Photo illustration by Jeff Boyer \/ Times Union <\/p>\n
Photo illustration by Jeff Boyer \/ Times Union <\/p>\n
Editorial: Censorship in the Senate <\/p>\n
THE ISSUE: <\/p>\n
The Senate majority leader shuts down criticism of a Cabinet nominee. <\/p>\n
THE STAKES: <\/p>\n
Where do such heavy-handed tactics end at a time of one-party rule? <\/p>\n
--- <\/p>\n
An extraordinary moment came Tuesday in the U.S. Senate when Sen. Elizabeth Warren was told to sit down. She'd gone too far, it seems, in criticizing a Cabinet nominee. <\/p>\n
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell shut down Ms. Warren on the grounds that Jeff Sessions of Alabama, President Donald Trump's pick for attorney general, is a senator himself, and as such should not be \"impugned.\" <\/p>\n
Whatever your political loyalty, this censoring of an elected representative marks a dangerous development for our democracy. <\/p>\n
Ms. Warren, D-Mass., was speaking against Mr. Sessions' nomination Tuesday when the chair interrupted to remind her of Senate Rule 19, which states \"no Senator in debate shall, directly or indirectly, by any form of words impute to another Senator or to other Senators any conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a Senator.\" Ms. Warren had been voicing a host of concerns about Mr. Sessions' record on civil rights, abortion, women and immigration. She quoted harsh criticism he had drawn in 1986, when Mr. Sessions was being considered for a federal judgeship, from then-Sen. Edward Kennedy and civil rights icon Coretta Scott King. She continued until Mr. McConnell and his GOP colleagues cut her off, a ruling sustained by a party-line vote. <\/p>\n
Put aside that it's absurd to argue Mr. Sessions merits more tender treatment than any other nominee. Let's call this for what it is: The majority leader of what's called the world's most deliberative body stifling deliberation he disagrees with. <\/p>\n
Mr. McConnell has employed this sort of partisan heavy-handedness in various ways before, notably in snubbing the Constitution by refusing to even consider former President Barack Obama's nominee for Supreme Court last year. That capped a long campaign of partisan obstructionism. <\/p>\n
What we are witnessing what should matter to all Americans is nothing less than a breakdown of the norms of democratic government. Republican stonewalling of Mr. Obama's lower-level judicial appointments led Democrats to eliminate filibusters for those posts when they ran the Senate. Now Republicans may do the same on Supreme Court nominations. So much for a long-standing check on unbridled majority rule. <\/p>\n
And now Mr. McConnell has introduced a new prospect: shut down whatever speech the majority doesn't like. What's next? <\/p>\n
It's all the more alarming at a time of one-party rule in Congress and the presidency, and with Mr. Trump promising to pack the Supreme Court with ideologues. A top adviser to the president tells the free press to \"keep its mouth shut\" even as the Senate's leader says as much to one of the foremost women in the opposition party. <\/p>\n
If they care nothing for the legacy this behavior is leaving our republic, Mr. McConnell and Republicans should at least weigh their own self-interest. Every bad precedent they enjoy setting today they will surely regret tomorrow. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Visit link: Photo illustration by Jeff Boyer \/ Times Union Photo illustration by Jeff Boyer \/ Times Union Editorial: Censorship in the Senate THE ISSUE: The Senate majority leader shuts down criticism of a Cabinet nominee. THE STAKES: Where do such heavy-handed tactics end at a time of one-party rule? Continue reading
\nEditorial: Censorship in the Senate - Albany Times Union<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"