{"id":172922,"date":"2016-07-12T05:31:36","date_gmt":"2016-07-12T09:31:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.designerchildren.com\/political-correctness-language-and-thought-control-the\/"},"modified":"2016-07-12T05:31:36","modified_gmt":"2016-07-12T09:31:36","slug":"political-correctness-language-and-thought-control-the-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/political-correctness\/political-correctness-language-and-thought-control-the-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Political Correctness = Language and Thought Control &#8211; The &#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      Political correctness is a Rothschild invention of language      control. Like Orwellian Newspeak in 1984, its      ultimateaim is to reduce the scope of free thought.    <\/p>\n<p>    And language control is thought control. Period. The rise of    modern political correctness (PC) is a great example of the    cunning way in which social engineers such as the New World    Order manipulators operate.Political correctness is    soft censorship.It is intolerance    disguised as tolerance. As George Carlin said, it is    fascism pretending to be manners. It is running amok    not just in Universities but now almost everywhere in society.    Just as Orwell laid out so precisely in 1984,    political correctness is the Newspeak which is    threatening tolimit our ability to freely speak and    think, by reducing the number of available words in our    vocabulary.  <\/p>\n<p>    Truth is stranger than fiction. When you look at the twisted    contortions the PC crowd is insisting people go through to rid    their language of anything offensive, it has entered the    theater of the absurd. Political correctnessdictates what    you can and cant say, based on how offensive aword is.    Right off the bat there are severalproblems with this.    Firstly, who are the commissars,officials or authorities    who are granting themselves massive power by getting to decide    what ranks as offensive? Secondly, since when did feeling    offended or having your feelings hurt become such an    important issue that it legally justifies restricting    everyones freedom? Last time I checked, freedom of speech was    a genuine and legitimate human right (enshrined in the legal    documents of many countries), whereas the right to not feel    offended is imaginary and non-existent.  <\/p>\n<p>      The illusory right to feel offended  a great way to shame      people into feeling guilty for no good reason.    <\/p>\n<p>    Thirdly  and most importantly  just as beauty is in the eye    of the beholder, so too is feeling offended in the realm of    thebeholder. Words are words; each person is in charge of    their own emotions; choose to ignore, respond or react to words    how you want, but dont blame someone else for your emotional    state. You are in control of your own state of consciousness.    To blame someone else because you feel angry, offended or    upsetshows an abandonment of responsibility and an utter    lack of emotional and spiritual maturity.Since when did    we humans become such crybabies that wecouldnt stand    hearing or being called a word, a name, a label or a phrase?    Grow up, please!  <\/p>\n<p>    As always, theres more to the story here.Political    correctness has roots in marxism and communism. Wikipedia notes that In the early-to-mid 20th    century, the phrase politically correct was associated with    thedogmaticapplication    ofStalinistdoctrine, debated    betweenCommunistParty members    andSocialists. However, it goes back further to    theFrankfurt School (Institute for Social    Research) in Germany, which was set up in 1923.    TheFrankfurt school was a think tank for social    engineering, aiming tospread collectivism (or its    offshoots of socialism, marxism and communism) around the    world. Asthis article from the Schiller Institute states:  <\/p>\n<p>      The task of the Frankfurt School, then, was first, to      undermine the Judeo-Christian legacy through an abolition of      culture (Aufhebung der Kulturin Lukacs German); and,      second, to determine new cultural forms which      wouldincrease the alienation of the      population,thus creating a new barbarism.    <\/p>\n<p>    It goes on to point out those funding the Frankfurt School:  <\/p>\n<p>      although the Institute for Social Research started with      Comintern [CommunismInternational] support, over the      next three decades its sources of funds included various      German and American universities, the Rockefeller Foundation,      Columbia Broadcasting System, the American Jewish Committee,      several American intelligence services, the Office of the      U.S. High Commissioner for Germany, the International Labour      Organization, and the Hacker Institute, a posh psychiatric      clinic in Beverly Hills.    <\/p>\n<p>    Sowe have reference to the Rockefellers funding the    Frankfurt School, and it is well known that the Rothschilds funded the rise of marxism:  <\/p>\n<p>      Nathan Rothschild had given Marx two checks for several      thousand pounds to finance the cause of Socialism. The checks      were put on display in the British Museum, after Lord Lionel      Walter Rothschild, a trustee, had willed his museum and      library to them.    <\/p>\n<p>    Both of these key New World Order families are thus implicated    in marxism, the Frankfurt School and political correctness.    