{"id":174115,"date":"2016-10-25T07:35:27","date_gmt":"2016-10-25T11:35:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/nsa-can-access-more-phone-data-than-ever-abc-news\/"},"modified":"2016-10-25T07:35:27","modified_gmt":"2016-10-25T11:35:27","slug":"nsa-can-access-more-phone-data-than-ever-abc-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/nsa-2\/nsa-can-access-more-phone-data-than-ever-abc-news\/","title":{"rendered":"NSA Can Access More Phone Data Than Ever &#8211; ABC News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    One of the reforms designed to rein in the surveillance    authorities of the National Security Agency has perhaps    inadvertently solved a technical problem for the spy outfit and    granted it potential access to much more data than before, a    former top official told ABC News.  <\/p>\n<p>    Before the signing of the USA Freedom Act in June 2015, one of    the NSA's most controversial programs was the    mass collection of telephonic metadata from millions of    Americans  the information about calls, including the    telephone numbers involved, the time and the duration but not    the calls' content  under a broad interpretation of the Patriot Act's Section 215.    From this large \"haystack,\" as officials have called it, NSA    analysts could get approval to run queries on specific numbers    purportedly linked to international terrorism investigations.  <\/p>\n<p>    The problem for the NSA was that the haystack was only about 30    percent as big as it should've been; the NSA database was    missing a lot of data. As The Washington Post reported in 2014, the    agency was not getting information from all wireless carriers    and it also couldn't handle the deluge of data that was coming    in.  <\/p>\n<p>    On the technical side, Chris Inglis, who served as the NSA's    deputy director until January 2014, recently told ABC News that    when major telecommunications companies previously handed over    customer records, the NSA \"just didn't ingest all of it.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    \"[NSA officials] were trying to make sure they were doing it    exactly right,\" he said, meaning making sure that the data was    being pulled in according to existing privacy policies. The    metadata also came in various forms from the different    companies, so the NSA had to reformat much of it before loading    it into a searchable database.  <\/p>\n<p>    Both hurdles meant that the NSA couldn't keep up, and of all    the metadata the agency wanted to be available for specific    searches internally, only about a third of it actually was.  <\/p>\n<p>    But then the USA Freedom Act was signed into law, and now    Inglis said, all that is \"somebody else's problem.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    The USA Freedom Act ended the NSA's bulk collection of metadata    but charged the telecommunications companies with keeping the    data on hand. The NSA and other U.S. government agencies now    must request information about specific phone numbers or other    identifying elements from the telecommunications companies    after going through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act    (FISA) court and arguing that there is a \"reasonable, articulable suspicion\" that the    number is associated with international terrorism.  <\/p>\n<p>    As a result, the NSA no longer has to worry about keeping up    its own database and, according to Inglis, the percentage of    available records has shot up from 30 percent to virtually 100.    Rather than one internal, incomplete database, the NSA can now    query any of several complete ones.  <\/p>\n<p>    The new system \"guarantees that the NSA can have access to all    of it,\" Inglis said.  <\/p>\n<p>    NSA general counsel Glenn Gerstell made a brief reference to    the increased capacity in a post for the Lawfare blog in January after    terrorist attacks at home and abroad.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Largely overlooked in the debate that has ensued in the wake    of recent attacks is the fact that under the new arrangement,    our national security professionals will have access to a    greater volume of call records subject to query in a way that    is consistent with our regard for civil liberties,\" he wrote.  <\/p>\n<p>    Mark Rumold, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier    Foundation, told ABC News he doesn't have much of a problem    with the NSA's wider access to telephone data, since now the    agency has to go through a \"legitimate\" system with \"procedural    protections\" before jumping into the databases.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Their ability to obtain records has broadened, but by all    accounts, they're collecting a far narrower pool of data than    they were initially,\" he said, referring to returns on specific    searches. \"They can use a type of legal process with a broader    spectrum of providers than earlier. To me, that isn't like a    strike against it. That's almost something in favor of it,    because we've gone through this public process, we've had this    debate, and this is where we settled on the scope of the    authority we were going to give them.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Rumold said he's still concerned about the NSA's ability to get    information on phone numbers linked to a number in question     up to two \"hops\" away  but he said the USA Freedom Act    \"remains a step in the right direction.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    The trade-off of the new system, according to Inglis, is in the    efficiency of the searches. Whereas in the past the NSA could    instantaneously run approved searches of its database, now the    agency must approach each telecommunications company to ask    about a number and then wait for a response.  <\/p>\n<p>    In his January post Gerstell acknowledged concerns that the new    approach could be \"too cumbersome to be effective\" and said the    NSA will report to Congress on how the arrangement is working.    A representative for the NSA declined to tell ABC News if any    problems have been encountered so far, and Rumold noted there    has been no public evidence of any issues.  <\/p>\n<p>    Inglis said he isn't terribly concerned if the searches are a    little slower. It's a small price to pay, he said, for what he    called an \"additional safeguard\" that could increase the    public's confidence in what the NSA is and how it operates.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>More here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/US\/nsa-potentially-access-phone-data\/story?id=42892417\" title=\"NSA Can Access More Phone Data Than Ever - ABC News\">NSA Can Access More Phone Data Than Ever - ABC News<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> One of the reforms designed to rein in the surveillance authorities of the National Security Agency has perhaps inadvertently solved a technical problem for the spy outfit and granted it potential access to much more data than before, a former top official told ABC News. Before the signing of the USA Freedom Act in June 2015, one of the NSA's most controversial programs was the mass collection of telephonic metadata from millions of Americans the information about calls, including the telephone numbers involved, the time and the duration but not the calls' content under a broad interpretation of the Patriot Act's Section 215.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/nsa-2\/nsa-can-access-more-phone-data-than-ever-abc-news\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94881],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-174115","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nsa-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174115"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=174115"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174115\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=174115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=174115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=174115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}