The rights of Milo Yiannopoulos were violated. Angry about his politics and uncomfortable with his trolling, violent protestors kept him from delivering scheduled remarks in a public venue. His right to free speech was categorically infringed. <\/p>\n
But that was more than three weeks ago at UC Berkley and it bears zero resemblance to the current controversy surrounding Milo's CPAC speech. In reality, there's little threat to his First Amendment rights. <\/p>\n
For those unfamiliar with the obnoxious populist provocateur, Milo has made a career of exposing liberal double standards. The operating procedure of the Breitbart writer is pretty simple. He mocks the pieties held by many on the Left, trashing in particular the special treatment afforded to individual groups. <\/p>\n
And Milo puts on a good show. Normally his antics are more entertaining than his arguments are incisive. But he's always aggravating on purpose. That's gotten him kicked off of Twitter and college campuses, all the while catapulting his career. <\/p>\n
But his comments about pedophilia are beyond reprehensible. In a recently surfaced January 2016 video, Milo speaks fondly and even defends \"relationships between younger boys and older men.\" Later he makes light of the sexual abuse that rocked the Catholic Church, quipping that he's \"grateful for Father Michael\" and adds that he \"wouldn't give nearly such good head if it wasn't for him.\" <\/p>\n
Is all of this terribly offensive? Absolutely. Is it protected speech under the First Amendment? Yes. Does that mean that CPAC will violate Milo's rights if they cancel his speech? Not at all. <\/p>\n
As a private organization, CPAC can give a venue to whomever they please. Whether they cut or keep Milo in the speaking line-up for this week's conference in Washington, D.C., is completely up to them. Whether he speaks or is silenced, his rights won't be violated. <\/p>\n
There's only one way the Berkley episode can be replayed this Friday. If a violent mob rips him from the stage or the government bars him from speaking. Clearly, there's little chance of that happening. <\/p>\n
Philip Wegmann is a commentary writer for the Washington Examiner. <\/p>\n
Also from the Washington Examiner <\/p>\n
Yiannopoulos' book deal was worth a reported $250,000 and was expected to be released in June. <\/p>\n
02\/20\/17 5:45 PM <\/p>\n
Top Story <\/p>\n
H.R. McMaster replaces Mike Flynn as Trump's national security adviser. <\/p>\n
By Caitlin Yilek, Kelly Cohen <\/p>\n
02\/20\/17 3:03 PM <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
See the rest here: The rights of Milo Yiannopoulos were violated. Continue reading
\nNo, Milo Yiannopoulos' 1st Amendment rights aren't at risk - Washington Examiner<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"