Interestingly, many researches have pointed out that political    correctness is part of a broader movement of cultural    marxism,which is the subversion of a countrys    culture with collectivist ideology, as opposed to the more    direct political version.  <\/p>\n<p>    Yuri Bezmenov, a former SovietKGB agent,    said that ideological subversion would change the perception    of reality of every American. He outlined how there was a slow    brainwashing process taking place to change the individualistic    culture of the West, consisting of:  <\/p>\n<p>    1. Demoralization (covert, 15-50 years)    (basically completed);  <\/p>\n<p>    2. Destabilization (overt, 2-5 years);  <\/p>\n<p>    3. Crisis (6 weeks);  <\/p>\n<p>    4. Violent Change and Normalization (can take    years, goes on forever).  <\/p>\n<p>    All this was with the aim of making the West collectivist. The    question is: how much has it worked?  <\/p>\n<p>      Political correctness vs free speech (1st amendment): who      will win?    <\/p>\n<p>    Whatever good intentions political correctness may have had in    trying to stop homophobia, racism, sexism and discrimination of    any kind, it has long passed the threshold of absurdity.    Consider the following examples of what the PC crowd is trying    to make people say with their bias-free    language:  <\/p>\n<p>    seniors, elders, elderly => people of advanced age  <\/p>\n<p>    overweight, obese => people of size  <\/p>\n<p>    rich => people of material wealth  <\/p>\n<p>    American => US citizen  <\/p>\n<p>    This last one is especially interesting, given that the US    Government is a corporation which lays claim to the entire    United States of America, whereas American denotes a    natural-born individual of the Republic. The PC police also    want to eliminate the following words:  <\/p>\n<p>      male, female, father, mother, too, hard worker, third      world,crazy, insane, retarded, gay, tyranny, gypped,      illegal alien, fag, ghetto, raghead    <\/p>\n<p>    and phrases such as I want to die and that test raped me.  <\/p>\n<p>    Donald Trump recently got heckled for using    the termanchor baby by a PC journalist, who wanted him    to say the American born child of an undocumented immigrant.    What a mouthful. Funnily, enough that PC journalist was    breaking his own inane rules, since now were been told that    American is disallowed.Remember theban bossy campaign? Grown adults indulging in    utter stupidity. More political correctness and    languagecontrol. How can you ban a word anyway?  <\/p>\n<p>      Even Mr. Nonsense makes far more sense than political      correctness.    <\/p>\n<p>    Its not just specific words or phrases that the PC crowd want    to obliterate. At some universities, they are banning entire    ways of behaving. Check out these ridiculous    university rules (taken from the book Choosing the Right College2012-2013),    which have moved beyond speech control into total behavior    control:  <\/p>\n<p>     Brown University: banned any speech making people feel    angry, impotent and disenfranchised  <\/p>\n<p>     Colby College: banned any speech leading to loss of self    esteem  <\/p>\n<p>     Bryn Mawr College: banned suggestive looks  <\/p>\n<p>     Haverford College: banned unwelcome flirtation  <\/p>\n<p>     University of Connecticut: banne<br \/>\nd inappropriate laughter  <\/p>\n<p>     West Virginia University: banned theuse of words    boyfriend or girlfriend but instead told students they    haveto use the words lover or partner.  <\/p>\n<p>          Look what the Grand Valley State University          recommends we do to allegedly remove bias from our          language:        <\/p>\n<p>            Avoiding Racism and Ageism          <\/p>\n<p>            Mention a persons race or age only if it is relevant            to the story.            Biased: A strange Black man spoke to me at the grocery            store.            Better: A strange man spoke to me at the grocery store.          <\/p>\n<p>            Disability and Disease          <\/p>\n<p>            Focus on people rather than conditions.            Biased: I met an epileptic on the bus today.            Better: I met a person with epilepsy on the bus today.          <\/p>\n<p>          Since when is becoming less descriptive equivalent to          less discriminatory?Talk about a perversion of          straight and ordinary speech! Political correctness is          standing reality on its head. Here is a chilling quote          from 1984:        <\/p>\n<p>            You havent a real appreciation of Newspeak,            Winston, he said almost sadlyIn your            heart youd prefer to stick to Oldspeak, with all its            vagueness and its useless shades of meaning. You dont            grasp the beauty of the destruction of words. Do you            know that Newspeak is the only language in the world            whose vocabulary gets smaller every year?          <\/p>\n<p>            Dont you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to            narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make            thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will            be no words in which to express it           <\/p>\n<p>          All words are potentially offensive.          