Science and evolution, evilution, are continually carried as fact and theory in regards to how things got started around here. But in reality, its where those facts and theories got started that explains why Christian creationism should be the dominant teaching. <\/p>\n
Since the beginning of time, a war has raged, and while the details have remained similar, the methodology has changed. The Bible dictates this war in perfect detail, and clearly states that God has won. It also clearly states that we as Christians are to be opposed to the ways of the world. The Bible, written over the course of creation and history, has dictated the events of today with such incredible accuracy, that it could not have been authored by man alone. <\/p>\n
The purpose of this post is to further arm the Christian in dealing with the ways of this world. <\/p>\n
Evolutionary theory is largely derived from Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallaces theories of evolution explained in detail in Darwins On the Origin of Species (1859) book. Although, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1 August 1744 18 December 1829) was the first to develop a coherent evolutionary theory. However, evolutionary thought can be traced back to the ancient Greeks, Romans, and Chinese as well as medieval Islamic science. <\/p>\n
A significant portion of evolution was derived from Charles Darwin and his book Origin of Species. Darwin, himself was an agnostic influenced by spiritualists. However, the co-author of the book, Alfred Russel Wallace, was not agnostic at all; in fact, he was a was a devotee of spiritualism that included pantheism, paganism, occult ideas, and practices. Wallaces beliefs directly coincide with the New Age Movement, and within the New Age ideology lies an alarming coalition between spiritualism and science. Even further, there is an alarming correlation between Hindu occultism, the New Age movement, and evolution. <\/p>\n
Within Darwin and Wallaces theory of evolution or natural selection is the belief in a tree of life or a universal tree of life. Although Darwin propagated the theory, it was also discovered in Jean-Baptiste Lamarcks writings as well, Lamarck produced the first branching tree of animals. The tree of life is often prescribed to New Age Philosophy, and can be traced back to the mysticism of the Kabbalah, as well as can be discovered in Hindu teachings, ancient Iranian teachings, and even in ancient Egyptian teachings. <\/p>\n
There is significant evidence that evolution is based on occult mysticism rather than science, which can be further understood by William W. Wassynger, M.D., who authored a report for the New York Times on Nov. 27, 1989; in regards to the California Curriculum battle, William claimed <\/p>\n
The process of general evolution could theoretically be reproduced through experimentation, but it never has been. Though speciation has been demonstrated in laboratories, no event beyond speciation has ever been demonstrated. Charles Darwin clearly delineated the differences between speciation and general evolution, and noted that the support for general evolution would have to come from the fossil record. <\/p>\n
In The Origin of Species, Darwin noted that without the appropriate fossil evidence (which did not exist in his day) his general theory would hold no weight. He and others tenaciously clung to the hope that the unfolding of the fossil record would show all of the intermediate forms necessary to support his claims. Today, however, with more than 100,000 species represented in fossils, the lack of intermediate forms is even greater than it was in Darwins day. <\/p>\n
Not only has the fossil record failed, but findings of modern scientists have made general evolutionary theory even less tenable. In Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, for example, Michael Denton methodically analyzes a wealth of evidence that challenges this theory. His subjects include the failure of homology (homologous structures not being represented by homologous genes nor embryonic development); the typological nature of microbiology, and problems associated with chance as a directive force, in addition to the lack of a supportive fossil record. <\/p>\n
Contrary to popular belief, many people disagree with the theory of general evolution, and the idea that all opponents base their views on religious belief is groundless. Michael Denton is neither a creationist nor an evangelical Christian, and his book is one of several to challenge evolution in scientific terms. Moreover, having religious beliefs does not preclude the ability to reason scientifically. Many great scientists Isaac Newton, Carolus Linnaeus, Georges Cuvier and Louis Pasteur, to name a few -were devoutly religious. <\/p>\n
Even in Darwins day, scientists who opposed evolution were charged with irrationality and religiosity. But they did not attack evolution on religious grounds; rather, they protested its lack of scientific proof and pointed to the evidence that supported a typological nature. The creationists were attacked as scientific heretics, while supporters of evolution refusing to admit the lack of evidence became the true heretics, replacing scientific foundations with metaphysics. See More <\/p>\n
What William describes is that those who propagated evolution were in fact scientists fascinated with metaphysics rather than actual science. Interestingly enough, after one glance at who propagated evolution, it is no wonder it is so popular today. The infamous Huxley bloodline is in large part responsible for the distribution of evolution. The Huxley family was a large part of creating the league of nations, and who happened to also be eugenicists. Thomas Henry Huxley was the grandfather to Aldous Huxley, author of The Brave New World, Julian Huxley, evolutionist and first director of UNESCO, and Nobel laureate physiologist, Andrew Huxley. <\/p>\n
Thomas Huxley was the first to apply the theory of natural selection to humanity to explain the course of human evolution. Before Darwin, even he was opposed to the earlier ideologies of evolution put forth by Lamarck and Robert Chambers, Huxley claimed that progressionist evolution was based in metaphysics rather than actual science. Although, Darwins bulldog, Huxley, altered his beliefs based on the book written by Darwin and Wallace, which is evident in the letter below; <\/p>\n
