{"id":174509,"date":"2016-11-29T01:25:31","date_gmt":"2016-11-29T06:25:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/the-abolition-of-man-wikipedia\/"},"modified":"2016-11-29T01:25:31","modified_gmt":"2016-11-29T06:25:31","slug":"the-abolition-of-man-wikipedia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/abolition-of-work\/the-abolition-of-man-wikipedia\/","title":{"rendered":"The Abolition of Man &#8211; Wikipedia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The Abolition of Man is a 1943 book by C. S. Lewis. It is    subtitled \"Reflections on education with special reference to    the teaching of English in the upper forms of    schools,\" and uses that as a starting point for a defense of    objective value and natural law, and a warning of the    consequences of doing away with or \"debunking\" those things. It    defends science as something worth pursuing but criticizes    using it to debunk valuesthe value of science itself being    among themor defining it to exclude such values. The book was    first delivered as a series of three evening lectures at    King's College,    Newcastle, part of the University of    Durham, as the Riddell Memorial Lectures on February 2426,    1943.  <\/p>\n<p>    Lewis begins with a critical response to The Green Book, by    Gaius and Titius, i.e. The Control of Language: A Critical    Approach to Reading and Writing, published in 1939 by Alex    King and Martin Ketley.[1] The Green book    was used as a text for upper form students in British    schools.[2]  <\/p>\n<p>    Lewis criticises the authors for subverting student values. He    claims that they teach that all statements of value (such as    \"this waterfall is sublime\") are merely statements about the    speaker's feelings and say nothing about the object. Lewis says    that such a subjective view of values is faulty, and, on the    contrary, certain objects and actions merit positive or    negative reactions: that a waterfall can actually be    objectively praiseworthy, and that one's actions can be    objectively good or evil. In any case, Lewis notes, this    is a philosophical position rather than a grammatical one, and    so parents and teachers who give such books to their children    and students are having them read the \"work of amateur    philosophers where they expected the work of professional    grammarians.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Lewis cites ancient thinkers such as Plato, Aristotle and Augustine, who believed that the    purpose of education was to train children in \"ordinate    affections,\" that is, to train them to like and dislike what    they ought; to love the good and hate the bad. He says that    although these values are universal, they do not develop    automatically or inevitably in children (and so are not    \"natural\" in that sense of the word), but must be taught    through education. Those who lack them lack the specifically    human element, the trunk that unites intellectual man with    visceral (animal) man, and may be called \"men without chests\".  <\/p>\n<p>    Lewis criticizes modern attempts to debunk \"natural\" values    (such as those that would deny objective value to the    waterfall) on rational grounds. He says that there is a set of    objective values that have been shared, with minor differences,    by every culture \"...the traditional moralities of East and    West, the Christian, the Pagan, and the Jew...\". Lewis calls    this the Tao (which    closely resembles Taoist usage).[a] Without the    Tao, no value judgments can be made at all, and modern    attempts to do away with some parts of traditional morality for    some \"rational\" reason always proceed by arbitrarily selecting    one part of the Tao and using it as grounds to debunk    the others.  <\/p>\n<p>    The final chapter describes the ultimate consequences of this    debunking: a distant future in which the values and morals of    the majority are controlled by a small group who rule by a    \"perfect\" understanding of psychology, and who in turn, being    able to \"see through\" any system of morality that might induce    them to act in a certain way, are ruled only by their own    unreflected whims. In surrendering rational reflection on their    own motivations, the controllers will no longer be recognizably    human, the controlled will be robot-like, and the Abolition    of Man will have been completed.  <\/p>\n<p>    An appendix to The Abolition of Man lists a number of    basic values seen by Lewis as parts of the Tao,    supported by quotations from different cultures.  <\/p>\n<p>    A fictional treatment of the dystopian project to carry out the Abolition    of Man is a theme of Lewis's novel That Hideous Strength.  <\/p>\n<p>    Passages from The Abolition of Man are included in    William    Bennett's 1993 book The Book of    Virtues.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Link:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Abolition_of_Man\" title=\"The Abolition of Man - Wikipedia\">The Abolition of Man - Wikipedia<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The Abolition of Man is a 1943 book by C. S. Lewis.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/abolition-of-work\/the-abolition-of-man-wikipedia\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187730],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-174509","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-abolition-of-work"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174509"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=174509"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174509\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=174509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=174509"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=174509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}