" title=\"Apple Joining Google, Amazon, Facebook on Artificial Intelligence - CIO Today\">Apple Joining Google, Amazon, Facebook on Artificial Intelligence - CIO Today<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> By Shirley Siluk \/ CIO Today. Updated January 26, 2017. On Friday, Apple filed a lawsuit in Federal District Court for the Southern District of California alleging that Qualcomm's practices have cost Apple nearly $1 billion in damages.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/artificial-intelligence\/apple-joining-google-amazon-facebook-on-artificial-intelligence-cio-today\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187742],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-179020","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-artificial-intelligence"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179020"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=179020"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179020\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=179020"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=179020"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=179020"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}