I finished your book yesterday. . . Since I read Von Baers Essays nine years ago no work on Natural History Science I have met with has made so great an impression on me & I do most heartily thank you for the great store of new views you have given me. . . As for your doctrines, I am prepared to go to the Stake if requisite. . . I trust you will not allow yourself to be in any way disgusted or annoyed by the considerable abuse & misrepresentation which unless I greatly mistake is in store for you. . . And as to the curs which will bark and yelp you must recollect that some of your friends at any rate are endowed with an amount of combativeness which (though you have often & justly rebuked it) may stand you in good stead I am sharpening up my claws and beak in readiness Letter of T. H. Huxley to Charles Darwin, November 23, 1859, regarding the Origin of Species See More <\/p>\n
Huxley again was one of the first adherents to Darwins theory of evolution by natural selection and did more than anyone else to advance its acceptance among scientists and the public alike. Thomass grandsons, Aldous and Julius, both saturated with the ideology of their grandfather on evolution, began their own studies which lead them to become proponent eugenists. Julius Huxley, however, was by far more influential than Aldous, being that he was the first director of UNESCO. <\/p>\n
UNESCO, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, is one of the largest organizations for education in the world, most of which was founded and directed by Eugenicists and Evolutionists. It is no wonder, that evolution is such a prominent theory today. <\/p>\n
Darwins origin of species book also granted Karl Marx the enthusiasm he needed to create the Communist Manifesto. Karl Marx called the book; the book which contains the basis in natural history for our view. Meaning that Darwins ideology of evolution is the basis of Marxism and Communism. However, Karl Marx did not generate his ideology alone, in fact, Thomas Huxley greatly helped; <\/p>\n
In 1862 Marx made a point of attending the public lectures on evolution given by Darwins supporter Thomas Huxley, and encouraged his political associates to join him. Wilhelm Liebknecht, a friend and comrade who often visited the Marx family in London, later recalled, when Darwin drew the conclusions from his research work and brought them to the knowledge of the public, we spoke of nothing else for months but Darwin and the enormous significance of his scientific discoveries. See More <\/p>\n
It is incredibly evident that the theory of evolution was the basis for Marxism. In other words, Darwins theories have created the belief that humans are not a special species. Instead, it has created the belief that humans are merely animals, which gives rise to the idea that life is not sacred at all, but rather it is disposable. Below is video evidence of that narrative, and is a clip from the documentary film; Evolution vs. God. <\/p>\n
Darwins theories on evolution and the origin of life, are mainly based on single cell ideology. According to the single cell theory, everything on earth, and,earth formed from a single cell some 3.5 to 4.1 Billion years ago. Interestingly enough the single cell ideology can also be traced to spiritualism and mystical occult teachings. In Hinduism, the second oldest religion, it is widely supported that everything formed from a golden womb or golden egg. Which has been poetically translated into the universal germ. <\/p>\n
Hindu belief: literally the golden womb or golden egg, poetically translated as universal germ) is the source of the creation of universe or the manifested cosmos in Vedic philosophy, as well as an avatar of Vishnu in the Bhagavata Purana. [1] It finds mention in one hymn of the Rigveda (RV 10.121), known as the Hirayagarbha Skta, suggesting a single creator deity (verse 8: yo devev dhi dev eka st, Griffith: He is the God of gods, and none beside him.), identified in the hymn as Prajpati. The concept of the golden womb is again mentioned in the Vishvakarman Skta (RV 10.82). Wiki <\/p>\n
The striking similarities between evolution and spiritualist ideologies, should raise stark questions about just why evolution came about, and who is exactly behind the push to prove evolution over creation from the Biblical narrative. <\/p>\n
It can be easily summed up that proponents of the elitist occult societies of the world have pushed Darwins theories to the limelight and further fomented the ideology of evolution for one simple reason, control. <\/p>\n
When humanity is not viewed in a sacred light, it becomes easier to mass murder individuals, Karl Marx proved that. When humanity is not viewed in a sacred light, humans become no more than animals, and it could easily be justified to enslave humanity. Understanding the motives behind evolution, and the modern metaphysical science, again brings into question the reality that yet again, the Bible spoke of these times, and they are called the End Times. In these days, according to scripture, science will increase. But wait, doesnt the Bible say knowledge, not science? <\/p>\n
Science is derived from the word scientia, in Latin meaning knowledge; the Bible again describes that knowledge will increase in those days according to Daniel 12:4. Mans desire for knowledge is what began all of this, in the garden of Eden, according to Genesis 2:16-17 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Thou shalt eat freely of every tree of the garden, 17 But of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof, thou shalt die the death. <\/p>\n
According to the Bible, deception comes from the serpent. According to Hinduism and the New Age Movement, knowledge is imparted to an individual after the awakening of the kundalini serpent spirit that lives at the base of the spine and expands to the top of the head. To learn more about the deception of Hinduism, how its woven into the New Age Movement, and how it is subverting the Church; see more here. <\/p>\n
Works Cited <\/p>\n
Peking University . Evolutionism Combined with Spiritualism: A. R. Wallaces Approach . Peking University . . (NA): . . <\/p>\n
Dr. Jerry Bergman. The Darwinian Foundation of Communism. Answers in Genesis. . (2001): . . <\/p>\n
WILLIAM W. WASSYNGER. Theory of Evolution Has Never Been Proved. NY Times. . (1989): . . <\/p>\n
ISR. Marx and Engels...and Darwin? ISR. . (NA): . . <\/p>\n
Berkely. Thomas Henry Huxley (1825-1895). Berkeley. . (NA): . . <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read more here: Science and evolution, evilution, are continually carried as fact and theory in regards to how things got started around here. But in reality, its where those facts and theories got started that explains why Christian creationism should be the dominant teaching. Since the beginning of time, a war has raged, and while the details have remained similar, the methodology has changed Continue reading
\n'Evilution:' The Secret Luciferian, Spiritual Origin To One of The Biggest Hoaxes in History Evolution - The Christian Truther<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"