Everywordcould potentially be associated with          something bad, so every wordcould come under the          scrutiny of the PCpolice.Slurs, insults and          derogatory language have always existed ever since humans          could speak. You cant just annihilate them. Even the          concepts ofmicroaggression andhate speech          are failed notions, trying to make havingyour          feelings hurt or getting offended morally          orlegally equivalentwith harassment. There is          no equivalence! Stick and stones may break my bones, but          names will never hurt me         <\/p>\n<p>            A message just in for those pushing political            correctness and thought control. Please fuck off  and            I mean that in the most respectful of ways, because I            certainly wouldnt want to offend anyone           <\/p>\n<p>          I encourage anyone whohas even a mild interest in a          free humanity with complete freedom of speech, and total          freedom of thought, to resist political correctness with          every fiber of your being.If you are concerned          about hurting peoples feelings unnecessarily, you can          always find ways to express something in the right way.          In those kind of situations, what really matters is the          way you say words, not what you say.        <\/p>\n<p>          We dont need speech police to tell us          what we can and cant say  or can and cant think. We          dont need to go through convoluted verbal gymnastics and          masturbation just to say what we think or express          ourselves.        <\/p>\n<p>          Its time for those hiding behind feeling offended to          grow up. Stop demanding those around you change because          of your lack of maturity. Stop trying to hijack          everyones else freedom because of your timidity. Just as          beauty is in the eye of the beholder, offense in the          mind, attitude and reaction of the beholder.        <\/p>\n<p>          Itstime to call a spade a spade. We need the          spirit of straight talking. Weneed the courage to          speak truth to power, not to go in the opposite direction          and become afraid of saying anything.The real          agenda of political correctness is to stifle objective          investigation and free speech. Ultimately, it is to          eliminate criticism of the NWO manipulatorsunder          the guise of stopping hate speech and making everything          fair and equal.        <\/p>\n<p>          *****        <\/p>\n<p>          Want the latest commentaryand analysis on          Conspiracy, Natural Health, Sovereignty, Consciousness          and more? Sign up forfree blog updates!        <\/p>\n<p>          Makia Freeman is the editor ofThe Freedom Articlesand senior          researcher atToolsForFreedom.com(FaceBookhere), writing on many aspects          of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the          worldwideconspiracy to suggesting solutions for how          humanity can create a new system of peace and          abundance.        <\/p>\n<p>          Sources:        <\/p>\n<p>          <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Political_correctness\" rel=\"nofollow\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Political_correctness<\/a>        <\/p>\n<p>          <a href=\"http:\/\/www.schillerinstitute.org\/fid_91-96\/921_frankfurt.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.schillerinstitute.org\/fid_91-96\/921_frankfurt.html<\/a>        <\/p>\n<p>          <a href=\"http:\/\/antinewworldorder.blogspot.com\/2007\/10\/who-was-karl-marx.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/antinewworldorder.blogspot.com\/2007\/10\/who-was-karl-marx.html<\/a>        <\/p>\n<p>          *https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=lMl4kIxw-jo        <\/p>\n<p>          *https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=AAYQ-rfj1CI        <\/p>\n<p>          *https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=xyOxQJNC2Us        <\/p>\n<p>          *https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=6dynbzMlCcw        <\/p>\n<p>          <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gvsu.edu\/cms3\/assets\/C7078FCF-E2C3-F3DD-7F8E1630561E3F3E\/bias-free_language.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">https:\/\/www.gvsu.edu\/cms3\/assets\/C7078FCF-E2C3-F3DD-7F8E1630561E3F3E\/bias-free_language.pdf<\/a>        <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to read the rest:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com\/political-correctness-language-thought-control\/\" title=\"Political Correctness = Language and Thought Control - The ...\">Political Correctness = Language and Thought Control - The ...<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Political correctness is a Rothschild invention of language control. Like Orwellian Newspeak in 1984, its ultimateaim is to reduce the scope of free thought <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/political-correctness\/political-correctness-language-and-thought-control-the-2\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187751],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-172922","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-political-correctness"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172922"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=172922"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172922\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=172922"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=172922"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=172922"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}